Suppr超能文献

后路脊柱内固定术后手术部位感染的当前管理趋势:系统评价。

Current Management Trends for Surgical Site Infection After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Instrumentation: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.138. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to determine the fate of spinal implants when patients develop postoperative wound infection after posterior instrumental fusion in a degenerative spine.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English-language literature (published between January 2001 and July 2020) was undertaken to identify articles documenting the management strategy for surgical site infections (SSIs) after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Studies on pedicle screw fixation after trauma, immunocompromised, metastatic spine disease, and combined anterior/posterior approach were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the criteria set by the North American Spine Society, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Of the 3071 citations identified, 49 met the criteria to undergo full-text review. Outcomes after SSIs were studied from a combined pool of 1150 patients who had undergone instrumental spinal fusion. The collected data showed that 456 patients (39.97%) had undergone spinal implant removal after SSI while 694 patients (60.03%) had their implants retained until the resolution of SSI. There was an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 29% (-0.292) and a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 50.3% (-0.503) of implant removal if the patient underwent wound debridement following SSI. The number needed to treat (NNT) for wound debridement was calculated at 3.31 from our pooled cohort. The ARR in implant removal following vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy was 16.6% and RRR was noted at 40.4%. This led to a high value of NNT at 6.0 patients. There was an ARR of 33.5% and a RRR of 70.7% was estimated in patients undergoing continuous irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review of the literature suggests that surgeons prefer early wound debridement with or without negative pressure wound therapy under antimicrobial coverage for eradication of SSI after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Implant removal is generally reserved for cases refractory to the other treatment modalities.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定在退行性脊柱后路器械融合术后发生术后伤口感染的患者中,脊柱植入物的结局。

方法

对 2001 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月发表的英文文献进行系统评价,以确定记录后路腰椎融合术后手术部位感染(SSI)管理策略的文章。排除创伤后、免疫功能低下、转移性脊柱疾病和前路/后路联合入路的椎弓根螺钉固定研究。两名独立评审员使用北美脊柱协会制定的标准评估证据质量水平,分歧通过共识解决。

结果

在 3071 条引文中,有 49 条符合进行全文审查的标准。对发生 SSI 的 1150 例患者的综合资料进行了 SSI 后结局研究。收集的数据显示,456 例(39.97%)患者在发生 SSI 后行脊柱植入物取出,694 例(60.03%)患者保留植入物直至 SSI 得到解决。如果患者在 SSI 后进行伤口清创,脊柱植入物取出的绝对风险降低(ARR)为 29%(-0.292),相对风险降低(RRR)为 50.3%(-0.503)。对我们的汇总队列进行计算,伤口清创的治疗指数(NNT)为 3.31。真空辅助闭合(VAC)治疗后植入物取出的 ARR 为 16.6%,RRR 为 40.4%。这导致 NNT 值高为 6.0 例。持续冲洗患者的 ARR 为 33.5%,RRR 为 70.7%。

结论

我们对文献的回顾表明,外科医生在进行后路腰椎融合术后,一般倾向于早期进行伤口清创,同时或不进行负压伤口治疗,并在抗菌覆盖下,以消除 SSI。一般情况下,只有在其他治疗方法无效的情况下才会选择取出植入物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验