Suppr超能文献

使用数据提取与纵向趋势分析(DELTA)系统对基于云的医疗设备主动监测模型进行测试,并分析冠状动脉支架安全性。

Testing a Cloud-Based Model for Active Surveillance of Medical Devices with Analyses of Coronary Stent Safety Using the Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis (DELTA) System.

作者信息

Drozda Joseph P, Ssemaganda Henry, Frankenberger Edward A, Brandt Eric, Robbins Susan, Khairnar Neha, Cha Alexandra, Resnic Frederic S

机构信息

Retiree, Mercy, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Feb 27;17:97-105. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S445160. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the use of the Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis (DELTA) system in the National Evaluation System for health Technology's (NEST) medical device surveillance cloud environment by analyzing coronary stent safety using real world clinical data and comparing results to clinical trial findings.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Electronic health record (EHR) data from two health systems, the Social Security Death Master File, and device databases were ingested into the NEST cloud, and safety analyses of two stents were performed using DELTA.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

This is an observational study of patients receiving zotarolimus drug-eluting coronary stents (ZES) or everolimus eluting coronary stents (EES) between July 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 3334 patients receiving EES and 1002 receiving ZES were available for study. Analysis using inverse probability weighting showed no significant difference in one-year mortality or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) for EES compared to ZES [Mortality Odds Ratio 0.94 (95% CI 0.81-1.175); p = 0.780] [MACE Odds Ratio 1.04 (95% CI 0.92-1.16; p = 0.551]). Analysis using propensity matching showed no significant difference in EES one-year mortality (547 of 992 alive and available after censoring) compared to ZES (546 of 992) [Log-Rank statistic 0.3348 (p = 0.563)].

CONCLUSION

Automated cloud-based medical device safety surveillance using EHR data is feasible and was efficiently performed using DELTA. No statistically significant differences in 1-year safety outcomes between ZES and EES were identified using two statistical approaches, consistent with randomized trial findings.

摘要

目的

通过使用真实世界临床数据分析冠状动脉支架安全性,并将结果与临床试验结果进行比较,展示数据提取与纵向趋势分析(DELTA)系统在国家卫生技术评估系统(NEST)的医疗设备监测云环境中的应用。

设计与背景

来自两个卫生系统的电子健康记录(EHR)数据、社会保障死亡主文件和设备数据库被录入NEST云,并使用DELTA对两种支架进行安全性分析。

参与者与干预措施

这是一项对2015年7月1日至2017年12月31日期间接受佐他莫司药物洗脱冠状动脉支架(ZES)或依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架(EES)的患者进行的观察性研究。

结果

排除后,共有3334例接受EES的患者和1002例接受ZES的患者可供研究。使用逆概率加权分析显示,与ZES相比,EES在一年死亡率或主要不良心脏事件(MACE)方面无显著差异[死亡率优势比0.94(95%可信区间0.81 - 1.175);p = 0.780][MACE优势比1.04(95%可信区间0.92 - 1.16;p = 0.551)]。使用倾向匹配分析显示,与ZES(992例中546例)相比,EES一年死亡率(审查后992例中547例存活且可用)无显著差异[对数秩统计量0.3348(p = 0.563)]。

结论

使用EHR数据进行基于云的自动化医疗设备安全监测是可行的,并且使用DELTA能够高效完成。使用两种统计方法均未发现ZES和EES在1年安全性结局上存在统计学显著差异,这与随机试验结果一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/253c/10908332/62924341643b/MDER-17-97-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验