Tong Xiangzhen, Zhang Zizhu, Zhu Jianping, Li Shuji, Qu Shaogang, Qin Bing, Guo Yanwu, Chen Rongqing
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Psychiatric Disorders, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 May 20;13:821917. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.821917. eCollection 2022.
Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency associated with acute severe systemic damage and high mortality. Moreover, symptomatic SE is one of the highest risk factors for epileptogenesis. While the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are chosen in favor of acute control of SE, the potential short-term and long-term effects of such AEDs have been ignored in clinics. In this study, we hypothesized that AEDs that are used to control acute SE might affect the feasibility for the chronic development of epileptogenesis after SE. Therefore, we sought to compare the epileptogenic effects of SE that are terminated by three AEDs, i.e., diazepam, midazolam, and pentobarbital, which are widely used as first-line anti-SE AEDs. For this purpose, we used a mouse model of SE induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of lithium chloride (LiCl)-pilocarpine. The pilocarpine-induced SE was terminated with diazepam, midazolam, or pentobarbital. Then we compared short-term and long-term effects of SE with different AED treatments by examining SE-associated mortality and behavioral spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRSs) and by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and immunohistochemistry to evaluate pathological and cellular alterations of mice in the different treatment groups. We found that i.p. injections of diazepam (5 mg/kg), midazolam (10 mg/kg), and pentobarbital (37.5 mg/kg) were able to terminate acute pilocarpine-SE effectively, while pentobarbital treatment showed less neuroprotective action against lethality in the short phase following SE. Long-term evaluation following SE revealed that SE treated with midazolam had resulted in relatively less behavioral SRS, less hippocampal atrophy, and milder neuronal loss and gliosis. Our data revealed an obvious advantage of midazolam vs. diazepam or pentobarbital in protecting the brain from epileptogenesis. Therefore, if midazolam provides as strong action to quench SE as other AEDs in clinics, midazolam should be the first choice of anti-SE AEDs as it provides additional benefits against epileptogenesis.
癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种与急性严重全身损害和高死亡率相关的医疗急症。此外,症状性SE是癫痫发生的最高风险因素之一。虽然选择抗癫痫药物(AEDs)来急性控制SE,但这些AEDs的潜在短期和长期影响在临床上一直被忽视。在本研究中,我们假设用于控制急性SE的AEDs可能会影响SE后癫痫发生慢性发展的可行性。因此,我们试图比较三种AEDs(即地西泮、咪达唑仑和戊巴比妥)终止SE后的致痫作用,这三种药物被广泛用作一线抗SE的AEDs。为此,我们使用了腹腔注射氯化锂(LiCl)-毛果芸香碱诱导的SE小鼠模型。用 地西泮、咪达唑仑或戊巴比妥终止毛果芸香碱诱导的SE。然后,我们通过检查与SE相关的死亡率和行为性自发复发性癫痫发作(SRSs),并使用磁共振成像(MRI)和免疫组织化学来评估不同治疗组小鼠的病理和细胞改变,比较了不同AED治疗对SE的短期和长期影响。我们发现腹腔注射地西泮(5mg/kg)、咪达唑仑(10mg/kg)和戊巴比妥(37.5mg/kg)能够有效终止急性毛果芸香碱诱导的SE,而戊巴比妥治疗在SE后的短时间内对致死率的神经保护作用较小。SE后的长期评估显示,用咪达唑仑治疗的SE导致相对较少的行为性SRS、较少的海马萎缩以及较轻的神经元丢失和胶质细胞增生。我们的数据揭示了咪达唑仑在地西泮或戊巴比妥保护大脑免受癫痫发生方面的明显优势。因此,如果咪达唑仑在临床上对终止SE的作用与其他AEDs一样强大,那么咪达唑仑应该是抗SE的AEDs的首选,因为它对癫痫发生有额外的益处。