• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐单部位两切口腹腔镜幽门肌切开术治疗小儿肥厚性幽门狭窄。

Transumbilical single-site two incision laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. #37 Guo-Xue-Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Day Surgery Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01672-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01672-2
PMID:35672844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9172057/
Abstract

PURPOSE

A new novel technique for the treatment of pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS), transumbilical single-site laparoscopic pyloromyotomy with a single instrument (TUSSLP), was introduced. TUSSLP was compared with the transabdominal three-site laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (TATSLP) procedure.

METHODS

Patients with HPS who underwent TUSSLP and TATSLP between January 2016 and September 2020 were assigned to group A and group B, respectively. The descriptive variables, perioperative clinical characteristics and postoperative follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of switching to conventional pyloromyotomy.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 29 (22 males, 7 females, 54.4 ± 22.6 days) who received TUSSLP were assigned to group A. The remaining 35 (28 males, 7 females, 54.5 ± 27.6 days) who received TATSLP were assigned to group B. The data of preoperative patient variables were comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The mean operative time (ORT) was 28.1 ± 5.6 min in group A, which was not significantly different from 25.8 ± 3.1 min in group B (P = 0.25). The other perioperative features were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). During follow-up (39.1 ± 14.7 m in group A and 35.4 ± 16.1 m in group B, P = 0.51), no significant difference was observed in the overall incidence of vomiting between the 2 groups (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

TUSSLP is a feasible and reliable minimally invasive method for HPS. It has the advantages of an improved cosmetic appearance. The postoperative follow-up results of TUSSLP are comparable with those of TATSLP.

摘要

目的

介绍一种治疗小儿肥厚性幽门狭窄(HPS)的新的微创技术,即经脐单部位腹腔镜幽门肌切开术(TUSSLP)联合单器械。TUSSLP 与经腹三部位腹腔镜幽门肌切开术(TATSLP)进行比较。

方法

将 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间接受 TUSSLP 和 TATSLP 的 HPS 患者分别纳入 A 组和 B 组。回顾性分析比较两组患者的描述性变量、围手术期临床特征和术后随访结果。本研究的主要转归为转换为传统幽门肌切开术的发生率。

结果

本研究共纳入 64 例患者,其中 29 例(22 例男性,7 例女性,54.4±22.6 天)接受 TUSSLP 治疗的患者被纳入 A 组,其余 35 例(28 例男性,7 例女性,54.5±27.6 天)接受 TATSLP 治疗的患者被纳入 B 组。两组患者术前患者变量数据具有可比性(P>0.05)。A 组的平均手术时间(ORT)为 28.1±5.6 分钟,与 B 组的 25.8±3.1 分钟无显著差异(P=0.25)。两组的其他围手术期特征无显著差异(P>0.05)。在随访期间(A 组 39.1±14.7 个月,B 组 35.4±16.1 个月,P=0.51),两组的总体呕吐发生率无显著差异(P=0.26)。

