• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦医疗保健质量计划:通过使用质量改进合作来实现变革。

The Danish health care quality programme: Creating change through the use of quality improvement collaboratives.

机构信息

DEFACTUM, Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Alle 15, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark.

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2022 Aug;126(8):749-754. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.019
PMID:35672172
Abstract

Policy-makers worldwide place quality in health care high on their agendas. Inspired by global trends within health care governance, there has been an increase in patient-oriented and network-based models for quality improvement. In 2015, the Danish Government introduced the Danish Health Care Quality Programme (DHCQP) for the entire Danish health care system in line with this development. For the first time in Denmark, the DHCQP introduced network-based quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) as a model for the implementation of a national quality improvement reform. This article presents the organisational set up and anticipated effects of using QICs within the DHCQP. The Danish set-up is related to the common international use of QICs and the existing evidence for their effectiveness and implementation. The analysis demonstrates a novel organisational set-up embedded in the organisation of the QICs. Furthermore, the article points to two main trends in the DHCQP, namely, centralisation of quality improvement strategies and integration of quality improvement work in clinical practices, and furthermore proposes a need for future research concerning implementation of QICs. Particularly, there is a need to investigate the different activities and organisational mechanisms in the implementation process and how these influence the implementation and functioning of QICs.

摘要

政策制定者在全球范围内将医疗保健质量置于其议程的重要位置。受全球医疗保健治理趋势的启发,出现了以患者为导向和基于网络的质量改进模式。2015 年,丹麦政府顺应这一发展,为整个丹麦医疗保健系统推出了丹麦医疗保健质量计划(DHCQP)。这是丹麦首次引入基于网络的质量改进合作组织(QIC),作为实施国家质量改进改革的模式。本文介绍了在 DHCQP 中使用 QIC 的组织设置和预期效果。丹麦的设置与 QIC 的常见国际用途以及现有证据证明其有效性和实施情况有关。分析表明,在 QIC 的组织中嵌入了一种新颖的组织设置。此外,本文还指出了 DHCQP 中的两个主要趋势,即质量改进策略的集中化和质量改进工作在临床实践中的整合,并进一步提出了对 QIC 实施情况进行未来研究的必要性。特别是,需要研究实施过程中的不同活动和组织机制,以及这些活动和机制如何影响 QIC 的实施和运作。

相似文献

1
The Danish health care quality programme: Creating change through the use of quality improvement collaboratives.丹麦医疗保健质量计划:通过使用质量改进合作来实现变革。
Health Policy. 2022 Aug;126(8):749-754. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Implementation through translation: a qualitative case study of translation processes in the implementation of quality improvement collaboratives.实施途径的翻译:一项关于质量改进合作实施中翻译过程的定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09201-4.
3
Engaging health care professionals in quality improvement: A qualitative study exploring the synergies between projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation in quality improvement collaborative implementation in Denmark.使医疗保健专业人员参与质量改进:一项定性研究,探讨了丹麦质量改进合作实施中专业化和制度化项目之间的协同作用。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Jul;29(3):163-172. doi: 10.1177/13558196241231169. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation.如何通过质量改进合作来改善养老院的医疗保健:一个实际评估。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1371-1381. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab007.
5
Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.理解质量改进协作的组成部分:系统文献回顾。
Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):354-94. doi: 10.1111/milq.12016.
6
The effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in improving stroke care and the facilitators and barriers to their implementation: a systematic review.质量改进合作在改善卒中护理方面的效果及其实施的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 3;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01162-8.
7
Effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in UK surgical settings and barriers and facilitators influencing their implementation: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.英国外科环境中质量改进合作的有效性及其实施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和证据综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002241.
8
In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data-possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time.基于注册数据对来自不同医疗保健领域的两个质量改进合作组织进行深入比较——可能有助于在项目时间之外持续改善结果的因素。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jul 23;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0926-y.
9
How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.质量改进合作如何以及在什么情况下能带来更好的结果?系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 4;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z.
10
Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study.创建有效的质量改进合作组织:一项多案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):344-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047159. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Between Scylla and Charybdis?-Health insurance claims-data to monitor quality of service delivery in ophthalmology.在斯库拉和卡律布狄斯之间?——利用健康保险理赔数据监测眼科服务质量
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3412-3415. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03333-5. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Distributed leadership in health quality improvement collaboratives.卫生质量改进合作中的分布式领导。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2024;49(1):46-58. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000385. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
3
Implementation through translation: a qualitative case study of translation processes in the implementation of quality improvement collaboratives.
实施途径的翻译:一项关于质量改进合作实施中翻译过程的定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09201-4.