• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在放宽对丙型肝炎病毒治疗准入的清醒限制前后的持续病毒学应答率。

Sustained Virologic Response Rates Before and After Removal of Sobriety Restriction for Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Access.

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2023 May-Jun;138(3):467-474. doi: 10.1177/00333549221099323. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1177/00333549221099323
PMID:35674245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240896/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Until November 1, 2018, Illinois Medicaid restricted coverage of hepatitis C virus (HCV) medication to patients with sobriety from alcohol and illicit substances for ≥12 months. This policy limited treatment access for patients with a high risk of HCV transmission, despite clinical trial and real-world data demonstrating high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates among patients with substance use. The objective of this study was to compare HCV SVR rates between patients treated before and after removal of the Illinois Medicaid sobriety restriction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicaid-insured patients who completed direct-acting antiviral treatment at an urban, academic medical center in Illinois from January 1, 2014, through October 21, 2020. The primary endpoint was SVR. We compared group characteristics using χ or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables. We used logistic regression to compare SVR rates before and after the policy change, adjusting for differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients (348 pre-policy change; 148 post-policy change) started treatment; excluding loss to follow-up/early discontinuation, SVR rates were 95.4% (309 of 324) pre-policy change and 97.1% (134 of 138) post-policy change. SVR rates did not differ after adjusting for the use of historic HCV regimens and the higher cirrhosis rate in the pre-policy change group compared with the post-policy change group (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.32-3.67).

CONCLUSION

HCV SVR rates were similar before and after removal of the Illinois Medicaid sobriety restriction, regardless of group differences. Results support HCV treatment regardless of documented sobriety to facilitate progress toward HCV elimination.

摘要

目的

截至 2018 年 11 月 1 日,伊利诺伊州医疗补助计划将丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 药物的覆盖范围限制在已戒酒和戒毒 12 个月以上的患者。尽管临床试验和真实世界数据表明,在有物质使用问题的患者中,持续病毒学应答 (SVR) 率很高,但这一政策限制了 HCV 传播风险较高的患者获得治疗的机会。本研究的目的是比较在伊利诺伊州医疗补助计划取消戒酒限制前后接受治疗的患者的 HCV SVR 率。

方法

我们对 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 21 日在伊利诺伊州一家城市学术医疗中心接受直接作用抗病毒治疗的有医疗补助保险的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。主要终点是 SVR。我们使用 χ 检验或 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量的组特征,使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较连续变量的组特征。我们使用逻辑回归比较政策变化前后的 SVR 率,同时调整组间差异。

结果

共有 496 名患者(政策变化前 348 名,政策变化后 148 名)开始治疗;排除失访/提前停药,政策变化前 SVR 率为 95.4%(309/324),政策变化后 SVR 率为 97.1%(134/138)。调整历史 HCV 方案的使用和政策变化前组与政策变化后组相比更高的肝硬化率后,SVR 率没有差异(比值比=0.98;95%置信区间,0.32-3.67)。

结论

无论组间差异如何,伊利诺伊州医疗补助计划取消戒酒限制前后,HCV SVR 率相似。结果支持无论是否有记录的戒酒情况,都应进行 HCV 治疗,以促进 HCV 消除的进展。

