Division of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Allergy & Immunology Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Invest Dermatol. 2022 Nov;142(11):2920-2928.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.05.1059. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions related to first-line antituberculosis drugs are associated with high mortality and long-term morbidity. Oral sequential drug challenge, as a form of drug provocation testing, helps to salvage therapy by identifying culprit drugs but is associated with risk and is costly. IFN-γ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot), an adjunctive in vitro diagnostic tool, may help to guide risk-stratification approaches. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of IFN-γ ELISpot against full-dose sequential drug challenge, we analyzed samples collected prospectively at multiple time points in 32 patients with first-line antituberculosis drug‒associated severe cutaneous adverse reaction (81% HIV infected, 25 with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and 7 with Stevens‒Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis). Sensitivity of IFN-γ ELISpot was 33% (4 of 12), 13% (1 of 8), 11% (1 of 9), and 0% (0 of 4) for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, respectively (positivity threshold ≥50 spot forming units/million cells). Specificity was 100% for all the four drugs. Rifampicin IFN-γ ELISpot sensitivity increased to 58% (7 of 12) if a threshold of 20 spot forming units was used and to 75% (3 of 4) when restricted to samples <12 weeks after acute severe cutaneous adverse reaction event; specificity remained 100% for both. IFN-γ ELISpot offers adequate risk stratification of rifampicin severe cutaneous adverse reaction using acute samples and lowered threshold for positivity. Given the low sensitivity of IFN-γ ELISpot for other first-line antituberculosis drugs, additional optimization is needed to improve risk-stratification potential.
与一线抗结核药物相关的严重皮肤不良反应与高死亡率和长期发病有关。口服序贯药物挑战作为一种药物激发试验形式,有助于通过识别罪魁祸首药物来挽救治疗,但存在风险且成本高昂。IFN-γ 酶联免疫斑点(ELISpot)作为一种辅助的体外诊断工具,可能有助于指导风险分层方法。为了确定 IFN-γ ELISpot 对全剂量序贯药物挑战的诊断准确性,我们分析了前瞻性收集的 32 例一线抗结核药物相关严重皮肤不良反应患者(81% HIV 感染,25 例药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状,7 例 Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症)在多个时间点的样本。IFN-γ ELISpot 的敏感性分别为利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇的 33%(12 例中的 4 例)、13%(8 例中的 1 例)、11%(9 例中的 1 例)和 0%(4 例中的 0 例)(阳性阈值≥50 个斑点形成单位/百万个细胞)。四种药物的特异性均为 100%。如果使用 20 个斑点形成单位的阈值,利福平 IFN-γ ELISpot 的敏感性增加到 58%(12 例中的 7 例),如果将其限制在急性严重皮肤不良反应事件后<12 周的样本中,敏感性增加到 75%(4 例中的 3 例);特异性均保持 100%。IFN-γ ELISpot 可对利福平严重皮肤不良反应进行充分的风险分层,采用急性样本和降低阳性阈值。鉴于 IFN-γ ELISpot 对其他一线抗结核药物的敏感性较低,需要进一步优化以提高风险分层潜力。