Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间的宿命论、信念与行为

Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Akesson Jesper, Ashworth-Hayes Sam, Hahn Robert, Metcalfe Robert, Rasooly Itzhak

机构信息

The Behaviouralist, London, England.

University of Oxford and Technology Policy Institute, Oxford, England.

出版信息

J Risk Uncertain. 2022;64(2):147-190. doi: 10.1007/s11166-022-09375-y. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Abstract

Little is known about how people's beliefs concerning the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) influence their behavior. To shed light on this, we conduct an online experiment ( ) with US and UK residents. Participants are randomly allocated to a control group or to one of two treatment groups. The treatment groups are shown upper- or lower-bound expert estimates of the infectiousness of the virus. We present three main empirical findings. First, individuals dramatically overestimate the dangerousness and infectiousness of COVID-19 relative to expert opinion. Second, providing people with expert information partially corrects their beliefs about the virus. Third, the more infectious people believe that COVID-19 is, the less willing they are to take protective measures, a finding we dub the "fatalism effect". We develop a formal model that can explain the fatalism effect and discuss its implications for optimal policy during the pandemic.

摘要

人们对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的信念如何影响其行为,目前所知甚少。为了阐明这一点,我们对美国和英国居民进行了一项在线实验( )。参与者被随机分配到一个对照组或两个治疗组之一。治疗组会看到关于该病毒传染性的上限或下限专家估计值。我们呈现了三个主要实证发现。第一,相对于专家意见,个人显著高估了COVID-19的危险性和传染性。第二,向人们提供专家信息部分纠正了他们对该病毒的信念。第三,人们认为COVID-19传染性越强,他们采取保护措施的意愿就越低,我们将这一发现称为“宿命论效应”。我们建立了一个可以解释宿命论效应的正式模型,并讨论了其对疫情期间最优政策的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5b/9161200/45947b60f314/11166_2022_9375_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验