• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释基于教育程度在对新冠疫情信息进行系统性处理方面的差异:对从信息疫情中实现全球复苏的见解。

Explaining education-based difference in systematic processing of COVID-19 information: Insights into global recovery from infodemic.

作者信息

Huang Qing, Wei Lu

机构信息

College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Inf Process Manag. 2022 Jul;59(4):102989. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102989. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102989
PMID:35673633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9156961/
Abstract

Systematic processing helps individuals identify misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and serves as an individual-level measure to fight the infodemic. Highly educated people tend to engage in systematic processing more than their less educated counterparts. We follow a major part of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model to explicate this gap. An online survey ( = 1,568) conducted during the early stage of the pandemic in China showed that current knowledge and perceived information gathering capacity both positively mediated the association between education level and systematic processing. Although informational subjective norms were positively associated with systematic processing, we did not observe a significant difference in these norms between highly and less educated individuals. The results clarify the psychological mechanism underlying the education-based difference in systematic processing of the COVID-19 information and corroborate a relevant part of the RISP model. Moreover, our findings offer practical implications for facilitating individuals with less educational attainment to engage in systematic processing, thereby alleviating the negative impact of exposure to misinformation on them. These insights not only apply to managing the infodemic in China, but also inform the global recovery from the infodemic.

摘要

系统加工有助于个体在新冠疫情期间识别错误信息,并作为应对信息疫情的个体层面措施。受教育程度高的人往往比受教育程度低的人更倾向于进行系统加工。我们遵循风险信息寻求与加工(RISP)模型的主要部分来解释这一差距。在中国疫情早期进行的一项在线调查(n = 1568)显示,当前知识和感知信息收集能力均正向调节了教育水平与系统加工之间的关联。尽管信息主观规范与系统加工呈正相关,但我们并未观察到受教育程度高和低的个体在这些规范上存在显著差异。研究结果阐明了新冠疫情信息系统加工中基于教育的差异背后的心理机制,并证实了RISP模型的相关部分。此外,我们的研究结果为促进受教育程度较低的个体进行系统加工提供了实际意义,从而减轻接触错误信息对他们的负面影响。这些见解不仅适用于中国的信息疫情管理,也为全球从信息疫情中恢复提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/3cbd181e2f21/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/a792509128a1/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/8d1a68bdb4bd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/3cbd181e2f21/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/a792509128a1/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/8d1a68bdb4bd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fe/9156961/3cbd181e2f21/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Explaining education-based difference in systematic processing of COVID-19 information: Insights into global recovery from infodemic.解释基于教育程度在对新冠疫情信息进行系统性处理方面的差异:对从信息疫情中实现全球复苏的见解。
Inf Process Manag. 2022 Jul;59(4):102989. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102989. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
3
Information Seeking and Processing during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Taiwan: Examining the Effects of Emotions and Informational Subjective Norms.COVID-19 疫情期间台湾的信息寻求和处理:检验情绪和信息主观规范的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159532.
4
Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic.40 多个国家的错误信息、可信度与疫苗接种:新冠疫情信息流初始阶段的重要发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263381. eCollection 2022.
5
Stratified Impacts of the Infodemic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey in 6 Asian Jurisdictions.分层影响的信息疫情在 COVID-19 大流行期间:横断面调查在 6 个亚洲司法管辖区。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 22;24(3):e31088. doi: 10.2196/31088.
6
Information seeking during the COVID-19 pandemic: Application of the risk information seeking and processing model.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的信息寻求:风险信息寻求和处理模型的应用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jun;19(6):956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Public Emotional and Coping Responses to the COVID-19 Infodemic: A Review and Recommendations.公众对新冠疫情信息疫情的情绪及应对反应:综述与建议
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 14;12:755938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.755938. eCollection 2021.
8
Infodemic vs. Pandemic Factors Associated to Public Anxiety in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.新冠疫情早期公众焦虑的信息疫情与大流行因素关联:中国的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;9:723648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.723648. eCollection 2021.
9
Infodemic, Institutional Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-National Survey.信息疫情、机构信任与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项跨国调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138033.
10
"I enjoy thinking critically, and I'm in control": Examining the influences of media literacy factors on misperceptions amidst the COVID-19 infodemic.“我喜欢批判性思考,而且我能掌控局面”:审视媒体素养因素对新冠疫情信息疫情期间错误认知的影响。
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107111. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107111. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Price Fairness, Consumer Attitude, and Loyalty in the U.S. Egg Market: The Moderating Roles of Tariff Concern and Education Level.美国鸡蛋市场中的价格公平性、消费者态度与忠诚度:关税关注和教育水平的调节作用
Foods. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):2243. doi: 10.3390/foods14132243.
2
The effectiveness of a health education intervention to reduce anxiety in quarantined COVID-19 patients: a randomized controlled trial.健康教育干预对减轻 COVID-19 隔离患者焦虑的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):1188. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16104-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of COVID-19 Misinformation on Information Seeking, Avoidance, and Processing: A Multicountry Comparative Study.新冠疫情虚假信息对信息寻求、回避及处理的影响:一项多国比较研究
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):586-615. doi: 10.1177/1075547020959670.
2
The Role of Pandemic Fatigue in Seeking and Avoiding Information on COVID-19 Among Young Adults.大流行疲劳在年轻成年人中寻求和避免 COVID-19 信息中的作用。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2336-2349. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2069211. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Perceived Information Overload and Unverified Information Sharing on WeChat Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated Mediation Model of Anxiety and Perceived Herd.
新冠疫情期间微信上的感知信息过载与未经证实信息分享:焦虑与感知群体效应的有调节中介模型
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;13:837820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837820. eCollection 2022.
4
The causes, impacts and countermeasures of COVID-19 "Infodemic": A systematic review using narrative synthesis.2019冠状病毒病“信息疫情”的成因、影响及应对措施:一项采用叙述性综合法的系统评价
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102713. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102713. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
Information avoidance during health crises: Predictors of avoiding information about the COVID-19 pandemic among german news consumers.健康危机期间的信息回避:德国新闻消费者中回避新冠疫情相关信息的预测因素
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102714. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102714. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
6
Understanding Online Health Risk Information Seeking and Avoiding during the COVID-19 Pandemic.理解 COVID-19 大流行期间的在线健康风险信息搜索和回避。
Health Commun. 2023 Mar;38(3):532-542. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1958981. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Misinformation Exposure and Acceptance: The Role of Information Seeking and Processing.错误信息暴露与接受:信息寻求和处理的作用。
Health Commun. 2023 Mar;38(3):585-593. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1964187. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Not just conspiracy theories: Vaccine opponents and proponents add to the COVID-19 'infodemic' on Twitter.不只是阴谋论:疫苗反对者和支持者加剧了推特上关于新冠疫情的“信息疫情”。
Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2020 Sep;1. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-38. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils.违反正态性假设可能是两害相权取其轻。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2576-2590. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Experience, experts, statistics, or just science? Predictors and consequences of reliance on different evidence types during the COVID-19 infodemic.经验、专家、统计数据,还是仅仅是科学?在 COVID-19 信息疫情期间,依赖不同证据类型的预测因素和后果。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jul;30(5):515-534. doi: 10.1177/09636625211009685. Epub 2021 Apr 23.