• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自主战胜一切:对居家痴呆症患者护理阻力下护士专业判断的主题分析。

Autonomy conquers all: a thematic analysis of nurses' professional judgement encountering resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08123-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08123-x
PMID:35659660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9167050/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate care support from home health care nurses is needed to meet the needs of an increasing number of home-dwelling persons with dementia and those who resist care. The decisions nurses make in home health care when encountering resistance from persons with dementia have an extensive impact on the quality of care and access to care. There is little research on what influences nurse's encounters with resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia.

RESEARCH AIM

To get insight into how nurses experience resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia.

METHODS

A qualitative research design using a thematic analysis was conducted following the six steps by Braun and Clarke. Data was gathered from three focus group and three individual interviews, and a total of 18 nurses from home health care participated. The interviews took place over a period of 5 months, from December 2020 to April 2021.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research, reference number 515138 and by the research advisers and home care managers in each section of the municipality.

RESULTS

Two main themes were identified: 1) Challenged by complex and inadequate care structures and 2) Adapting care according to circumstances. There were three subthemes within the first main theme: lack of systematic collaboration and understanding, insufficient flexibility to care, and the challenge of privacy. In the second main theme, there were three subthemes: avoid forced treatment and care to protect autonomy, gray-areas of coercive care and reduced care. The two main themes seemed to be interdependent, as challenges and changes in organizational structures influenced how nurses could conduct their care practices.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that nurses' responsibility to decide how to conduct care is downplayed when facing resistance. Further, their professional judgement is influenced by contextual factors and characterized by a strong commitment to avoid forced treatment and care. A continuous challenge is to safeguard shared decision-making at the same time as it is balanced against risks of severe health damage in home-dwelling persons with dementia. A fundamental question to ask is whether autonomy does conquer all, even when severe health damage is at stake.

摘要

背景

需要家庭保健护士提供足够的护理支持,以满足越来越多的居家痴呆症患者和拒绝护理的人的需求。护士在家庭保健中遇到痴呆症患者的抵触时所做的决定,对护理质量和获得护理的机会有广泛的影响。关于影响护士遇到居家痴呆症患者抵触护理的因素的研究甚少。

研究目的

深入了解护士如何应对居家痴呆症患者的抵触护理。

方法

采用主题分析的定性研究设计,按照 Braun 和 Clarke 的六个步骤进行。数据来自三个焦点小组和三个个人访谈,共有 18 名来自家庭保健的护士参与。访谈于 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 4 月期间进行,为期 5 个月。

伦理考虑

获得了挪威研究中心的批准,参考号为 515138,并获得了每个市辖区的研究顾问和家庭保健经理的批准。

结果

确定了两个主要主题:1)受到复杂和不足的护理结构的挑战;2)根据情况调整护理。第一个主要主题下有三个子主题:缺乏系统的协作和理解、照顾的灵活性不足以及隐私的挑战。在第二个主要主题下,有三个子主题:避免强制治疗和护理以保护自主权、强制性护理的灰色地带和减少护理。这两个主要主题似乎相互依存,因为组织结构的挑战和变化影响了护士如何开展护理实践。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,当面临抵触时,护士决定如何进行护理的责任被淡化。此外,他们的专业判断受到情境因素的影响,其特点是强烈承诺避免强制治疗和护理。一个持续的挑战是在保障共同决策的同时,平衡居家痴呆症患者严重健康损害的风险。一个需要提出的基本问题是,即使在严重健康损害的情况下,自主权是否可以战胜一切。

