• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持加拿大护理学生参加 NCLEX-RN 考试:三阶段混合方法描述性设计。

Supporting Canadian Nursing Students to Write the NCLEX-RN Exam: A Three-Phased Mixed Methods Descriptive Design.

机构信息

Sally Horsfall Eaton School of Nursing, 7949George Brown College, Toronto, Canada.

Trent/Fleming School of Nursing, 104270Trent University, Peterborough, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2022 Sep;54(3):331-344. doi: 10.1177/08445621221103933. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1177/08445621221103933
PMID:35658610
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2015, the College of Nurses of Ontario, replaced the Canadian Registered Nurse Examination with the NCLEX-RN exam as entry-to-practice. Faculty in a college-university partnership searched for products to provide nursing students with focused practice in writing exams modelled on the Canadian NCLEX-RN test plan.

PURPOSE

The aim of this three-phased evaluation study was to test and validate NCLEX-RN exam preparation materials newly developed for the Canadian context.

METHODS

A mixed methods descriptive design was used to capture subjective perspectives and objective measures. After ethical approval was obtained, 13 students assessed the e-learning platform's usability. Eight faculty/clinical experts assessed the content validity of materials using a content validity index (CVI) at both item (I-CVI), and scale (S-CVI) levels. Lastly, 72 completed tests served as the basis for assessing psychometric properties of selected test items.

RESULTS

Materials were assessed as useful and easy to use and navigate. I-CVIs ranged between 0.5 to 1.0 with none falling below 0.5 while S-CVIs were above the standard for acceptability of greater than 0.8 with none falling below 0.9. Overall test reliability measured by the Kuder-Richardson formula was 0.73. Many items assessed for difficulty (64%) showed a proportion of correct responses within desired ranges, and most point-biserial indices ranged from fair to very good.

CONCLUSION

Strong evidence supported the usability and content validity of the materials assessed. Item difficulty and discrimination analyses were within acceptable ranges. Suggestions for improvements were offered. Predictive analysis should form the basis of future research in this area.

摘要

背景

2015 年,安大略省护士学院(College of Nurses of Ontario)用美国注册护士执照考试(NCLEX-RN)取代了加拿大注册护士考试,作为执业的准入考试。在学院-大学合作关系中,教师们寻找产品,为护理学生提供基于加拿大 NCLEX-RN 考试计划的考试重点练习。

目的

本三阶段评价研究旨在测试和验证为加拿大环境新开发的 NCLEX-RN 考试准备材料。

方法

采用混合方法描述性设计,以捕捉主观观点和客观测量结果。在获得伦理批准后,13 名学生评估了电子学习平台的可用性。8 位教师/临床专家使用内容有效性指数(I-CVI 和 S-CVI)评估材料的内容有效性,在项目(I-CVI)和量表(S-CVI)水平上。最后,72 项完成的测试作为评估选定测试项目心理测量特性的基础。

结果

材料被评估为有用且易于使用和导航。I-CVI 范围在 0.5 到 1.0 之间,没有低于 0.5 的,而 S-CVI 均高于可接受性标准,大于 0.8,没有低于 0.9 的。通过 Kuder-Richardson 公式测量的整体测试可靠性为 0.73。许多评估难度的项目(64%)显示出正确答案比例在预期范围内,大多数点二项式指数范围从一般到非常好。

结论

强有力的证据支持了评估材料的可用性和内容有效性。项目难度和区分度分析在可接受范围内。提出了改进建议。预测分析应成为该领域未来研究的基础。

相似文献

1
Supporting Canadian Nursing Students to Write the NCLEX-RN Exam: A Three-Phased Mixed Methods Descriptive Design.支持加拿大护理学生参加 NCLEX-RN 考试:三阶段混合方法描述性设计。
Can J Nurs Res. 2022 Sep;54(3):331-344. doi: 10.1177/08445621221103933. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
2
NCLEX-RN preparation resources available online in French: An integrative review.在线提供的法语版 NCLEX-RN 备考资源:综合评价。
Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Jun;69(2):211-220. doi: 10.1111/inr.12705. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Supporting student success on the practical nurse (PN) licensure exam: The Health Education Systems Incorporated (HESI) PN Exit Exam Study.助力学生通过执业护士(PN)资格考试:健康教育系统公司(HESI)PN 结业考试研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105669. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105669. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
The Work of Preparing Canadian Nurses for A Licensure Exam Originating from the USA: A Nurse Educator's Journey into the Institutional Organization of the NCLEX-RN.为加拿大护士准备源自美国的执照考试的工作:一位护士教育工作者探索NCLEX-RN机构组织的历程
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2019 Mar 12;16(1):ijnes-2018-0052. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2018-0052.
5
The Forgotten: The Challenges Faced by Francophone Nursing Candidates following the Introduction of the NCLEX-RN in Canada.被遗忘的群体:加拿大引入NCLEX-RN后法语区护理考生面临的挑战
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2019 Dec;32(4):66-73. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2020.26100.
6
People are failing! Something needs to be done: Canadian students' experience with the NCLEX-RN.人们正在失败!必须采取措施:加拿大学生参加美国国家执业护士执照考试(注册护士)的经历。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Identifying Indicators of National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) Success in Nursing Graduates in Newfoundland & Labrador.确定纽芬兰与拉布拉多省护理专业毕业生通过美国国家执业护士执照考试(NCLEX-RN)的指标。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2019 Aug 6;16(1):ijnes-2018-0060. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2018-0060.
8
A Closer Look at the Introduction of the NCLEX-RN in Canada.深入了解加拿大的NCLEX-RN考试引入情况。
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2019 Dec;32(4):46-56. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2020.26102.
9
The Applicability of the NCLEX-RN to the Canadian Testing Population: A Review of Regulatory Body Evidence.NCLEX-RN 对加拿大考生群体的适用性:监管机构证据综述
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2017 Jan 31;14(1):/j/ijnes.2017.14.issue-1/ijnes-2016-0078/ijnes-2016-0078.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2016-0078.
10
Predictors of Success in the NCLEX-RN for Canadian Graduates.加拿大毕业生NCLEX-RN考试成功的预测因素。
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2019 Dec;32(4):30-45. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2020.26103.