Richmond D H, Sutherst J R, Brown M C
Br J Urol. 1987 Mar;59(3):224-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04610.x.
Two variations on a test for quantifying urine loss in patients with urinary incontinence were compared. In the first series (Padtest 1), 335 patients underwent a 2-h pad weighing test. A fluid load of 1 litre was administered and followed 1 h later by six separate exercises, each lasting 10 min. One of six sanitary towels was worn during each exercise. Each pad was weighed before and after use to provide information about the severity of the incontinence. In the second series (Padtest 2), 104 patients were studied. The test took the same format but the exercises were rearranged in an attempt to provide information about the importance of the individual exercises. Hand washing was found to be a very provocative test both in women with unstable and those with stable bladders. The order in which the exercises were performed did not influence the overall identification of incontinence in the 2-h test period, and this supports the conclusion that the optimum length of the test is 2 h.
对两种用于量化尿失禁患者尿液流失的测试方法进行了比较。在第一个系列（护垫测试1）中，335名患者接受了2小时的护垫称重测试。给予1升液体负荷，1小时后进行六个单独的练习，每个练习持续10分钟。每个练习期间佩戴六片卫生巾中的一片。每个护垫在使用前后称重，以提供有关尿失禁严重程度的信息。在第二个系列（护垫测试2）中，研究了104名患者。测试采用相同的形式，但对练习进行了重新安排，以试图提供有关各个练习重要性的信息。发现洗手对膀胱不稳定和稳定的女性都是一种非常刺激性的测试。在2小时的测试期内，练习的执行顺序并不影响对尿失禁的总体识别，这支持了测试的最佳时长为2小时这一结论。
