• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纠正对枪支政策支持的误解可以促进枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者之间的群体间合作。

Correcting misperceptions of gun policy support can foster intergroup cooperation between gun owners and non-gun owners.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268601. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268601
PMID:35675228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9176832/
Abstract

Past research finds that a majority of gun and non-gun owners support key gun safety policies, yet gun owners tend to underestimate other gun owners' support for these policies. We predicted that these misperceptions of support might lead gun owners to view non-gun owners as being less similar to themselves, which might undermine intergroup cooperation to promote gun safety policies and fuel intergroup animosity. Importantly, we also predicted that correcting these misperceptions would be an effective way to reduce intergroup division and enhance intergroup cooperation. We tested these predictions across two studies in which participants were randomly assigned to read information designed to correct misperceptions of gun owner support or to read other, control information. Across both studies, we find that correcting gun owners' misperceptions of gun owner support for gun safety policies leads to greater perceptions of identity overlap between gun and non-gun owners, greater willingness to work with each other to promote gun safety policies, and less negative affect towards each other. This suggests that correcting gun owner misperceptions of gun owners' support for gun safety policies might be an effective intervention to facilitate intergroup cooperation to promote these policies. Therefore, efforts to promote gun safety policies might benefit from educating gun owners about the degree of support for these policies that already exists among gun owners. Doing so might present a simple and cost-effective way to mobilize gun owners in support of these policies.

摘要

过去的研究发现,大多数枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者都支持关键的枪支安全政策,但枪支拥有者往往低估了其他枪支拥有者对这些政策的支持。我们预测,这些对支持的误解可能导致枪支拥有者认为非枪支拥有者与自己的相似度更低,这可能会破坏促进枪支安全政策的群体间合作,并加剧群体间的敌意。重要的是,我们还预测,纠正这些误解将是减少群体间分歧和增强群体间合作的有效途径。我们在两项研究中检验了这些预测,在这些研究中,参与者被随机分配阅读旨在纠正对枪支拥有者支持枪支安全政策的误解的信息或阅读其他控制信息。在这两项研究中,我们发现,纠正枪支拥有者对枪支安全政策的枪支拥有者支持的误解会导致枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者之间的身份重叠感更大,更愿意彼此合作以促进枪支安全政策,彼此之间的负面情绪也更少。这表明,纠正枪支拥有者对枪支安全政策的枪支拥有者支持的误解可能是促进群体间合作以促进这些政策的有效干预措施。因此,促进枪支安全政策的努力可能会受益于教育枪支拥有者了解枪支拥有者对这些政策的支持程度。这样做可能是动员枪支拥有者支持这些政策的一种简单且具有成本效益的方式。

相似文献

1
Correcting misperceptions of gun policy support can foster intergroup cooperation between gun owners and non-gun owners.纠正对枪支政策支持的误解可以促进枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者之间的群体间合作。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268601. eCollection 2022.
2
Gun violence prevention policy: Perceived and actual levels of gun owner support.枪支暴力预防政策:枪支拥有者支持的认知水平与实际水平
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 17;35:102324. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102324. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Public Opinion Perceptions, Private Support, and Public Actions of US Adults Regarding Gun Safety Policy.美国成年人对枪支安全政策的公众意见认知、私人支持和公众行为。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29571.
4
Gun owners' assessment of gun safety policy: their underlying principles and detailed opinions.枪支拥有者对枪支安全政策的评估:其基本原则和详细观点。
Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 17;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00430-z.
5
Trends In Public Opinion On US Gun Laws: Majorities Of Gun Owners And Non-Gun Owners Support A Range Of Measures.美国枪支法律民意趋势:枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者的多数人支持一系列措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Oct;38(10):1727-1734. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00576. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non-Gun Owners in 2017.2017 年枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者对枪支暴力预防政策的公众支持
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jul;108(7):878-881. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304432. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
The effectiveness of value-based messages to engage gun owners on firearm policies: a three-stage nested study.基于价值观的信息在促使枪支拥有者参与枪支政策方面的有效性:一项三阶段嵌套研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 3;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40621-022-00394-6.
8
Assessment of Reasons for Ownership and Attitudes About Policies Among Firearm Owners With and Without Children.评估有子女和无子女枪支拥有者的拥有原因和政策态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42995.
9
Optimism Bias Among Gun Owners: Associations With Firearm Injury Prevention Practices and Policy Support.枪支拥有者中的乐观偏差:与枪支伤害预防措施及政策支持的关联。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Jun;52(3):266-277. doi: 10.1177/10901981241267212. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
10
Differences in Public Support for Gun Policies Between Women and Men.公众对枪支政策的支持在男女之间存在差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e9-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization: A Qualitative Study of Professionals in Oregon.专业培训与公众教育有助于极端风险保护令的实施:一项对俄勒冈州专业人员的定性研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371379. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371379. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Gun violence prevention policy: Perceived and actual levels of gun owner support.枪支暴力预防政策:枪支拥有者支持的认知水平与实际水平
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 17;35:102324. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102324. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Opinion Perceptions, Private Support, and Public Actions of US Adults Regarding Gun Safety Policy.美国成年人对枪支安全政策的公众意见认知、私人支持和公众行为。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29571.
2
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America.情感极化、局部语境与美国舆论
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States.枪支政策科学:对美国枪支政策影响的研究证据的批判性综合分析
Rand Health Q. 2018 Aug 2;8(1):5. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non-Gun Owners in 2017.2017 年枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者对枪支暴力预防政策的公众支持
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jul;108(7):878-881. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304432. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Reducing gun violence in America.减少美国的枪支暴力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 14;114(46):12097-12099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717306114. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Firearm Laws and Firearm Homicides: A Systematic Review.枪支法律与枪支杀人事件:系统综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):106-119. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7051.
7
Defying the odds on gun regulation: The passage of bipartisan mental health laws across the states.打破枪支管制的困境:两党支持的心理健康法在各州获得通过。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 May;85(3):203-10. doi: 10.1037/ort0000068.
8
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.内群体偏好合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1556-81. doi: 10.1037/a0037737. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
9
Public health approach to the prevention of gun violence.预防枪支暴力的公共卫生方法。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):2033-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1302631. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
10
Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets.整合数据分析:对多个数据集进行同步分析。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):81-100. doi: 10.1037/a0015914.