Park Donghwi, Kim Jung Soo, Heo Sung Jae
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Aug 1;145(8):730-734. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1437.
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has been suggested to be a valuable technique for identifying the obstruction site associated with sleep-disordered breathing. However, the reliability of DISE findings is controversial because the procedure uses sedative drugs, which may have implications for the obstruction patterns observed on DISE.
To compare the obstruction patterns during DISE with the obstruction patterns during natural sleep endoscopy (NSE).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2013 and May 2018 in Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital in Daegu, South Korea. All analysis took place from June 1 to July 31, 2018. Participants had an obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis, were older than 18 years, and had an apnea hypopnea index higher than 5 on type I polysomnography. The patients initially enrolled were excluded from the study for not reaching adequate sleep depth and waking up during insertion of the nasopharyngoscope.
Patients underwent DISE using midazolam and NSE without sedatives on 2 different days.
Obstruction findings were observed only in the same range (65-75) of the bispectral index on both days. Obstruction findings were classified according to the VOTE (velum, oropharynx lateral wall, tongue base, and epiglottis) classification. The extent of agreement between DISE and NSE findings was evaluated using Cohen weighted κ value.
The study included 26 patients with snoring or obstructive sleep apnea (mean [SD] age, 44.7 [10.3] years; predominantly male [22 (85%)]). The mean (SD) apnea hypopnea index was 41.9 (17.2) and the lowest mean (SD) oxygen saturation was 79.8% (12.2%). The degree of agreement in upper-airway obstruction between DISE and NSE was 76.9% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.02-0.83) in the velum, 88.5% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01) in the oropharynx lateral wall, 69.2% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86) in the tongue base, and 92.3% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.24-1.11) in the epiglottis. Agreement of configuration of the velum was 88.5% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.50; 95% CI, -0.03 to 1.03) and the epiglottis was 92.3% (Cohen weighted κ = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.24-1.11).
Obstruction patterns of the upper airway appeared to be in agreement between DISE and NSE, suggesting that DISE may be a reliable test; future studies of multiple positions and sleep stages with larger sample sizes may confirm these results.
药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)被认为是识别与睡眠呼吸障碍相关的阻塞部位的一种有价值的技术。然而,DISE结果的可靠性存在争议,因为该检查使用镇静药物,这可能会影响在DISE上观察到的阻塞模式。
比较DISE期间的阻塞模式与自然睡眠内镜检查(NSE)期间的阻塞模式。
设计、设置和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究于2013年6月至2018年5月在韩国大邱庆北国立大学奇尔库克医院进行。所有分析于2018年6月1日至7月31日进行。参与者被诊断为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,年龄超过18岁,且在I型多导睡眠图上呼吸暂停低通气指数高于5。最初纳入的患者因未达到足够的睡眠深度且在插入鼻咽镜时醒来而被排除在研究之外。
患者在2个不同日期分别接受使用咪达唑仑的DISE和不使用镇静剂的NSE。
仅在两天的脑电双频指数相同范围(65 - 75)内观察阻塞结果。阻塞结果根据VOTE(软腭、口咽侧壁、舌根和会厌)分类进行分类。使用Cohen加权κ值评估DISE和NSE结果之间的一致性程度。
该研究纳入了26例打鼾或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者(平均[标准差]年龄,44.7[10.3]岁;男性居多[22例(85%)])。平均(标准差)呼吸暂停低通气指数为41.9(17.2),最低平均(标准差)血氧饱和度为79.8%(12.2%)。DISE和NSE在上气道阻塞方面的一致程度在软腭为76.9%(Cohen加权κ = 0.42;95%CI,0.02 - 0.83),口咽侧壁为88.5%(Cohen加权κ = 0.84;95%CI,0.67 - 1.01),舌根为69.2%(Cohen加权κ = 0.66;95%CI,0.46 - 0.86),会厌为92.3%(Cohen加权κ = 某值;95%CI,0.24 - 1.11)。软腭形态的一致性为88.5%(Cohen加权κ = 0.50;95%CI, - 0.03至1.03),会厌为92.3%(Cohen加权κ = 0.67;95%CI,0.24 - 1.11)。
DISE和NSE在上气道阻塞模式上似乎一致,表明DISE可能是一项可靠的检查;未来对多个体位和睡眠阶段进行的更大样本量研究可能会证实这些结果。