• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症患者的骨质疏松症管理和再次脆性骨折发生率:一项匹配队列研究。

Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2022 Sep;33(9):1999-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06451-6. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-022-06451-6
PMID:35670832
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study highlights the persistent osteoporosis treatment gap following fragility fractures. Patients with multiple sclerosis sustained more primary hip fractures than controls and exhibited significantly higher rates of falls within three years post-fracture. However, multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare rates of osteoporosis management, falls, and secondary fractures following primary fragility fractures among patients with MS versus matched controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients aged ≥ 50 years with primary fragility fractures were identified (n = 120,368). Within this population, patients with MS were matched 1:10 with controls across age, sex, and US region. Rates of osteoporosis diagnoses and pharmacologic treatment, low-energy falls, and secondary fragility fractures were compared at three years post-fracture via logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1,232 patients with MS (mean age, 65.7 years) with primary fragility fractures were matched with 12,320 controls (mean age, 65.8 years). Primary hip fractures were significantly more common in the MS cohort (47.4% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001). After the initial fracture, patients with MS were significantly more likely to receive a formal osteoporosis diagnosis (12.9% vs. 9.7%; OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.61) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (14.4% vs. 11.9%; OR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.46). The MS cohort also exhibited significantly higher rates of falls (27.8% vs 22.7%; OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32). Rates of secondary fractures were comparable (6.3% vs. 5.0%; OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.40).

CONCLUSION

Primary hip fragility fractures were significantly more common in patients with MS compared to matched controls. Following an initial fracture, patients with MS exhibited a significantly higher rate of falls but were more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较多发性硬化症 (MS) 患者与匹配对照者发生原发性脆性骨折后的骨质疏松管理、跌倒和继发性骨折的发生率。

材料和方法

使用 PearlDiver 数据库进行回顾性匹配队列研究。确定了年龄≥50 岁且患有原发性脆性骨折的患者(n=120368)。在该人群中,MS 患者按年龄、性别和美国地区与对照者 1:10 匹配。通过逻辑回归比较骨折后 3 年的骨质疏松诊断和药物治疗、低能量跌倒和继发性脆性骨折的发生率。

结果

共纳入 1232 例患有 MS(平均年龄 65.7 岁)且发生原发性脆性骨折的患者,与 12320 例对照者(平均年龄 65.8 岁)进行匹配。MS 队列中主要髋部骨折更为常见(47.4% vs. 34.2%,p<0.001)。初次骨折后,MS 患者更有可能接受正式的骨质疏松诊断(12.9% vs. 9.7%;比值比 [OR] 1.35;95%置信区间 [CI],1.13-1.61)和骨质疏松症药物治疗(14.4% vs. 11.9%;OR 1.24;95% CI,1.04-1.46)。MS 队列的跌倒发生率也显著更高(27.8% vs. 22.7%;OR 1.15;95% CI,1.01-1.32)。继发性骨折的发生率相当(6.3% vs. 5.0%;OR 1.10;95% CI,0.85-1.40)。

