• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析（新的）劳动力市场分化：欧洲局外人与全球化输家的社会经济风险

Disentangling (new) labour market divides: outsiders' and globalization losers' socio-economic risks in Europe.

作者信息

Natili Marcello, Negri Fedra

机构信息

Università Degli Studi Di Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Qual Quant. 2023;57(2):1561-1585. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01414-9. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11135-022-01414-9
PMID:35669164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9148940/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In post-industrial and globalized economies, socio-economic risks have become ubiquitous for workers. Two segments of the labour force seem particularly exposed: namely, outsiders (atypical workers and unemployed individuals) and globalization losers (unskilled workers in offshorable employment sectors), with relevant consequences for party competition in Europe. The coexistence of these two segments of vulnerable workers has brought conceptual ambiguity. Using the original 2019 REScEU Mass Survey on ten European countries, we firstly clarify that outsiders and globalization losers do not constitute the same socio-economic group. Secondly, we look into the micro-foundations of outsiders' and globalization losers' redistributive preferences and political behaviours by showing that outsiderness, rather than exposure to international competition, constitutes a significant driver of income and employment insecurities, and of dependency on social protection and family financial aid.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11135-022-01414-9.

摘要

未标注

在后工业化和全球化经济中，社会经济风险对工人来说已无处不在。劳动力中的两个群体似乎特别容易受到影响：即局外人（非典型工人和失业者）和全球化输家（可离岸外包就业部门的非技术工人），这对欧洲的政党竞争产生了相关影响。这两类弱势工人的共存带来了概念上的模糊性。利用2019年对十个欧洲国家进行的REScEU大规模原始调查，我们首先明确局外人与全球化输家并不构成同一个社会经济群体。其次，我们通过表明局外身份而非受国际竞争影响，是收入和就业不安全感以及对社会保护和家庭经济援助依赖的重要驱动因素，来探究局外人与全球化输家的再分配偏好和政治行为的微观基础。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11135-022-01414-9获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/a184567a61dc/11135_2022_1414_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/74ecaa8b2acd/11135_2022_1414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/036653ee1be3/11135_2022_1414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/71d9169d7926/11135_2022_1414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/9327eee042c3/11135_2022_1414_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/ddde536973bc/11135_2022_1414_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/a184567a61dc/11135_2022_1414_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/74ecaa8b2acd/11135_2022_1414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/036653ee1be3/11135_2022_1414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/71d9169d7926/11135_2022_1414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/9327eee042c3/11135_2022_1414_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/ddde536973bc/11135_2022_1414_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/9148940/a184567a61dc/11135_2022_1414_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disentangling (new) labour market divides: outsiders' and globalization losers' socio-economic risks in Europe.剖析（新的）劳动力市场分化：欧洲局外人与全球化输家的社会经济风险
Qual Quant. 2023;57(2):1561-1585. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01414-9. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
Neoliberalism, "globalization," unemployment, inequalities, and the welfare state.新自由主义、“全球化”、失业、不平等与福利国家。
Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(4):607-82. doi: 10.2190/Y3X7-RG7E-6626-FVPT.
3
Are pro-welfare state and full-employment policies possible in the era of globalization?在全球化时代，有利于福利国家和充分就业的政策是否可行？
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(2):231-51. doi: 10.2190/HXU0-A9D9-AC7C-3WY1.
4
Globalization and the marginalization of unskilled labor: potential impacts on health in developed nations.全球化与非技术劳动力的边缘化：对发达国家健康的潜在影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(1):45-57. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.1.b.
5
Labour market institutions and immigration policy attitudes: The moderated impact of economic vulnerability.劳动力市场制度与移民政策态度：经济脆弱性的调节作用
Nations Natl. 2022 Jul;28(3):1097-1116. doi: 10.1111/nana.12844. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
[Family policy in Western Europe: a sociological reflection].[西欧的家庭政策：社会学思考]
Annee Sociol. 1987(37):291-308.
7
Widening double dualisation? Labour market inequalities and national social policy responses in Western Europe during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.日益扩大的双重二元化？新冠疫情第一波期间西欧的劳动力市场不平等与国家社会政策应对措施
Soc Policy Adm. 2022 May 13. doi: 10.1111/spol.12814.
8
Welfare state, labour market inequalities and health. In a global context: an integrated framework. SESPAS report 2010.福利国家、劳动力市场不平等与健康。在全球背景下：一个综合框架。西班牙国家公共卫生与分析服务中心2010年报告
Gac Sanit. 2010 Dec;24 Suppl 1:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
9
Lost Generations: Long-Term Effects of the COVID-19 Crisis on Job Losers and Labour Market Entrants, and Options for Policy.失落的一代：新冠疫情危机对失业者和劳动力市场新进入者的长期影响及政策选择
Fisc Stud. 2020 Sep;41(3):549-590. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12247. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
10
Deepening the divide: Does globalization increase the polarization between winners and losers of globalization?加深分歧：全球化是否加剧了全球化赢家与输家之间的两极分化？
Br J Sociol. 2023 Dec;74(5):873-914. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13060. Epub 2023 Oct 22.