Suppr超能文献

自我转诊的急诊患者(SRW)与由紧急医疗服务送来的新冠肺炎患者的对比。

Self-Referred Walk-in (SRW) versus Emergency Medical Services Brought Covid-19 Patients.

作者信息

Kalani Navid, Hatami Naser, Ali Sajed, Mehramiz Neema John, Rahmanian Fatemeh, Raeyat Doost Esmaeil, Haghbeen Marzieh, Abiri Samaneh, Foroughian Mahdi, Ebrahimi Mohsen

机构信息

Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.

出版信息

Bull Emerg Trauma. 2022 Jan;10(1):21-26. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.92229.1299.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the characteristics of the emergency medical services (EMS) brought COVID-19 patients versus self-referred walk-in patients.

METHODS

This was a Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 infected cases in Jahrom, south of Iran. Age, sex, the symptoms of beginning days' passing, respiratory distress, PO2 at arrival, admission length and in-hospital death were retrieved for confirming COVID-19 cases in the whole 2020 year. Respiratory distress was considered as the sign that agitates the patient to call EMS care. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the possible difference of the hospitalization outcome in EMS brought or Self-referred walk-in (SRW) patients.

RESULTS

There was 704 (27.1%) registries patients transfer to the hospital by EMS and 1895 (72.9%) cases with SRW referred to the hospital. The survival distributions for the EMS group were statistically significant and lower than SRW group (<0.05). Despite the SRW patients, respiratory distress was associated with lower survival in EMS group (<0.05). Days passing the symptom's beginning was significantly different between EMS group (6.1±5.3 days) and SRW group (6.9±4.6 days). Cox regression showed higher mortality rate in patients higher than 75 years old in both groups (<0.05). Higher PO2 at arrival was associated with lower mortality rate of Hazard Ratio of 0.959 (<0.001) and 0.903 (<0.001) in EMS and SRW groups, respectively. The history of heart disease and hypertension were associated with 1.011 and 1.088 times more than mortality risk in EMS group; while cancer history was associated with 2.74 times more of mortality risk in SRW group.

CONCLUSION

It seems that severe acute respiratory syndrome occurs soon in some patients that lead to the need for an ambulance to transfer the patient to the hospital. Therefore, EMS transfer patients should be considered for more risk of severe COVID-19; considering comorbidities of heart disease and hypertension as red flags.

摘要

目的

比较新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)患者通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运与自行前来就诊患者的特征。

方法

这是一项对伊朗南部贾赫罗姆的COVID-19感染病例进行的横断面研究。收集了2020年全年确诊COVID-19病例的年龄、性别、发病初期症状、呼吸窘迫、到达时的动脉血氧分压(PO2)、住院时长和院内死亡情况。呼吸窘迫被视为促使患者呼叫EMS急救的症状。采用生存分析评估EMS转运患者与自行前来就诊(SRW)患者住院结局的可能差异。

结果

共有704例(27.1%)登记患者通过EMS转运至医院,1895例(72.9%)SRW患者前来医院就诊。EMS组的生存分布具有统计学意义,且低于SRW组(<0.05)。与SRW患者不同,呼吸窘迫与EMS组较低的生存率相关(<0.05)。EMS组(6.1±5.3天)和SRW组(6.9±4.6天)在症状出现后的天数存在显著差异。Cox回归显示,两组中75岁以上患者的死亡率较高(<0.05)。到达时较高的PO2与较低的死亡率相关,EMS组和SRW组的风险比分别为0.959(<0.001)和0.903(<0.001)。心脏病和高血压病史在EMS组中与死亡风险分别高出1.011倍和1.088倍;而癌症病史在SRW组中与死亡风险高出2.74倍相关。

结论

似乎某些患者很快就会出现严重急性呼吸综合征,导致需要救护车将患者转运至医院。因此,应考虑EMS转运患者感染严重COVID-19的风险更高;将心脏病和高血压合并症视为危险信号。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a89d/8818102/dc4c354fd135/bet-10-21-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验