Suppr超能文献

马来西亚一家三级教学医院的脆性骨折护理差距。

Fragility fracture care gap at a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 6;18(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01256-4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Fracture begets fracture, pharmacological treatment is needed to prevent secondary fractures. This study found that there was a fragility fracture care gap where both bone health investigations and treatment initiation rates were low. Strategies such as Fracture Liaison Service is needed to address the care gap.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical burden and secondary fracture prevention of fragility fractures at a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of all patients admitted with fragility fractures between 1 January 2017-31 December 2018 were reviewed. Patients < 50 years old, with non-fragility fractures, restricted access to medical records, transferred to another hospital or who passed away during admission were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise patients' characteristics, frequency of fragility fractures, and secondary fracture prevention details. Binomial logistic regression was performed to analyse predictive factors for post-fracture bone health assessments and treatment initiation.

RESULTS

1030 patients [female (767/1030, 74.5%)] presented with 1071 fractures [hip fractures (378/1071, 35.3%)]. 170/993 (17.1%) patients were initiated on anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) and 148/984 (15.0%) had bone mineral density (BMD) performed within 1-year post-fracture. Less than half (42.4%) of the patients remained on treatment at 1-year post-fracture. Older patients [65-74 years old: odds ratio (OR) = 2.18, 95%CI 1.05-4.52, p = 0.04; ≥ 75 years: OR = 3.06, 95%CI 1.54-6.07, p < 0.01], hip fractures (OR = 1.95, 95%CI 1.23-3.11, p < 0.01), Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.07-3.35, p = 0.03),previously diagnosed with osteoporosis (OR = 2.65, 95%CI:1.32-5.31, p < 0.01) and a BMD test performed (OR = 12.48, 95%CI 8.04-19.37, p < 0.01) were found to have higher AOM initiation. Patients with past diagnosis of osteoporosis (OR = 4.45, 95%CI 2.25-8.81, p < 0.01) and initiated on AOM (OR = 11.34, 95%CI 7.57-16.97, p < 0.01) had a higher likelihood to undergo BMD testing.

CONCLUSION

The AOM initiation and BMD testing rates were low. There is a need to address the fragility fracture care gap with strategies such as Fracture Liaison Service.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查马来西亚一家教学医院脆性骨折的临床负担和继发性骨折预防情况。

方法

对 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因脆性骨折入院的所有患者的电子病历进行回顾性分析。排除年龄<50 岁、非脆性骨折、病历获取受限、转院或住院期间死亡的患者。采用描述性统计方法总结患者的特征、脆性骨折发生频率和继发性骨折预防的详细信息。采用二项逻辑回归分析骨折后骨健康评估和治疗启动的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 1030 例患者(女性 767/1030,74.5%),共发生 1071 处骨折(髋部骨折 378/1071,35.3%)。993 例患者中有 170 例(17.1%)开始使用抗骨质疏松药物(AOM),984 例患者中有 148 例(15.0%)在骨折后 1 年内进行了骨密度检查。骨折后 1 年,仅有不到一半(42.4%)的患者仍在接受治疗。年龄较大的患者(65-74 岁:比值比[OR] = 2.18,95%CI 1.05-4.52,p = 0.04;≥75 岁:OR = 3.06,95%CI 1.54-6.07,p < 0.01)、髋部骨折(OR = 1.95,95%CI 1.23-3.11,p < 0.01)、华裔(OR = 1.90,95%CI 1.07-3.35,p = 0.03)、既往骨质疏松症诊断(OR = 2.65,95%CI:1.32-5.31,p < 0.01)和骨密度检查(OR = 12.48,95%CI 8.04-19.37,p < 0.01)与 AOM 启动率更高有关。既往骨质疏松症诊断(OR = 4.45,95%CI 2.25-8.81,p < 0.01)和 AOM 治疗启动(OR = 11.34,95%CI 7.57-16.97,p < 0.01)的患者更有可能进行骨密度检查。

结论

AOM 起始率和 BMD 检测率均较低。需要采用骨折联络服务等策略来解决脆性骨折治疗的差距问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验