• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白化豚鼠和有色豚鼠不同短时间噪声暴露的比较。

Comparison of various short noise exposures in albino and pigmented guinea pigs.

作者信息

Pye A

出版信息

Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1987;243(6):411-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00464654.

DOI:10.1007/BF00464654
PMID:3566626
Abstract

Albino and pigmented guinea pigs were exposed to 20 kHz at 120 dB SPL for exposure durations of 30, 7.5, 6.5, 5 and 3.25 min. In a second series of experiments, the two shortest exposures were repeated after an interval of 6 or 24 h. Sensory hair cell loss was assessed 3 weeks post-exposure by surface preparations and quantified as percentage cell loss per segment per row, total numbers of outer and inner hair cells lost and the area of total outer hair cell damage. A variable but discrete area of damage resulted from these exposures. The main differences between the two strains were that in albino guinea pigs fewer ears were damaged after the shortest single exposures and generally more damage occurred after repeated exposures. However, no differences were detected in either strain when the interval between repeated exposures was changed.

摘要

将白化豚鼠和有色豚鼠暴露于120分贝声压级的20千赫声音中,暴露持续时间分别为30、7.5、6.5、5和3.25分钟。在第二组实验中,间隔6或24小时后重复进行两次最短时间的暴露。暴露3周后,通过表面制备评估感觉毛细胞损失情况,并量化为每行每段的细胞损失百分比、损失的外毛细胞和内毛细胞总数以及外毛细胞总损伤面积。这些暴露导致了不同但离散的损伤区域。两种品系之间的主要差异在于,在白化豚鼠中,单次最短暴露后受损的耳朵较少,而重复暴露后通常损伤更多。然而,当改变重复暴露之间的间隔时,在任何一个品系中均未检测到差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of various short noise exposures in albino and pigmented guinea pigs.白化豚鼠和有色豚鼠不同短时间噪声暴露的比较。
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1987;243(6):411-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00464654.
2
The effects of short noise exposures in the guinea pig.短时间噪声暴露对豚鼠的影响。
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;240(2):107-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00453467.
3
Sensory hair cell damage from high frequency noise exposure.高频噪声暴露导致的感觉毛细胞损伤。
Br J Audiol. 1984 Nov;18(4):231-6. doi: 10.3109/03005368409078953.
4
[Hair cells apoptosis and the activation of P53 protein in intensive impulse noise induced cochlear lesion].[强脉冲噪声致耳蜗损伤中毛细胞凋亡及P53蛋白激活]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;46(1):54-8.
5
Relation of focal hair-cell lesions to noise-exposure parameters from a 4- or a 0.5-kHz octave band of noise.来自4千赫或0.5千赫倍频程噪声频段的局灶性毛细胞病变与噪声暴露参数的关系。
Hear Res. 2009 Aug;254(1-2):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
6
Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.次声对暴露于4kHz倍频程噪声所致耳蜗损伤的影响。
Hear Res. 2007 Mar;225(1-2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
7
Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures.
Hear Res. 1983 Jan;9(1):55-70. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90134-x.
8
Degeneration in the cochlea after noise damage: primary versus secondary events.噪声损伤后耳蜗的退变:原发性与继发性事件
Am J Otol. 2000 Jul;21(4):505-9.
9
Noise-induced hair-cell loss and total exposure energy: analysis of a large data set.噪声诱导的毛细胞损失与总暴露能量:大数据集分析
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2207-20. doi: 10.1121/1.1689961.
10
Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs?豚鼠暴露于实际工业噪声后,畸变产物耳声发射振幅变化与毛细胞损伤之间是否存在密切关系?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Jun;262(6):488-95. doi: 10.1007/s00405-004-0864-3. Epub 2004 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of initial and permanent surface changes to guinea pig hair cells after acoustic overstimulation.
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1989;246(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00454127.

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic trauma effects with varying exposure times.不同暴露时间的声学创伤效应。
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1981;230(3):265-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00456328.
2
Acoustic overstimulation and cochlear nonlinearities.声学过度刺激与耳蜗非线性
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1982;16:95-109.
3
Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures.
Hear Res. 1983 Jan;9(1):55-70. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90134-x.
4
Use of albino animals for auditory research.白化动物在听觉研究中的应用。
Hear Res. 1984 Feb;13(2):201-2. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90109-6.
5
Noise-induced cochlear damage assessed using electrophysiological and morphological criteria: an examination of the equal energy principle.使用电生理和形态学标准评估噪声性耳蜗损伤:对等效能量原则的检验。
Hear Res. 1983 Sep;11(3):327-41. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90065-5.
6
The effects of short noise exposures in the guinea pig.短时间噪声暴露对豚鼠的影响。
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;240(2):107-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00453467.
7
Relation of structural damage to exposure time and intensity in acoustic trauma.
Acta Otolaryngol. 1973 Feb-Mar;75(2):220-6. doi: 10.3109/00016487309139699.
8
Acoustic trauma effects from doubling the exposure time.暴露时间加倍会产生声学创伤效应。
Br J Audiol. 1978 May;12(2):51-3. doi: 10.3109/03005367809078853.