相似文献

1
Sustained Virologic Response Rates Before and After Removal of Sobriety Restriction for Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Access.在放宽对丙型肝炎病毒治疗准入的清醒限制前后的持续病毒学应答率。
Public Health Rep. 2023 May-Jun;138(3):467-474. doi: 10.1177/00333549221099323. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
Optimal hepatitis C treatment adherence patterns and sustained virologic response among people who inject drugs: The HERO study.优化丙型肝炎治疗的依从性模式和注射吸毒者的持续病毒学应答:HERO 研究。
J Hepatol. 2024 May;80(5):702-713. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.12.020. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Factors Associated with Sustained Virologic Response to Hepatitis C Treatment in a Homeless-Experienced Cohort in Boston, 2014-2020.2014-2020 年波士顿无家可归者队列中与丙型肝炎治疗持续病毒学应答相关的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):865-872. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07778-w. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
Alcohol Use and Sustained Virologic Response to Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy.酒精使用与丙型肝炎病毒直接抗病毒治疗的持续病毒学应答。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35715.
5
Antiviral regimen complexity index as an independent predictor of sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C.抗病毒治疗方案复杂性指数作为慢性丙型肝炎患者持续病毒学应答的独立预测指标
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(6):448-53. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.6.448.
6
Progression of fibrosis in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C before and after sustained virologic response.丙型肝炎肝移植受者在持续病毒学应答前后肝纤维化的进展情况。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Oct;37(10):e15050. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15050. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
7
Hepatocellular carcinoma decreases the chance of successful hepatitis C virus therapy with direct-acting antivirals.肝细胞癌会降低使用直接作用抗病毒药物成功治疗丙型肝炎病毒的几率。
J Hepatol. 2017 Jun;66(6):1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Cure on Depressive Symptoms in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis C Virus Coinfected Population in Canada.加拿大 HIV/HCV 共感染人群中丙型肝炎病毒治愈对抑郁症状的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e702-e709. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac540.
9
Real-world effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir in hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3.达卡他韦联合索非布韦和维帕他韦/索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎 2 型和 3 型的真实世界疗效。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Effectiveness of hepatitis C antiviral treatment and feasibility of hepatitis C elimination goal.丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗的效果和消除丙型肝炎目标的可行性。
Postgrad Med. 2023 May;135(4):352-360. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2141499. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with US Medicaid Sobriety Restrictions on Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Virus: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis.美国医疗补助计划对丙型肝炎病毒直接作用抗病毒药物的戒酒限制相关的医疗保健资源利用及成本:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01487-y.
2
Alcohol Use and Sustained Virologic Response to Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy.酒精使用与丙型肝炎病毒直接抗病毒治疗的持续病毒学应答。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35715.
3
Tools Needed to Support Same-Day Diagnosis and Treatment of Current Hepatitis C Virus Infection.支持丙型肝炎病毒感染当日诊断和治疗所需的工具。
J Infect Dis. 2024 May 8;229(Supplement_3):S362-S369. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad177.

本文引用的文献

1
The Changing Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States During the Years 2010 to 2018.2010 年至 2018 年期间美国丙型肝炎病毒感染的流行变化。
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):949-955. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306149. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
The Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy on End-Stage Liver Disease Among Individuals with Chronic Hepatitis C and Substance Use Disorders.直接作用抗病毒疗法对伴有物质使用障碍的慢性丙型肝炎患者终末期肝病的影响。
Hepatology. 2021 Aug;74(2):566-581. doi: 10.1002/hep.31732. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Factors predicting staging and treatment initiation for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: insurance a key predictor.预测慢性丙型肝炎感染患者分期和治疗启动的因素:保险是关键预测因素。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Mar 7;44(1):148-157. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa276.
4
Estimating the Year Each State in the United States Will Achieve the World Health Organization's Elimination Targets for Hepatitis C.估算美国各州实现世界卫生组织丙型肝炎消除目标的年份。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):423-440. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01535-3. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Low Adherence Achieves High HCV Cure Rates Among People Who Inject Drugs Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents.在接受直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的注射吸毒人群中,低依从性也能实现高丙型肝炎病毒治愈率。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 26;7(10):ofaa377. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa377. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Enforcement of Legal Remedies to Secure Hepatitis C Virus Treatment With Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapies in Correctional Facilities and Medicaid Programs.通过法律手段确保在惩教机构和医疗补助计划中使用直接作用抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎病毒
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(1_suppl):44S-49S. doi: 10.1177/0033354920904608.
7
Concurrent Initiation of Hepatitis C and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in People Who Inject Drugs.同时启动丙型肝炎和阿片类药物使用障碍治疗在注射吸毒者中。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1715-1722. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa105.
8
Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.《2019年丙型肝炎指南更新:美国肝病研究协会-美国传染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染检测、管理及治疗的建议》
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):686-721. doi: 10.1002/hep.31060.
9
Efficacy of Direct-acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in People Who Inject Drugs or Receive Opioid Substitution Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗注射吸毒或接受阿片类药物替代治疗的慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 23;70(11):2355-2365. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz696.
10
Expanding Hepatitis C Virus Care and Cure: National Experience Using a Clinical Pharmacist-Driven Model.扩大丙型肝炎病毒的治疗与治愈:采用临床药剂师主导模式的国家经验
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 1;6(7). doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz316.