Ventura Christian Angelo I, Denton Edward E, David Jessica Anastacia, Schoenfelder Brianna J, Mela Lillian, Lumia Rebecca P, Rudi Rachel B, Haldar Barnita
Department of Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Health, Behavior and Society (Incoming), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 May 30;14:249-272. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S366006. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to analyze prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US through a brief systematic review of available literature in context with international prehospital counterparts. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of relevant keywords which returned n=5128 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=77) were reviewed and analyzed in accordance with PRISMA and PROSPERO recommendations. Methodical quality was assessed using critical appraisal tools, and the Egger's test was used for risk of bias reduction upon linear regression analysis of a funnel plot. Sources of heterogeneity as defined by P < 0.10 or I^2 > 50% were interrogated. Findings were considered within ten domains: structural/systemic; clinical outcomes; clinical assessment; treatment; special populations; dispatch/activation; education; mental health; perspectives/experiences; and transport. Findings suggest, EMS clinicians have likely made significant and unmeasured contributions to care during the pandemic via nontraditional roles, ie, COVID-19 testing and vaccine deployment. EMS plays a critical role in counteracting the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to the worsening opioid epidemic, both of which disproportionately impact patients of color. As such, being uniquely influential on clinical outcomes, these providers may benefit from standardized education on care and access disparities such as racial identity. Access to distance learning continuing education opportunities may increase rates of provider recertification. Additionally, there is a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among surveyed nationally registered EMS providers. Continued rigorous investigation on the impact of COVID-19 on EMS systems and personnel is warranted to ensure informed preparation for future pandemic and infectious disease responses.
本研究旨在通过简要系统回顾美国可用文献并与国际院前急救同行进行对比,分析美国院前急救服务(EMS)对新冠疫情的应对情况。使用相关关键词搜索字符串对NCBI数据库进行了探索,共返回n = 5128条结果;符合纳入标准的文章(n = 77)根据PRISMA和PROSPERO建议进行了审查和分析。使用批判性评估工具评估方法学质量,并在对漏斗图进行线性回归分析时使用Egger检验来降低偏倚风险。对P < 0.10或I^2 > 50%定义的异质性来源进行了探究。研究结果在十个领域进行了考量:结构/系统;临床结果;临床评估;治疗;特殊人群;调度/启动;教育;心理健康;观点/经验;以及转运。研究结果表明,在疫情期间,EMS临床医生可能通过非传统角色,即新冠病毒检测和疫苗接种,为护理做出了重大且难以衡量的贡献。除了日益严重的阿片类药物流行外,EMS在抗击新冠疫情中发挥着关键作用,这两者对有色人种患者的影响尤为严重。因此,这些提供者对临床结果具有独特的影响力,他们可能会从关于护理和获取差异(如种族身份)的标准化教育中受益。获得远程学习继续教育机会可能会提高提供者的重新认证率。此外,在全国范围内接受调查的注册EMS提供者中,疫苗犹豫的比例很高。有必要继续对新冠病毒对EMS系统和人员的影响进行严格调查,以确保为未来的疫情和传染病应对做好充分准备。