• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术技术和内侧髁炎的临床结果:系统评价。

Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes for Medial Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2506-2515. doi: 10.1177/03635465221095565. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/03635465221095565
PMID:35658623
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medial epicondylitis (ME) is a pathological condition that arises in laborers and athletes secondary to repetitive wrist flexion and forearm pronation causing degeneration of the common flexor tendon. Although nonoperative management has demonstrated high rates of success, no standardized surgical technique has been established for situations when operative management is indicated.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the surgical treatment options for ME and evaluate the associated patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that surgical management of ME would vary across studies but no technique would prove to be superior.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Searches were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane databases between 1980 and April 2020. All level 1 to 4 studies were identified that focused on surgical management and PROs in the setting of ME. Description of surgical technique and PROs were required for inclusion. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed the studies for eligibility. Weighted means were calculated for demographic characteristics and available PROs.

RESULTS

Overall, 851 studies were identified according to the search criteria. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and therefore were evaluated. Three surgical techniques were found: open (13 studies), arthroscopic (2 studies), and percutaneous (1 study). Descriptions of the open technique were subdivided into those with (7 studies) and without (6 studies) common flexor tendon repair. Analysis included 479 elbows; patients were primarily male (58.3%) with a weighted mean age of 47.2 years. Weighted mean follow-up was 4.6 years. Tennis and manual laborer were the most common sport and occupation, respectively. Surgical success ranged from 63% to 100%, with a low complication rate of 4.3%. Success rates for return to sports and work were 81%-100% and 66.7%-100%, respectively, and only 1 study reported a return to work rate <90%.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that surgical intervention for refractory ME often has a high success rate. Regardless of surgical technique performed, patients generally demonstrated an improvement in PROs, and an encouraging number returned to work with limited complications. Further investigation is necessary to determine superiority among open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques.

摘要

背景

medial epicondylitis(ME)是一种病理状况,在劳动者和运动员中由于反复的手腕弯曲和前臂旋前导致常见屈肌腱退化而出现。尽管非手术治疗已显示出很高的成功率,但对于需要手术治疗的情况,尚未确立标准化的手术技术。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是对 ME 的手术治疗选择进行系统评价,并评估相关的患者报告结果(PROs)。我们假设 ME 的手术治疗会因研究而异,但没有一种技术会被证明更优越。

研究设计

系统评价;证据水平,4。

方法

1980 年至 2020 年 4 月期间,使用 PubMed、EMBASE、Cumulative Index of Nursing Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)、SPORTDiscus 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了检索。确定了所有重点关注 ME 手术治疗和 PROs 的 1 至 4 级研究。纳入标准为需要描述手术技术和 PROs。研究人员独立地对研究进行了双重摘要和审查,以确定其是否符合入选标准。计算了人口统计学特征和可用 PROs 的加权平均值。

结果

根据搜索标准,共确定了 851 项研究。共有 16 项研究符合纳入和排除标准,因此进行了评估。发现了三种手术技术:开放性(13 项研究)、关节镜(2 项研究)和经皮(1 项研究)。开放性技术的描述分为有(7 项研究)和无(6 项研究)常见屈肌腱修复。分析包括 479 个肘部;患者主要为男性(58.3%),加权平均年龄为 47.2 岁。加权平均随访时间为 4.6 年。网球和体力劳动者是最常见的运动和职业,分别为 63%和 100%。手术成功率为 63%至 100%,并发症发生率低至 4.3%。重返运动和工作的成功率分别为 81%至 100%和 66.7%至 100%,只有 1 项研究报告的重返工作率<90%。

结论

本系统评价表明,对于难治性 ME,手术干预通常具有很高的成功率。无论进行何种手术技术,患者的 PROs 通常都会得到改善,并且有相当数量的患者返回工作岗位,并发症有限。需要进一步的研究来确定开放性、关节镜和经皮技术之间的优势。

相似文献

1
Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes for Medial Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review.手术技术和内侧髁炎的临床结果:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2506-2515. doi: 10.1177/03635465221095565. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A Systematic Review of Tennis Elbow Surgery: Open Versus Arthroscopic Versus Percutaneous Release of the Common Extensor Origin.网球肘手术的系统评价:开放手术、关节镜手术与经皮伸肌总腱起点松解术的比较
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jun;33(6):1260-1268.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Ten- to 14-year follow-up of the Nirschl surgical technique for lateral epicondylitis.对Nirschl治疗外侧上髁炎手术技术的10至14年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):261-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308932. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
5
An effective approach to diagnosis and surgical repair of refractory medial epicondylitis.一种用于难治性内侧上髁炎诊断及手术修复的有效方法。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.017.
6
Autologous growth factor injections in chronic tendinopathy.自体生长因子注射治疗慢性肌腱病。
J Athl Train. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):428-30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.06. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
The Fascial Elevation and Tendon Origin Resection Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis.用于治疗慢性顽固性内侧上髁炎的筋膜提升和肌腱起点切除术技术
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1731-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514530664. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
8
Open vs Percutaneous vs Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Updated Systematic Review.外侧上髁炎的开放手术、经皮手术与关节镜手术治疗对比:一项更新的系统评价
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun;47(6). doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0043.
9
Open procedure vs. arthroscopic débridement for chronic medial epicondylitis.开放性手术与关节镜下清创术治疗慢性肱骨内上髁炎的对比
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
10
[Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?].[肱骨髁炎:开放性外科手术——何时以及如何治疗外侧和内侧肱骨髁炎?]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 May;52(5):394-403. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04374-6. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Flexor Digitorum Profundus Tendon Repair: A Narrative Review.优化指深屈肌腱修复:一篇叙述性综述。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Mar 11;16(3):97. doi: 10.3390/jfb16030097.
2
Systematic review of surgical techniques for medial epicondylitis: evaluating the impact of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.肱骨内上髁炎手术技术的系统评价:评估术前注射及合并尺神经炎对术后结局的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Sep;107(7):457-468. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2025.0005. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Arthroscopic Medial Bi-portal Extra-articular Debridement for Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis.
关节镜下双切口内侧关节外清创术治疗顽固性内侧上髁炎
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Jan 1;13(3):102876. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.11.004. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Novel Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Epicondylar Sensory Nerve for Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylosis: A Case-Based Technical Report.新型超声引导下射频消融治疗顽固性肱骨内上髁炎的内侧上髁感觉神经:一份基于病例的技术报告。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 7;15(12):e50131. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50131. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
[Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?].[肱骨髁炎:开放性外科手术——何时以及如何治疗外侧和内侧肱骨髁炎?]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 May;52(5):394-403. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04374-6. Epub 2023 Apr 19.