Department of Biomedical Informatics and Management, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:168-172. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220054.
Electronic health records should efficiently store the information required for clinical decision-making and contain progress notes that reference this information. However, beyond the inclusion of subjective data, objective data, assessment, and plan framework, the content required to make progress notes useful for readers with diverse specialties has not been clarified. Moreover, the documentation burden that including additional content places on medical doctors (MDs) has not been determined. We conducted a questionnaire with 74 MDs, nurses, and other clinical professionals to determine whether they found progress notes with varying specific contents useful. In addition, the degree of the burden of writing progress notes that contain specific content was measured when 25 MDs were instructed to add specific content. Our results reveal that progress notes are more useful for clinical reasoning for readers other than MDs when more specific information is included; this can be achieved without increasing the documentation burden.
电子健康记录应当高效地存储临床决策所需的信息,并包含引用这些信息的进展记录。然而,除了包含主观数据、客观数据、评估和计划框架之外,对于具有不同专业背景的读者来说,使进展记录变得有用所需的内容还没有得到明确。此外,包含其他内容会给医生带来多大的文档撰写负担也尚未确定。我们对 74 名医生、护士和其他临床专业人员进行了问卷调查,以确定他们是否认为具有不同具体内容的进展记录有用。此外,当 25 名医生被要求添加特定内容时,我们还测量了包含特定内容的进展记录的书写负担程度。研究结果表明,当包含更具体的信息时,进展记录对于非医生的临床推理更有用;而且这并不会增加文档撰写负担。