相似文献

1
Autonomy conquers all: a thematic analysis of nurses' professional judgement encountering resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia.自主战胜一切:对居家痴呆症患者护理阻力下护士专业判断的主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08123-x.
2
Trust-building interventions to home-dwelling persons with dementia who resist care.针对拒绝照护的居家痴呆症患者的信任建立干预措施。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):975-989. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041745. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Patient autonomy in home care: Nurses' relational practices of responsibility.居家护理中的患者自主性:护士的责任关系实践。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1638-1653. doi: 10.1177/0969733018772070. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Purchasers' deliberations on psychosocial needs within the process of allocating healthcare services for older home-dwelling persons with dementia: a qualitative study.购买者在为患有痴呆症的居家老年人分配医疗服务过程中对心理社会需求的考量:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3550-7.
5
Forced treatment and care in home-dwelling persons with dementia.对居家痴呆患者的强制治疗与护理。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):372-386. doi: 10.1177/0969733020948107. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Meeting psychosocial needs for persons with dementia in home care services - a qualitative study of different perceptions and practices among health care providers.满足居家护理服务中痴呆症患者的心理社会需求——对医疗保健提供者不同认知与实践的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0612-3.
7
Caregiver decision-making concerning involuntary treatment in dementia care at home.在家庭痴呆症护理中关于非自愿治疗的护理人员决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):330-343. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041742. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Nurses' professional discretion in the purchaser-provider split in home care in Norway.挪威家庭护理中购买方-提供方分离下护士的职业裁量权
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb;80(2):612-627. doi: 10.1111/jan.15828. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
9
Facilitators and barriers to implement nurse-led interventions in long-term dementia care: a qualitative interview study with Swiss nursing experts and managers.在长期痴呆症护理中实施护士主导干预的促进因素和障碍:对瑞士护理专家和管理人员的定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02120-1.
10
Person-centered dementia care in home care services - highly recommended but still challenging to obtain: a qualitative interview study.居家护理服务中的以患者为中心的痴呆症照护 - 强烈推荐但仍难以实现:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06722-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators Concerning Involuntary Oral Care for Individuals with Dementia: A Qualitative Study.痴呆症患者非自愿口腔护理的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;22(3):460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030460.
2
Blurred lines: Ethical challenges related to autonomy in home-based care.模糊的界限:居家护理中与自主性相关的伦理挑战。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Sep;31(6):1156-1171. doi: 10.1177/09697330231215951. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
District nurses' experiences with involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: a qualitative descriptive study.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust-building interventions to home-dwelling persons with dementia who resist care.针对拒绝照护的居家痴呆症患者的信任建立干预措施。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):975-989. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041745. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Person-centered dementia care in home care services - highly recommended but still challenging to obtain: a qualitative interview study.居家护理服务中的以患者为中心的痴呆症照护 - 强烈推荐但仍难以实现:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06722-8.
3
The position of home-care nursing in primary health care: A critical analysis of contemporary policy documents.
社区护士在居家痴呆症护理中进行非自愿治疗的经历:一项质性描述性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 19;22(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01553-w.
4
Perceptions of nurses regarding quality of adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Ghana: a qualitative study.加纳护士对成人心肺复苏质量的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01388-5.
5
Understanding registered nurses' career choices in home care services: a qualitative study.理解注册护士在家庭护理服务中的职业选择:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 21;23(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09259-0.
居家护理在初级卫生保健中的地位:对当代政策文件的批判性分析。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Apr;29(2):e12445. doi: 10.1111/nin.12445. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Staff's perspectives on the organization of homecare services to people with dementia-A qualitative study.工作人员对为痴呆症患者提供居家护理服务组织的看法——一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1797-1804. doi: 10.1002/nop2.822. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Ethical challenges in home-based care: A systematic literature review.家庭护理中的伦理挑战:系统文献回顾。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):628-644. doi: 10.1177/0969733020968859. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Forced treatment and care in home-dwelling persons with dementia.对居家痴呆患者的强制治疗与护理。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):372-386. doi: 10.1177/0969733020948107. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium.在家中进行痴呆症护理中的非自愿治疗:来自荷兰和比利时的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1998-2007. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15457. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
Home-care nurses' distinctive work: A discourse analysis of what takes precedence in changing healthcare services.家庭护理护士的独特工作:对优先改变医疗保健服务的话语分析。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12375. doi: 10.1111/nin.12375. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Risks as dilemmas for home care staff caring for persons with dementia.居家护理人员照顾痴呆症患者的风险:困境与对策。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Sep;25(9):1701-1708. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1758914. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
Prevention and reduction of involuntary treatment at home: A feasibility study of the PRITAH intervention.预防和减少家庭非自愿治疗:PRITAH 干预措施的可行性研究。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;41(5):536-543. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 2.