Suppr超能文献

特定 IgE 与总 IgE 比值并不能提高成人花生过敏诊断的准确性。

Specific IgE to Total IgE Ratio Does Not Improve Peanut Diagnostic Accuracy in Adults.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(9):980-984. doi: 10.1159/000524847. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peanut specific IgE (sIgE) can lead to false-positive results.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess whether peanut sIgE to total IgE (tIgE) ratio improves accuracy in predicting clinical reactivity to peanut compared to peanut sIgE alone, which has not been explored in the adult population so far.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review was performed for adults who underwent peanut oral food challenge (OFC) and/or oral immunotherapy (OIT) at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal's allergy clinic between January 2017 and July 2021. Patients with positive peanut OFC and/or undergoing OIT were considered peanut-allergic. Patients with negative OFC were considered peanut-tolerant. Peanut sIgE to tIgE ratios were calculated and performance characteristics of the sIgE to tIgE ratio were compared to sIgE alone by using receiver operator characteristics curves.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were included (52% male) with a median age of 26 years (range 14-54). Forty-five percent had atopic dermatitis. Median sIgE levels were 2.64 kUA/L (range 0.1-100), median tIgE levels were 154 kUA/L (range 19-3,400), and median sIgE to tIgE ratio was 0.66% (range 0.04-38.3). Twenty-four patients (57%) were classified as peanut-allergic and 18 (43%) as peanut tolerant. The area under the curve for peanut sIgE was 0.921 compared to 0.926 for peanut sIgE/tIgE (p not statistically significant).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that there was no significant benefit in using peanut sIgE to tIgE ratio over sIgE alone to predict peanut reactivity in an adult population. Larger prospective studies are needed to further confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

花生特异性 IgE(sIgE)可能导致假阳性结果。

目的

我们旨在评估与单独的花生 sIgE 相比,花生 sIgE 与总 IgE(tIgE)的比值是否能提高预测对花生临床反应的准确性,迄今为止,这在成人人群中尚未得到探索。

方法

对 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间在蒙特利尔大学附属医院过敏诊所接受花生口服食物挑战(OFC)和/或口服免疫治疗(OIT)的成年人进行了回顾性图表审查。阳性花生 OFC 和/或接受 OIT 的患者被认为是花生过敏。阴性 OFC 的患者被认为是耐受花生的。计算了花生 sIgE 与 tIgE 的比值,并通过使用接收者操作特征曲线比较了 sIgE 与 tIgE 比值的性能特征与单独的 sIgE。

结果

共纳入 42 例患者(52%为男性),中位年龄为 26 岁(范围 14-54 岁)。45%的患者患有特应性皮炎。中位 sIgE 水平为 2.64 kUA/L(范围 0.1-100),中位 tIgE 水平为 154 kUA/L(范围 19-3400),中位 sIgE 与 tIgE 的比值为 0.66%(范围 0.04-38.3)。24 例患者(57%)被归类为花生过敏,18 例(43%)为花生耐受。花生 sIgE 的曲线下面积为 0.921,而花生 sIgE/tIgE 的曲线下面积为 0.926(无统计学意义)。

结论

我们发现,在成人人群中,使用花生 sIgE 与 tIgE 的比值来预测花生反应,并没有比单独使用 sIgE 带来明显的益处。需要更大的前瞻性研究来进一步证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验