• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2004-2014 年欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物上市后要求。

Post-Marketing Requirements for Cancer Drugs Approved by the European Medicines Agency, 2004-2014.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Austrian National Public Health Institute (Gesundheit Österreich GmbH/GÖG), Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Oct;112(4):846-852. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2679. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.2679
PMID:35662000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540185/
Abstract

To address unresolved questions about drug safety and efficacy at the time of approval, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) may require that manufacturers conduct additional studies during the postmarketing period. As a growing proportion of new cancer drugs are approved on the basis of limited evidence of clinical benefit, timely completion of postmarketing requirements is important. We used publicly available regulatory documents to evaluate key characteristics of pivotal studies supporting EMA-approved cancer drugs from 2004-2014 and assessed completion rates of postmarketing data collection requirements after a minimum of 5 years. From 2004-2014, 79% (45/57) of EMA-approved cancer drugs had to fulfill postmarketing requirements. Pivotal trials supporting the approval of cancer drugs with postmarketing requirements were less likely to have randomized designs (41/61, 67% vs. 11/11, 100%), include an active comparator (20/61, 33% vs. 10/11, 91%), or measure overall survival as the primary study end point (18/61, 30% vs. 6/11, 55%) compared with pivotal trials for drugs without postmarketing requirements. Among 200 postmarketing requirements, almost half were designed to assess drug safety. After a minimum of 5 years, 60% (121/200) of requirements were completed, 10% (19/200) were ongoing, and 30% (60/200) were delayed. About half (40/75, 53%) of postmarketing requirements for new clinical studies were completed on time. Delays in the completion of postmarketing requirements often did not impact the likelihood of drugs receiving permanent marketing authorization (87%, 39/45) after 5 years. Our findings highlight the need for EMA to better enforce its authority to require timely completion of postmarketing requirements and studies.

