• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium.在家中进行痴呆症护理中的非自愿治疗:来自荷兰和比利时的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1998-2007. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15457. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
2
Professional and family caregivers' attitudes towards involuntary treatment in community-dwelling people with dementia.专业和家庭照顾者对社区居住的痴呆症患者非自愿治疗的态度。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):96-107. doi: 10.1111/jan.13839. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
The use of involuntary treatment among older adults with cognitive impairment receiving nursing care at home: A cross-sectional study.在家中接受护理的认知障碍老年患者中使用非自愿治疗:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Behind Closed Doors: Involuntary Treatment in Care of Persons with Cognitive Impairment at Home in the Netherlands.闭门之内:荷兰居家认知障碍患者护理中的非自愿治疗
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Feb;64(2):354-8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13946. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Professional caregivers' perceived barriers hindering the prevention and reduction of involuntary treatment among older persons receiving long-term care: A mixed methods study.专业照护者感知到的阻碍老年人接受长期护理时非自愿治疗的预防和减少的障碍:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7175-7192. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16796. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Family caregiver perspectives on social relations of elderly residents with dementia in small-scale versus traditional long-term care settings in the Netherlands and Belgium.家庭照顾者视角下的荷兰和比利时小规模与传统长期护理机构中痴呆老年人的社会关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3106-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04110.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
7
Caregiver decision-making concerning involuntary treatment in dementia care at home.在家庭痴呆症护理中关于非自愿治疗的护理人员决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):330-343. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041742. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
A Quasi-experimental study on prevention and reduction of involuntary treatment at home (PRITAH) in people with dementia.痴呆症患者居家非自愿治疗的预防和减少(PRITAH)的准实验研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Nov;31(21-22):3250-3262. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16163. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
Unmet needs in community-living persons with dementia are common, often non-medical and related to patient and caregiver characteristics.社区居住的痴呆症患者存在未满足的需求较为常见,这些需求通常是非医疗性的,与患者和照护者的特征有关。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Nov;31(11):1643-1654. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002296. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
The consequences of COVID-19 lockdown for formal and informal resource utilization among home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the prospective PAN.DEM study.COVID-19 封锁对居家痴呆症患者正规和非正规资源利用的影响:前瞻性 PAN.DEM 研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07041-8.

引用本文的文献

1
District nurses' experiences with involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: a qualitative descriptive study.社区护士在居家痴呆症护理中进行非自愿治疗的经历:一项质性描述性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 19;22(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01553-w.
2
Prevalence of falls, incontinence, malnutrition, pain, pressure injury and restraints in home care: A narrative review.居家护理中跌倒、尿失禁、营养不良、疼痛、压疮和约束的流行情况:叙述性综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3656-e3669. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14021. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3
Autonomy conquers all: a thematic analysis of nurses' professional judgement encountering resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia.自主战胜一切:对居家痴呆症患者护理阻力下护士专业判断的主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08123-x.
4
Trust-building interventions to home-dwelling persons with dementia who resist care.针对拒绝照护的居家痴呆症患者的信任建立干预措施。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):975-989. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041745. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
A Quasi-experimental study on prevention and reduction of involuntary treatment at home (PRITAH) in people with dementia.痴呆症患者居家非自愿治疗的预防和减少(PRITAH)的准实验研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Nov;31(21-22):3250-3262. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16163. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Caregiver decision-making concerning involuntary treatment in dementia care at home.在家庭痴呆症护理中关于非自愿治疗的护理人员决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):330-343. doi: 10.1177/09697330211041742. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of involuntary treatment among older adults with cognitive impairment receiving nursing care at home: A cross-sectional study.在家中接受护理的认知障碍老年患者中使用非自愿治疗:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Professional and family caregivers' attitudes towards involuntary treatment in community-dwelling people with dementia.专业和家庭照顾者对社区居住的痴呆症患者非自愿治疗的态度。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):96-107. doi: 10.1111/jan.13839. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
Restraint of adults with intellectual disabilities: A critical review of the prevalence and characteristics associated with its use.成年人智力障碍约束:对使用情况及其相关特征的批判性回顾。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):268-283. doi: 10.1177/1744629518778695. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
The Fundamentals of Person-Centered Care for Individuals With Dementia.《面向痴呆症个体的以人为本的护理基础》。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S10-S19. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx122.
5
Restraint Use in Older Adults Receiving Home Care.接受家庭护理的老年人的约束使用情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1769-1776. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14880. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.以患者为中心的护理对痴呆症患者的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Feb 17;12:381-397. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117637. eCollection 2017.
7
Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis.社区中未被发现的痴呆症的患病率及决定因素:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 3;7(2):e011146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011146.
8
Use of physical restraint in hospital patients: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa.南非一家三级医院住院患者身体约束的使用情况:一项描述性研究
Curationis. 2016 Nov 10;39(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1605.
9
[Implementation and (cost-)effectiveness of case management for people with dementia and their informal caregivers: results of the COMPAS study].[痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者的病例管理实施情况及(成本)效益:COMPAS研究结果]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Dec;47(6):223-233. doi: 10.1007/s12439-016-0197-x.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale Among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.认知障碍老年人护理抗拒量表的信效度研究
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

