• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于获取医疗器械真实世界证据的多机构分布式数据网络:将唯一设备标识符纳入纵向数据(BUILD)。

Multi-institutional distributed data networks for real-world evidence about medical devices: building unique device identifiers into longitudinal data (BUILD).

作者信息

Drozda Joseph P, Graham Jove, Muhlestein Joseph B, Tcheng James E, Roach James, Forsyth Tom, Knight Stacey, McKinnon Andrew, May Heidi, Wilson Natalia A, Berlin Jesse A, Simard Edgar P

机构信息

Mercy, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA.

Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2022 May 25;5(2):ooac035. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac035. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac035
PMID:35663113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9154019/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To support development of a robust postmarket device evaluation system using real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) and other sources, employing unique device identifiers (UDIs) to link to device information.

METHODS

To create consistent device-related EHR RWD across 3 institutions, we established a distributed data network and created UDI-enriched research databases (UDIRs) employing a common data model comprised of 24 tables and 472 fields. To test the system, patients receiving coronary stents between 2010 and 2019 were loaded into each institution's UDIR to support distributed queries without sharing identifiable patient information. The ability of the system to execute queries was tested with 3 quality assurance checks. To demonstrate face validity of the data, a retrospective survival study of patients receiving zotarolimus or everolimus stents from 2012 to 2017 was performed using distributed analysis. Propensity score matching was used to compare risk of 6 cardiovascular outcomes within 12 months postimplantation.

RESULTS

The test queries established network functionality. In the analysis, we identified 9141 patients (Mercy = 4905, Geisinger = 4109, Intermountain = 127); mean age 65 ± 12 years, 69% males, 23% zotarolimus. Separate matched analyses at the 3 institutions showed hazard ratio estimates (zotarolimus vs everolimus) of 0.85-1.59 for subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention ( = .14-.52), 1.06-2.03 for death ( = .16-.78) and 0.94-1.40 for the composite endpoint ( = .16-.62).

DISCUSSION

The analysis results are consistent with clinical studies comparing these devices.

CONCLUSION

This project shows that multi-institutional data networks can provide clinically relevant real-world evidence via distributed analysis while maintaining data privacy.

摘要

目的

利用来自电子健康记录(EHR)和其他来源的真实世界数据(RWD),支持开发一个强大的上市后设备评估系统,采用唯一设备标识符(UDI)来链接设备信息。

方法

为了在3个机构中创建与设备相关的一致的EHR RWD,我们建立了一个分布式数据网络,并使用由24个表和472个字段组成的通用数据模型创建了富含UDI的研究数据库(UDIR)。为了测试该系统,将2010年至2019年间接受冠状动脉支架植入的患者加载到每个机构的UDIR中,以支持分布式查询,同时不共享可识别的患者信息。通过3次质量保证检查来测试系统执行查询的能力。为了证明数据的表面效度,使用分布式分析对2012年至2017年间接受佐他莫司或依维莫司支架植入的患者进行了回顾性生存研究。倾向得分匹配用于比较植入后12个月内6种心血管结局的风险。

结果

测试查询建立了网络功能。在分析中,我们识别出9141名患者(Mercy机构 = 4905名,Geisinger机构 = 4109名,Intermountain机构 = 127名);平均年龄65±12岁,69%为男性,23%使用佐他莫司。在3个机构分别进行匹配分析显示,对于后续经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,佐他莫司与依维莫司相比的风险比估计值为0.85 - 1.59(P = 0.14 - 0.52),对于死亡为1.06 - 2.03(P = 0.16 - 0.78),对于复合终点为0.94 - 1.40(P = 0.16 - 0.62)。