结论

TUSSLP 是治疗 HPS 的一种可行且可靠的微创方法,具有改善美容外观的优点。TUSSLP 的术后随访结果与 TATSLP 相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/f984a31ca736/12893_2022_1672_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/d59fa5cdaa1f/12893_2022_1672_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/0713991d2e05/12893_2022_1672_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/f984a31ca736/12893_2022_1672_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/d59fa5cdaa1f/12893_2022_1672_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/0713991d2e05/12893_2022_1672_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ed/9172057/f984a31ca736/12893_2022_1672_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Transumbilical single-site two incision laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.经脐单部位两切口腹腔镜幽门肌切开术治疗小儿肥厚性幽门狭窄。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01672-2.
2
Single-Site Umbilical Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy Using a Pyloric Electrocoagulation Chisel Combined with a Left-Handed Main Operation for Congenital Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.单部位脐部腹腔镜下幽门肌切开术:使用幽门电凝凿结合左手主操作治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1248-1252. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0478. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a survey of 407 children.腹腔镜下幽门肌切开术治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄:407例儿童的调查
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Apr;34(4):421-426. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4235-3. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜幽门肌切开术治疗小儿肥厚性幽门狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 8;38(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04402-z.
5
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Our experience with twenty cases.腹腔镜幽门肌切开术治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄:我们的 20 例经验。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;18(1):14-17. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_119_20.
6
The First Application of Intraumbilical Longitudinal Incision to Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.经脐部纵行切口行幽门肌切开术治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄的首次应用。
Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;48(2):67-71.
7
Postoperative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.开放性与腹腔镜下幽门肌切开术治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄的术后结果
J Surg Res. 2018 Apr;224:240-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.040. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Top to Bottom: A New Method for Assessing Adequacy of Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy.自上而下:一种评估腹腔镜幽门肌切开术充分性的新方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):934-937. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0303. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy.单切口儿科内镜幽门肌切开术的交叉技术。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3414-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1677-2. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
10
Laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertropic pyloric stenosis: an early experience.腹腔镜与开放幽门肌切开术治疗婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄:早期经验
Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jul;21(3):430-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Transumbilical single-site laparoscopic treatment of primary splenic cyst in child: a rare case report and review of literature.经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗儿童原发性脾囊肿:1例罕见病例报告并文献复习
Front Pediatr. 2024 Sep 25;12:1454487. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1454487. eCollection 2024.
2
Transumbilical single-site laparoscopic treatment of small intestinal cavernous hemangioma in child: a case report.经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗小儿小肠海绵状血管瘤1例报告
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 29;14:1360557. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1360557. eCollection 2024.
3
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开放性与腹腔镜下幽门肌切开术治疗幽门狭窄的系统评价与Meta分析
J Surg Res. 2022 Jun;274:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.042. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
The Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy Using 3-mm Electrocautery Hook versus Open Surgery for Treatment of Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis in Infants.使用3毫米电灼钩的腹腔镜幽门肌切开术与开放手术治疗婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄的安全性和有效性。
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;8(8):701. doi: 10.3390/children8080701.
3
Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: 10 Years' Experience with Standard Open and Laparoscopic Approach.
单切口与传统腹腔镜幽门肌切开术治疗小儿肥厚性幽门狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 8;38(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04402-z.
肥厚性幽门狭窄:标准开放手术和腹腔镜手术10年经验
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2021 May;24(3):265-272. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.3.265. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Getting it right first time: implementation of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy without a learning curve.首次即正确:无学习曲线的腹腔镜幽门肌切开术的实施。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Feb;103(2):130-133. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7014.
5
Our Experience with Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Patients with Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.我们对婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄患者进行腹腔镜幽门肌切开术的经验。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020 Sep 3;54(3):333-336. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.16779. eCollection 2020.
6
Laparoscopic vs. Open Pyloromyotomy in Treatment of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.腹腔镜与开放幽门肌切开术治疗婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄的对比
Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 21;8:426. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00426. eCollection 2020.
7
Single-Site Umbilical Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy Using a Pyloric Electrocoagulation Chisel Combined with a Left-Handed Main Operation for Congenital Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.单部位脐部腹腔镜下幽门肌切开术:使用幽门电凝凿结合左手主操作治疗先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1248-1252. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0478. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
The Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Congenital Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis in Infants.腹腔镜与开放性手术治疗婴儿先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄的安全性和有效性。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 May 14;26:e921555. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921555.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy: Concerns for omental herniation at port sites after the laparoscopic approach.腹腔镜与开腹幽门肌切开术的比较:腹腔镜入路后端口部位发生网膜疝的担忧。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57031-4.
10
Late-Onset Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis in a 14-Weeks-Old Full Term Male Infant.一名14周龄足月男婴的迟发性肥厚性幽门狭窄
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2019;62(2):82-84. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2019.108.