在家中进行痴呆症护理中的非自愿治疗:来自荷兰和比利时的结果。

Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Medicine and Lifesciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Nursing, White Yellow Cross Limburg, Genk, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1998-2007. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15457. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.15457
PMID:32918342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292312/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To gain insight into the request, use and associated factors of involuntary treatment in people with dementia (PwD) receiving professional home care in the Netherlands and Belgium.

BACKGROUND

Most of the PwD remain living at home as long as possible. Due to complex care needs, this can result in an increased risk for care provided against the wishes of the client and/or to which the client resists, referred to as involuntary treatment.

DESIGN

Secondary data analyses of two cross-sectional surveys.

METHODS

Dementia case managers and district nurses filled in a questionnaire for each PwD in their caseload. This study included data of 627 PwD receiving professional home care in the Netherlands and 217 in Belgium. The same methodology (questionnaire and variables) was used in both samples. Descriptive statistics and multi-level logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the data. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

More than half of the PwD (50.7%) living at home received involuntary treatment (Belgium 68.2% and the Netherlands 44.7%). Nonconsensual care (82.7%) was the most common, followed by psychotropic medication (40.7%) and physical restraints (18.5%). Involuntary treatment use was associated with living alone, greater ADL dependency, lower cognitive ability, higher family caregiver burden and receiving home care in Belgium versus the Netherlands. Involuntary treatment was most often requested by family caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Involuntary treatment is often used in PwD, which is in line with previous findings indicating dementia as a risk factor for involuntary treatment use. More research is needed to gain insight into variations in prevalence across other countries, which factors influence these differences and what countries can learn from each other regarding prevention of involuntary treatment.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

To provide person-centred care, it is important to study ways to prevent involuntary treatment in PwD and to stimulate dialogue between professional and family caregivers for alternative interventions.

摘要

目的和目标

深入了解在荷兰和比利时接受专业家庭护理的痴呆症患者(PwD)中,非自愿治疗的请求、使用情况和相关因素。

背景

大多数 PwD 尽可能长时间地留在家里。由于护理需求复杂,这可能会增加违背客户意愿提供护理的风险,或者客户会抗拒这种护理,这被称为非自愿治疗。

设计

两项横断面调查的二次数据分析。

方法

痴呆症个案经理和地区护士为他们的服务对象中的每位 PwD 填写了一份问卷。这项研究包括在荷兰接受专业家庭护理的 627 名 PwD 和在比利时接受护理的 217 名 PwD 的数据。两个样本都使用了相同的方法(问卷和变量)。使用描述性统计和多水平逻辑回归分析来分析数据。研究遵守 STROBE 清单。

结果

超过一半(50.7%)住在家里的 PwD 接受了非自愿治疗(比利时 68.2%,荷兰 44.7%)。非自愿护理(82.7%)最为常见,其次是精神科药物(40.7%)和身体约束(18.5%)。非自愿治疗的使用与独居、更大的 ADL 依赖性、较低的认知能力、更高的家庭照顾者负担以及在比利时而不是荷兰接受家庭护理有关。非自愿治疗通常是由家庭照顾者要求的。

结论

非自愿治疗在 PwD 中经常使用,这与以前的研究结果一致,表明痴呆症是使用非自愿治疗的一个风险因素。需要进一步研究,以了解在其他国家的患病率差异、哪些因素影响这些差异以及各国可以从彼此那里学到什么,以防止非自愿治疗。

临床相关性

为了提供以患者为中心的护理,重要的是研究预防痴呆症患者非自愿治疗的方法,并促进专业人员和家庭照顾者之间的对话,以寻求替代干预措施。