讨论

分析结果与比较这些设备的临床研究一致。

结论

该项目表明,多机构数据网络可以通过分布式分析提供临床相关的真实世界证据,同时保持数据隐私。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/9f2cf66ae1f0/ooac035f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/c2cba4df6deb/ooac035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/606fcf34a5b9/ooac035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/8a96fa733ae0/ooac035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/cbeed4b2a391/ooac035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/9f2cf66ae1f0/ooac035f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/c2cba4df6deb/ooac035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/606fcf34a5b9/ooac035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/8a96fa733ae0/ooac035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/cbeed4b2a391/ooac035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/9154019/9f2cf66ae1f0/ooac035f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-institutional distributed data networks for real-world evidence about medical devices: building unique device identifiers into longitudinal data (BUILD).用于获取医疗器械真实世界证据的多机构分布式数据网络:将唯一设备标识符纳入纵向数据(BUILD)。
JAMIA Open. 2022 May 25;5(2):ooac035. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac035. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Constructing the informatics and information technology foundations of a medical device evaluation system: a report from the FDA unique device identifier demonstration.构建医疗器械评估系统的信息学和信息技术基础:来自 FDA 独特器械标识符示范的报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):111-120. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx041.
3
Unique device identifiers for coronary stent postmarket surveillance and research: a report from the Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Epidemiology Network Unique Device Identifier demonstration.冠状动脉支架上市后监测与研究的唯一设备标识符:来自美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械流行病学网络唯一设备标识符示范项目的报告
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):405-413.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
4
Three-year patient-related and stent-related outcomes of second-generation everolimus-eluting Xience V stents versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in real-world practice (from the Multicenter Prospective EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea Registries).在真实临床实践中(来自多中心前瞻性EXCELLENT和RESOLUTE - 韩国注册研究),第二代依维莫司洗脱Xience V支架与佐他莫司洗脱Resolute支架的三年患者相关及支架相关结局对比
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 1;114(9):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.065. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
5
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.在所有需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中(荷兰 PEERS 研究),第三代佐他莫司洗脱和依维莫司洗脱支架的应用:一项随机、单盲、多中心、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):413-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62037-1. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.非常薄的支撑物可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱支架与全人群冠心病使用耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(BIO-RESORT):一项三臂、随机、非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
8
Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial.佐他莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的比较:RESOLUTE 全人群试验的5年最终报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e002230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230.
9
Everolimus-eluting Xience v/Promus versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in patients with diabetes mellitus.依维莫司洗脱 Xience v/Promus 支架与佐他莫司洗脱 Resolute 支架在糖尿病患者中的应用比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):471-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.201.
10
Evaluation of the Privacy Risks of Personal Health Identifiers and Quasi-Identifiers in a Distributed Research Network: Development and Validation Study.分布式研究网络中个人健康标识符和准标识符的隐私风险评估:开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 31;9(5):e24940. doi: 10.2196/24940.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Possibility of Medical Device Surveillance in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis Using a Common Data Model.使用通用数据模型探索腹膜透析患者医疗设备监测的可能性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 28;61(5):814. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050814.
2
Testing a Cloud-Based Model for Active Surveillance of Medical Devices with Analyses of Coronary Stent Safety Using the Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis (DELTA) System.使用数据提取与纵向趋势分析(DELTA)系统对基于云的医疗设备主动监测模型进行测试,并分析冠状动脉支架安全性。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Feb 27;17:97-105. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S445160. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How real-world evidence can really deliver: a case study of data source development and use.真实世界证据如何才能真正发挥作用:一个数据源开发与应用的案例研究
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020 Mar 24;2(1):e000024. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000024. eCollection 2020.
2
Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: A Health System Roadmap to Implement Unique Device Identification at the Point of Care.提高医疗设备周围的患者安全:在医疗点实施唯一设备标识的卫生系统路线图。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Nov 30;14:411-421. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S339232. eCollection 2021.
3
The FDA Sentinel Initiative - An Evolving National Resource.
Exploring unique device identifier implementation and use for real-world evidence: a mixed-methods study with NESTcc health system network collaborators.
探索独特设备标识符在真实世界证据中的实施与应用:一项与NESTcc卫生系统网络合作伙伴开展的混合方法研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Jan 23;5(1):e000167. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167. eCollection 2023.
4
Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: Barriers, Strategies, and Next Steps in Health System Implementation of Unique Device Identifiers.提升围绕医疗设备的患者安全:医疗系统实施唯一设备标识符的障碍、策略及后续步骤
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Jun 21;15:177-186. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S364539. eCollection 2022.
美国食品药品监督管理局哨点计划——一项不断发展的国家资源。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2091-2093. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1809643.
4
Constructing the informatics and information technology foundations of a medical device evaluation system: a report from the FDA unique device identifier demonstration.构建医疗器械评估系统的信息学和信息技术基础:来自 FDA 独特器械标识符示范的报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):111-120. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx041.
5
The Mercy unique device identifier demonstration project: Implementing point of use product identification in the cardiac catheterization laboratories of a regional health system. Mercy 独特设备标识符示范项目:在区域卫生系统的心脏导管实验室实施使用点产品识别。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Jun;4(2):116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
6
Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial.佐他莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的比较:RESOLUTE 全人群试验的5年最终报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e002230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230.
7
The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration.健康维护组织研究网络虚拟数据仓库:支持协作的公共数据模型。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Mar 24;2(1):1049. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1049. eCollection 2014.
8
Unique device identifiers for coronary stent postmarket surveillance and research: a report from the Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Epidemiology Network Unique Device Identifier demonstration.冠状动脉支架上市后监测与研究的唯一设备标识符:来自美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械流行病学网络唯一设备标识符示范项目的报告
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):405-413.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
9
A randomized comparison of platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents versus cobalt chromium-based Zotarolimus-Eluting stents in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: HOST-ASSURE (harmonizing optimal strategy for treatment of coronary artery stenosis-safety & effectiveness of drug-eluting stents & anti-platelet regimen), a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.随机比较全人群经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用基于铂铬的依维莫司洗脱支架与基于钴铬的佐他莫司洗脱支架:HOST-ASSURE(优化治疗冠状动脉狭窄策略的协调性研究-药物洗脱支架和抗血小板方案的安全性和有效性),一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt A):2805-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 May 7.
10
Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.在所有需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中(荷兰 PEERS 研究),第三代佐他莫司洗脱和依维莫司洗脱支架的应用:一项随机、单盲、多中心、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):413-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62037-1. Epub 2013 Oct 31.