Suppr超能文献

基于 ZUMA-7 试验的二线 axicabtagene ciloleucel 与标准治疗的日本成本-效用分析。

Cost-utility analysis of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care in Japan based on the ZUMA-7 trial.

机构信息

Gilead Sciences Japan, 1-9-2 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-6616, Japan.

National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2024;20(30):2279-2291. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2351353. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Abstract

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with standard of care (SoC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue for responders) for second-line (2L) treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) in the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial data from a Japanese payer perspective. A three-state partitioned survival model was utilized using population and clinical inputs from the ZUMA-7 trial data over a lifetime horizon. Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2.06) and higher incremental total costs ($48,685.59/¥6.9 million) leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,590.34/¥3.3 million per quality-adjusted life-years compared with SoC. Axi-cel is a cost-effective treatment alternative to SoC for 2L treatment of adults with r/r LBCL.

摘要

从日本支付方角度,在关键性 ZUMA-7 试验数据中,针对二线(2L)治疗复发性或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(r/r LBCL)成人患者,将 axi-cel(axicabtagene ciloleucel)与标准治疗(SoC;挽救性化疗免疫治疗,随后对有应答者进行大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞解救)进行成本效果分析。采用三状态分区生存模型,使用来自 ZUMA-7 试验数据的人群和临床输入,在终生范围内进行分析。与 SoC 相比,axi-cel 与更高的增量质量调整生命年(2.06)和更高的增量总成本(48685.59 美元/6900 万日元)相关,增量成本效果比为 23590.34 美元/3300 万日元/质量调整生命年。对于 r/r LBCL 成人患者的 2L 治疗,axi-cel 是 SoC 的一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a595/11509007/826c6ad341e4/IFON_A_2351353_F0001_C.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验