结论

与匹配对照者相比,MS 患者的原发性髋部脆性骨折明显更为常见。初次骨折后,MS 患者跌倒的发生率明显更高,但更有可能被诊断为骨质疏松症并接受药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.多发性硬化症患者的骨质疏松症管理和再次脆性骨折发生率:一项匹配队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Sep;33(9):1999-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06451-6. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
The Impact of Diabetes on Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Fracture Risk After Primary Fragility Fractures: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.糖尿病对原发性脆性骨折后骨质疏松症管理和二次骨折风险的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 15;30(2):e204-e212. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00185.
3
Fragility fracture care gap at a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级教学医院的脆性骨折护理差距。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 6;18(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01256-4.
4
Outcomes post fragility fracture among members of an integrated healthcare organization.脆性骨折患者在综合性医疗机构中的治疗结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Apr;33(4):783-790. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06205-w. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Declining trend in osteoporosis management and screening following vertebral compression fractures - a national analysis of commercial insurance and medicare advantage beneficiaries.骨质疏松症管理和筛查在椎体压缩性骨折后的下降趋势 - 商业保险和医疗保险优势受益人的全国分析。
Spine J. 2020 Apr;20(4):538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
6
Risk of osteoporotic fractures in multiple sclerosis patients in southwest Finland.芬兰西南部多发性硬化症患者骨质疏松性骨折的风险。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 May;135(5):516-521. doi: 10.1111/ane.12623. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009.美国 2000 年至 2009 年脆性骨折后骨质疏松症管理率下降。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):e52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.
8
Trends in anti-osteoporotic medication utilization following fragility fracture in the USA from 2011 to 2019.2011年至2019年美国脆性骨折后抗骨质疏松药物使用趋势
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Feb;34(2):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06622-5. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
9
Rates of Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Preventative Treatment After Primary Fragility Fractures.原发性脆性骨折后骨质疏松症的管理及二级预防性治疗率
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jun 14;6(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00142. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
10
Factors associated with non-initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy after hip fracture: analysis of claims data in Japan.与髋部骨折后骨质疏松症药物治疗起始相关的因素:来自日本索赔数据的分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Jul 21;18(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01314-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Brain-Gut-Bone Axis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Insights, Challenges, and Future Prospects.神经退行性疾病中的脑-肠-骨轴:见解、挑战与未来展望。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Oct;11(38):e2307971. doi: 10.1002/advs.202307971. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
The incremental risk of fragility fractures in aging men.老年男性脆性骨折的递增风险。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06956-8. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Effects of Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Nutritional Approaches on Body Composition and Bone Density in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes post fragility fracture among members of an integrated healthcare organization.脆性骨折患者在综合性医疗机构中的治疗结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Apr;33(4):783-790. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06205-w. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
2
Opioid Claims Prior to Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty and Risk of Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Claims.择期全关节置换术前阿片类药物的使用与术后长期阿片类药物使用索赔风险。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec 1;29(23):e1254-e1263. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01184.
3
Falls in People with Multiple Sclerosis: Risk Identification, Intervention, and Future Directions.
运动、康复和营养方法对多发性硬化症患者身体成分和骨密度的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Sep 8;8(3):132. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030132.
4
Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal association of bone mineral density and fracture with multiple sclerosis.骨密度和骨折与多发性硬化症因果关联的孟德尔随机化分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 15;13:993150. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.993150. eCollection 2022.
多发性硬化症患者的跌倒:风险识别、干预及未来方向
Int J MS Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(6):247-255. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2020-014. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Clinical characteristics of a large multi-center cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over age 60.60 岁以上多发性硬化症患者的大型多中心队列的临床特征。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jan;47:102637. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102637. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Real-world bone turnover marker use: impact on treatment decisions and fracture.真实世界中骨转换标志物的应用:对治疗决策和骨折的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 May;32(5):831-840. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05734-0. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Mortality after a proximal humeral fracture.肱骨近端骨折的死亡率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1484-1490. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0627.R1.
7
The use of 2-, 5-, and 10-year probabilities to characterize fracture risk after a recent sentinel fracture.利用 2 年、5 年和 10 年的概率来描述近期发生的哨兵骨折后的骨折风险。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jan;32(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05700-w. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials.作为降低骨折风险的替代生物标志物的骨密度治疗相关变化:来自多个随机对照试验的个体患者数据的荟萃回归分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Aug;8(8):672-682. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30159-5.
9
Implementation of a fracture liaison service and its effects on osteoporosis treatment adherence and secondary fracture at a tertiary care academic health system.骨折联络服务的实施及其对三级保健学术医疗系统中骨质疏松症治疗依从性和二次骨折的影响。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 May 28;15(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00736-1.
10
Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in US managed care enrollees.美国管理式医疗参保者骨质疏松性骨折的经济负担。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 May 1;26(5):e142-e149. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43156.