• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法的生存率:ZUMA-1 随访数据验证生存率模型

Predicting Survival for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Validation of Survival Models Using Follow-Up Data From ZUMA-1.

机构信息

Kite, a Gilead Company, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, England, UK; Department of Medicine, University College London, England, UK.

Delta Hat Ltd, Nottingham, England, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.015. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.015
PMID:35667774
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Survival extrapolation for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies is challenging, owing to their unique mechanistic properties that translate to complex hazard functions. Axicabtagene ciloleucel is indicated for the treatment of relapse or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after 2 or more lines of therapy based on the ZUMA-1 trial. Four data snapshots are available, with minimum follow-up of 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. This analysis explores how survival extrapolations for axicabtagene ciloleucel using ZUMA-1 data can be validated and compared.

METHODS

Three different parametric modeling approaches were applied: standard parametric, spline-based, and cure-based models. Models were compared using a range of metrics, across the 4 data snapshot, including visual fit, plausibility of long-term estimates, statistical goodness of fit, inspection of hazard plots, point-estimate accuracy, and conditional survival estimates.

RESULTS

Standard and spline-based parametric extrapolations were generally incapable of fitting the ZUMA-1 data well. Cure-based models provided the best fit based on the earliest data snapshot, with extrapolations remaining consistent as data matured. At 48 months, the maximum survival overestimate was 8.3% (Gompertz mixture-cure model) versus the maximum underestimate of 33.5% (Weibull standard parametric model).

CONCLUSIONS

Where a plateau in the survival curve is clinically plausible, cure-based models may be helpful in making accurate predictions based on immature data. The ability to reliably extrapolate from maturing data may reduce delays in patient access to potentially lifesaving treatments. Additional research is required to understand how models compare in broader contexts, including different treatments and therapeutic areas.

摘要

目的

由于嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法具有独特的作用机制,转化为复杂的风险函数,因此其生存外推具有挑战性。Axicabtagene ciloleucel 基于 ZUMA-1 试验,被批准用于治疗二线或以上治疗后复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤。目前有 4 个数据快照,随访时间至少为 12、24、36 和 48 个月。本分析探讨了如何使用 ZUMA-1 数据验证和比较 axicabtagene ciloleucel 的生存外推。

方法

应用了三种不同的参数建模方法:标准参数、基于样条的和基于治愈的模型。使用一系列指标在 4 个数据快照中比较了模型,包括视觉拟合、长期估计的合理性、统计拟合优度、风险图检查、点估计准确性和条件生存估计。

结果

标准和基于样条的参数外推通常无法很好地拟合 ZUMA-1 数据。基于治愈的模型基于最早的数据快照提供了最佳拟合,随着数据成熟,外推保持一致。在 48 个月时,最大生存高估为 8.3%(Gompertz 混合治愈模型),最大低估为 33.5%(Weibull 标准参数模型)。

结论

在生存曲线出现平台的情况下,治愈模型可能有助于根据不成熟的数据做出准确预测。从成熟数据中可靠外推的能力可能会减少患者获得潜在救生治疗的延迟。需要进一步研究来了解模型在更广泛的背景下如何比较,包括不同的治疗方法和治疗领域。

相似文献

1
Predicting Survival for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Validation of Survival Models Using Follow-Up Data From ZUMA-1.预测嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法的生存率:ZUMA-1 随访数据验证生存率模型
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.015. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Long-term Survival and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs Chemotherapy for Treatment of B-Cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛治疗与化疗治疗 B 细胞淋巴瘤的长期生存和成本效益比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190035. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0035.
3
Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial.阿基仑赛注射液治疗难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的长期安全性和疗效(ZUMA-1):一项单臂、多中心、1-2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.在美国,对于经过二线或多线系统性治疗后复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成年患者,与 lisocabtagene maraleucel 相比,axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):541-551. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2065787.
5
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Clinical Data for the Use of CAR T-cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛注射液:嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的临床数据。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Mar;55(3):390-405. doi: 10.1177/1060028020944233. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Estimating Long-Term Survival for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy: A Comparison of Standard and Mixture Cure Models.嵌合抗原受体治疗复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的长期生存估计:标准和混合治愈模型的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Apr;39(3):294-298. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18820535. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
Development and Use of the Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Review.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法 Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的研发与应用:综述。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):281-290. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3869.
8
Evaluation of survival extrapolation in immuno-oncology using multiple pre-planned data cuts: learnings to aid in model selection.使用多次预先计划的数据切割评估免疫肿瘤学中的生存外推:辅助模型选择的经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 6;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00997-x.
9
Cost effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the United States.在美国,对于接受过两线或以上系统治疗后复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成年患者,与 tisagenlecleucel 相比,axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):458-468. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1901721.
10
Integrating expert opinion with clinical trial data to extrapolate long-term survival: a case study of CAR-T therapy for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.将专家意见与临床试验数据相结合以推断长期生存:以 CAR-T 疗法治疗复发或难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿童和青年为例的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0823-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Role and Policy Implications of Using External Evidence in Survival Extrapolations: A Case Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Therapy for Second-Line DLBCL.评估外部证据在生存外推中的作用及政策影响:以阿基仑赛治疗二线弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤为例
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01529-5.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treatment Pathways in the United States.美国弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗途径的成本效益分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jun 25;10(1):23814683251345780. doi: 10.1177/23814683251345780. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Beyond hazard ratios: appropriate statistical methods for quantifying the clinical effectiveness of immune-oncology therapies - the example of the Netherlands.
超越风险比:免疫肿瘤疗法临床效果量化的适当统计方法 - 以荷兰为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02373-5.
4
Mixture and Non-mixture Cure Models for Health Technology Assessment: What You Need to Know.用于卫生技术评估的混合与非混合治愈模型:你需要了解的内容。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Oct;42(10):1073-1090. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01406-7. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Cost-utility analysis of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care in Japan based on the ZUMA-7 trial.基于 ZUMA-7 试验的二线 axicabtagene ciloleucel 与标准治疗的日本成本-效用分析。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(30):2279-2291. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2351353. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
6
An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma patients in the United States.美国二线大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中 axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益分析更新
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):77-83. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2290832. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
7
Retrospective Comparison of Survival Projections for CAR T-Cell Therapies in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.大B细胞淋巴瘤中CAR T细胞疗法生存预测的回顾性比较
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Nov;7(6):941-950. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00435-w. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.在美国,阿基仑赛二线治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益:ZUMA-7 试验的经济学评价。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):750.e1-750.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 12.