摘要

为了解决药物批准时仍存在的安全性和疗效方面的未决问题,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)可能会要求制造商在上市后期间进行额外的研究。随着越来越多的新癌症药物在临床获益证据有限的基础上获得批准,及时完成上市后要求非常重要。我们使用公开的监管文件评估了 2004 年至 2014 年期间支持 EMA 批准的癌症药物的关键研究的主要特征,并评估了至少 5 年后完成上市后数据收集要求的完成率。2004 年至 2014 年,79%(45/57)的 EMA 批准的癌症药物必须满足上市后要求。支持有上市后要求的癌症药物批准的关键性试验不太可能采用随机设计(41/61,67%比 11/11,100%),包括活性对照(20/61,33%比 10/11,91%),或测量总生存期作为主要研究终点(18/61,30%比 6/11,55%)与没有上市后要求的药物的关键性试验相比。在 200 项上市后要求中,近一半是为了评估药物安全性而设计的。至少 5 年后,完成了 60%(121/200)的要求,10%(19/200)正在进行中,30%(60/200)延迟。大约一半(40/75,53%)的新临床研究的上市后要求按时完成。上市后要求完成的延迟通常不会影响药物在 5 年后获得永久上市授权的可能性(87%,39/45)。我们的研究结果强调了 EMA 加强其要求及时完成上市后要求和研究的权力的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c1/9540185/2019f9488f3a/CPT-112-846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c1/9540185/1a04d1caf577/CPT-112-846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c1/9540185/2019f9488f3a/CPT-112-846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c1/9540185/1a04d1caf577/CPT-112-846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c1/9540185/2019f9488f3a/CPT-112-846-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Post-Marketing Requirements for Cancer Drugs Approved by the European Medicines Agency, 2004-2014.2004-2014 年欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物上市后要求。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Oct;112(4):846-852. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2679. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Comparison of novel oncology drugs that received dual approval from the US accelerated approval and EU conditional marketing authorisation pathways, 2006-2021: a cross-sectional study.2006-2021 年接受美国加速批准和欧盟有条件上市许可途径双重批准的新型肿瘤药物比较:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e069132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069132.
4
Analysis of Postapproval Clinical Trials of Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without Clinical Postmarketing Requirements or Commitments.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗药物的批准后临床试验,这些药物无临床上市后要求或承诺。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3410.
5
Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物对总生存期和生活质量有益的证据可得性:2009 - 2013年药物批准情况的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 4;359:j4530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4530.
6
Completion Rate and Reporting of Mandatory Pediatric Postmarketing Studies Under the US Pediatric Research Equity Act.美国儿科研究公平法案下强制性儿科上市后研究的完成率和报告情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jan 1;173(1):68-74. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3416.
7
Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis.2014-2016 年支持欧洲药品管理局批准癌症药物的随机对照试验的设计特征、偏倚风险和报告:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 18;366:l5221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5221.
8
The use of validated and nonvalidated surrogate endpoints in two European Medicines Agency expedited approval pathways: A cross-sectional study of products authorised 2011-2018.在两个欧洲药品管理局加速审批途径中使用已验证和未验证替代终点:2011-2018 年批准产品的横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 10;16(9):e1002873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002873. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Cancer drugs for solid tumors approved by the EMA since 2014: an overview of pivotal clinical trials.自 2014 年以来欧洲药品管理局批准的实体瘤治疗药物:关键性临床试验概述。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;76(6):843-850. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02850-y. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Progress and Challenges of the New Conditional Approval Process in China: A Pooled Analysis From 2018 to 2021.中国新有条件批准程序的进展与挑战:2018 年至 2021 年的汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2023 Nov;45(11):1111-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the feasibility of post-authorisation RCTs for conditionally authorised anticancer medicines: a multistakeholder perspective from a qualitative focus group study.影响有条件批准抗癌药物上市后 RCT 可行性的因素:来自定性焦点小组研究的多方利益相关者视角。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e084483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084483.
2
Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals.美国市场撤市后日本和欧洲继续批准抗癌药物:加速批准的比较研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13879. doi: 10.1111/cts.13879.
3
Assessment of Surrogate End Point Trends in Clinical Trials to Approve Oncology Drugs From 2001 to 2020 in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval.批准后对新药和新器械生成对比证据。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):998-1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33177-0.
3
Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis.
评估 2001 年至 2020 年日本临床试验中肿瘤药物替代终点趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8875.
4
Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments.肿瘤学试验设计的意义以及疗效-安全性数据的不确定性对卫生技术评估的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;29(8):5774-5791. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080455.
2014-2016 年支持欧洲药品管理局批准癌症药物的随机对照试验的设计特征、偏倚风险和报告:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 18;366:l5221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5221.
4
Postmarketing commitments for novel drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: a cross-sectional analysis.美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物和生物制品的上市后承诺:一项横断面分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 17;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1344-3.
5
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.
6
Timeliness of Postmarket Studies for New Pharmaceuticals Approved Between 2009 and 2012: a Cross-Sectional Analysis.2009年至2012年批准的新型药物上市后研究的及时性:一项横断面分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):492-495. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4779-x.
7
Postmarket studies required by the US Food and Drug Administration for new drugs and biologics approved between 2009 and 2012: cross sectional analysis.2009 年至 2012 年间批准的新药和生物制品的美国食品和药物管理局要求的上市后研究: 横断面分析。
BMJ. 2018 May 24;361:k2031. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2031.
8
Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物对总生存期和生活质量有益的证据可得性:2009 - 2013年药物批准情况的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 4;359:j4530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4530.
9
The Fate of FDA Postapproval Studies.美国食品药品监督管理局批准后研究的命运
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1114-1117. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1705800.
10
Post-marketing research and its outcome for novel anticancer agents approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: A cross-sectional study.2005年至2010年间获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的新型抗癌药物的上市后研究及其结果:一项横断面研究。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;142(2):414-423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31061. Epub 2017 Oct 12.