Raunbak Sabine Michelsen, Sørensen Anne Sig, Hansen Louise, Skjøth Flemming, Larsen Torben Bjerregaard, Ehlers Lars Holger
Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Danish Health Technology Council, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Jul;6(4):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00337-3. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
Patient self-managed anticoagulant treatment with warfarin (PSM) has been proposed as an alternative to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, direct evidence on the cost effectiveness of PSM compared with DOACs is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of PSM versus DOACs for NVAF patients in the Danish healthcare setting using a model-based cost-utility analysis.
A cost-utility analysis was performed using a decision-analytic model including two treatment alternatives: continuous PSM and DOACs. The analysis was performed from an extended Danish healthcare sector perspective, including patient-paid costs of medication related to the anticoagulant treatment, with a lifetime horizon. Inputs for the model comprised of probabilities of events, costs in Danish estimates, when possible, and effect in utilities. The probabilities of events are primarily based on real-life data from a direct comparison of PSM and DOACs. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with an assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the robustness of the results.
The base-analysis showed that PSM was dominant, with a decreased cost of £8495 and an increased QALY accumulation of 0.23 per patient (ICER = -£36,935/QALY). All deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated that PSM was dominant or at least cost effective. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 95% of the iterations were cost effective.
The present study found that PSM is dominant (i.e., both more effective and cost saving) compared with DOACs, adding to the scarce evidence of the comparative cost effectiveness of PSM and DOACs in NVAF.
对于非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者,已提出华法林患者自我管理抗凝治疗(PSM)作为直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的替代方案;然而,缺乏PSM与DOACs相比成本效益的直接证据。我们旨在使用基于模型的成本效用分析,评估丹麦医疗环境中NVAF患者PSM与DOACs的成本效益。
使用决策分析模型进行成本效用分析,该模型包括两种治疗方案:持续PSM和DOACs。分析从丹麦扩展医疗部门的角度进行,包括患者支付的与抗凝治疗相关的药物成本,时间范围为终身。模型的输入包括事件概率、尽可能以丹麦估计值表示的成本以及效用方面的效果。事件概率主要基于PSM和DOACs直接比较的实际数据。结果以增量成本效益比(ICER)表示,假定成本效益阈值为20,000英镑/质量调整生命年(QALY)。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析以研究结果的稳健性。
基础分析表明PSM占主导地位,每位患者成本降低8495英镑,QALY积累增加0.23(ICER = -36,935英镑/QALY)。所有确定性敏感性分析均表明PSM占主导地位或至少具有成本效益。概率敏感性分析表明,95%的迭代具有成本效益。
本研究发现,与DOACs相比,PSM占主导地位(即更有效且成本更低),这为NVAF中PSM和DOACs比较成本效益的稀缺证据增添了内容。