Mcnally Ryan John, Farukh Bushra, Chowienczyk Phil J, Faconti Luca
British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2022 Jan-Mar;32(1):6-11. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_56_21. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
We investigated the sensitivity and reproducibility of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters and superior vena cava (SVC) flow velocities in detecting changes in cardiac preload in clinically euvolemic subjects with hypertension.
Measurements were obtained during passive leg raising (PLR) and lower limb venous occlusion (LVO), interventions which respectively transiently increase and decrease cardiac preload. Measurements were made in 36 subjects and repeated on two separate occasions to examine reproducibility.
During PLR, there was no significant change in IVC diameters, but peak flow velocity of the SVC S wave increased by 6.5 (95% confidence interval 1.6-11.3) cm/s ( = 0.01). During LVO, IVC diameter in expiration decreased by 3.2 (1.7-4.7) mm and the SVC S wave decreased by 9.7 (4.4-14.7) cm/s ( < 0.001). Venae cavae-derived indices can be used to assess changes in preload within the physiological range in euvolemia.
Despite suboptimal reproducibility of baseline measurements, high agreeability between the changes in IVC diameter and SVC flow after LVO suggests that these indices can be used to monitor changes in cardiac preload.
我们研究了在临床上血容量正常的高血压患者中,下腔静脉(IVC)直径和上腔静脉(SVC)血流速度在检测心脏前负荷变化方面的敏感性和可重复性。
在被动抬腿(PLR)和下肢静脉闭塞(LVO)期间进行测量,这两种干预措施分别会短暂增加和减少心脏前负荷。对36名受试者进行测量,并在两个不同的时间重复进行以检查可重复性。
在PLR期间,IVC直径没有显著变化,但SVC S波的峰值流速增加了6.5(95%置信区间1.6 - 11.3)cm/s(P = 0.01)。在LVO期间,呼气时IVC直径减小了3.2(1.7 - 4.7)mm,SVC S波减小了9.7(4.4 - 14.7)cm/s(P < 0.001)。腔静脉衍生指标可用于评估血容量正常时生理范围内的前负荷变化。
尽管基线测量的可重复性欠佳,但LVO后IVC直径变化和SVC血流变化之间的高度一致性表明,这些指标可用于监测心脏前负荷的变化。