Ruggles Steven, Magnuson Diana L
Regents Professor of History and Population Studies and Director of the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (ipums), University of Minnesota.
Professor of History, Bethel University, and Director of Archives, History Center of Bethel University and Converge.
J Interdiscip Hist. 2020 Winter;50(3):363-382. doi: 10.1162/jinh_a_01446.
The use of quantitative methods in leading historical journals increased dramatically in the 1960s and declined sharply after the mid-1980s. The is an invaluable source for analysis of the boom and bust in the use of quantitative methods in history; the journal remained under the same editors for almost fifty years and made no attempt to change editorial policies during that period. Shifting patterns of content and authorship in the from the 1980s to the early 2000s reveal how the journal responded to a dramatic decline in quantitative submissions by U.S.-based historians. Recent years have seen a revival of quantification both in the and in mainstream historical journals, especially among historians located at institutions outside the United States.
20世纪60年代,主要历史期刊中定量方法的使用急剧增加,而在20世纪80年代中期之后则急剧下降。该期刊是分析历史研究中定量方法兴衰的宝贵资料来源;该期刊在近五十年的时间里由同一批编辑负责,在此期间并未试图改变编辑政策。从20世纪80年代到21世纪初该期刊内容和作者构成的变化模式,揭示了该期刊如何应对美国历史学家定量研究投稿的急剧减少。近年来,无论是该期刊还是主流历史期刊中,定量研究都出现了复兴,尤其是在美国以外机构的历史学家中。