• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《自我调节评估(SeRA)问卷:一种新的康复患者报告结局测量工具的开发和探索性分析》

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

机构信息

Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(12):2038-2045. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080289. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2022.2080289
PMID:35672153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10243404/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and explore underlying dimensions of the Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) and psychometric features of potential components. Further, to identify associations between the SeRA and disability-management self-efficacy, type of diagnosis, and type of rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a previously developed model of self-regulation, expert and patient opinions, and cognitive interviews, a list of 22 items on self-regulation (the SeRA) was constructed. The SeRA was included in a cross-sectional survey among a multi-diagnostic group of 563 former rehabilitation patients. Exploratory analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Respondents had a mean age of 56.5 ( 12.7) years. The largest diagnostic groups were chronic pain disorder and brain injury. Four components were found within the SeRA, labelled as "insight into own health condition," "insight into own capabilities," "apply self-regulation," and "organization of help." Cronbach's alpha was high (total scale: 0.93, subscales: range 0.85-0.89). Only scores on the first subscale showed a ceiling effect. Subscale three showed the highest correlation with a self-efficacy measure. Small differences in SeRA total scores (range 71.6-78.1) were found between different diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSION

The SeRA is a new self-regulation measure with four subscales. Further research is needed to establish the validity and reliability of the SeRA. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) was developed to provide a comprehensive measurement of self-regulation among rehabilitation populations.The SeRA could potentially be used to identify persons with self-regulation problems at the start of rehabilitation treatment and measure outcomes of rehabilitation for self-regulation.The SeRA could potentially be used to help analyse outcomes of rehabilitation practice as well as evaluate interventions on self-regulation.

摘要

目的

开发和探索自我调节评估(SeRA)的潜在维度和潜在组成部分的心理测量特征。此外,确定 SeRA 与残疾管理自我效能、诊断类型和康复类型之间的关联。

材料和方法

基于先前开发的自我调节模型、专家和患者意见以及认知访谈,构建了一个关于自我调节的 22 项清单(SeRA)。SeRA 被纳入了一项对 563 名前康复患者的多诊断组的横断面调查中。进行了探索性分析。

结果

受访者的平均年龄为 56.5(12.7)岁。最大的诊断组是慢性疼痛障碍和脑损伤。在 SeRA 中发现了四个组成部分,分别标记为“对自身健康状况的洞察”、“对自身能力的洞察”、“应用自我调节”和“帮助组织”。克朗巴赫的阿尔法值很高(总量表:0.93,子量表:范围 0.85-0.89)。只有第一个子量表的分数显示出上限效应。子量表三与自我效能测量的相关性最高。在不同的诊断组之间,SeRA 总分(范围 71.6-78.1)存在微小差异。

结论

SeRA 是一种新的自我调节测量工具,有四个子量表。需要进一步研究来建立 SeRA 的有效性和可靠性。

对康复的影响

  • SeRA 是一种新的自我调节测量工具,有四个子量表。需要进一步研究来建立 SeRA 的有效性和可靠性。

  • SeRA 可以用来在康复治疗开始时识别自我调节问题的人,并测量康复治疗的自我调节结果。

  • SeRA 可以用来帮助分析康复实践的结果,以及评估自我调节干预措施。

相似文献

1
The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.《自我调节评估(SeRA)问卷:一种新的康复患者报告结局测量工具的开发和探索性分析》
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(12):2038-2045. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080289. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Using Self-Regulation Assessment to Explore Associations between Self-Regulation, Participation and Health-Related Quality of Life in a Rehabilitation Population.运用自我调节评估探索康复人群中自我调节、参与度与健康相关生活质量之间的关联。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb 7;55:jrm00369. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2531.
3
Assessing self-reported disability in a low-literate population with chronic low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of Igbo Roland Morris disability questionnaire.在低文化背景的慢性腰痛人群中评估自我报告的残疾:伊博 Roland Morris 残疾问卷的跨文化适应和心理测量学测试。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(8):948-957. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416185. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
5
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the severity of pain, functional limitations, and reduction of sports ability for german-speaking patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle (OCLA-G).开发并验证了一份问卷,用于测量德语国家踝关节骨软骨损伤(OCLA-G)患者的疼痛严重程度、功能受限和运动能力下降。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 1;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06445-3.
6
Validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument of health-related quality of life specific to patients with alcohol use disorder: the Alcohol Quality of Life Scale (AQoLS).一种针对酒精使用障碍患者的新的患者报告的健康相关生活质量结局工具的验证:酒精生活质量量表(AQoLS)。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1549-60. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1190-5. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
8
The PQRS-Montreal: a measure of patients' perceptions of the quality of rehabilitation services for persons with a traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者康复服务质量感知量表 - 蒙特利尔版
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan;39(1):59-72. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1140828. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Validation and reliability testing of the Breast-Q latissimus dorsi questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties in a Swedish population.验证和可靠性测试的乳房-Q 背阔肌问卷:跨文化适应和心理测量特性在瑞典人群。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 3;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01812-x.
10
A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.一种用于电子评估和治疗监测的模块化健康相关生活质量工具:基于网络的核心Thrive项目开发及心理测量学验证
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e12075. doi: 10.2196/12075.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Self-Regulation Assessment to Explore Associations between Self-Regulation, Participation and Health-Related Quality of Life in a Rehabilitation Population.运用自我调节评估探索康复人群中自我调节、参与度与健康相关生活质量之间的关联。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb 7;55:jrm00369. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2531.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the self-regulation assessment and content validation using cognitive interviews in a multicultural post-rehabilitation population.在多元文化康复后人群中使用认知访谈进行自我调节评估和内容验证的开发
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 19;4:1085658. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1085658. eCollection 2023.
2
Measures of self-regulation used in adult rehabilitation populations: A systematic review and content screening.成人康复人群中使用的自我调节措施:系统评价和内容筛选。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Aug;36(8):1120-1138. doi: 10.1177/02692155221091510. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Self-regulation as rehabilitation outcome: what is important according to former patients?自我调节作为康复结果:根据前患者的观点,什么是重要的?
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7484-7490. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1998663. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life.仅仅独立就足够了吗?康复治疗应该包括自主性和社会参与,以实现生活质量。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jan;35(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/0269215520954344. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Factors Associated With Participation in Life Situations for Adults With Stroke: A Systematic Review.与脑卒中成人参与生活情境相关的因素:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):945-955. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Rasch analysis of the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale short-form (UW-SES-6) in people with long-standing spinal cord injury.华盛顿大学自我效能量表简版(UW-SES-6)在长期脊髓损伤患者中的拉施分析。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Nov;56(11):1095-1101. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0166-z. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
Uses of self-regulation to facilitate and restrain addictive behavior.运用自我调节来促进和抑制成瘾行为。
Addict Behav. 2015 May;44:3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
University of Washington self-efficacy scale: a new self-efficacy scale for people with disabilities.华盛顿大学自我效能感量表:适用于残疾人群的新型自我效能感量表。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;93(10):1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 7.
9
Determinants of physical activity among people with spinal cord injury: a test of social cognitive theory.脊髓损伤患者身体活动的决定因素:社会认知理论的检验。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9278-9.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the index of self-regulation.
West J Nurs Res. 2011 Mar;33(2):268-85. doi: 10.1177/0193945910378854. Epub 2010 Aug 17.