• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动检测任务中对中央和周边视觉空间的关注。III. 听觉剥夺和视觉语言习得的单独影响。

Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language.

作者信息

Neville H J, Lawson D

出版信息

Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):284-94. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6.

DOI:10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6
PMID:3567606
Abstract

We employed event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and measures of signal detectability to compare attention to peripheral and central visual stimuli in normal hearing subjects who were born to deaf parents (HD Ss) and whose first language was American Sign Language (ASL). The results were compared with those obtained from normal hearing Ss and congenitally deaf Ss in the same paradigm. Task performance and ERPs during attention to the foveal region were similar in the 3 groups. In contrast, with attention to the peripheral stimuli the deaf Ss displayed attention effects over the occipital regions of both hemispheres that were several times larger than those in the hearing and the HD Ss. However, both HD and deaf Ss displayed lateral asymmetries in behavior and ERPs that were opposite in direction to those of the hearing Ss. Whereas hearing Ss detected the direction of target motion better when it occurred in the left visual field, deaf and HD Ss performed better for right visual field targets. Consistent with these results, the amplitude of the attention-related increases in the ERPs were larger from temporal and parietal regions of the right than the left hemisphere in hearing Ss, but were larger from the left than the right hemisphere in both the HD and the deaf Ss. These results suggest that auditory deprivation and the acquisition of a visual language have marked and different effects on the development of cortical specializations in humans.

摘要

我们采用事件相关脑电位(ERP)和信号检测能力测量方法,比较了父母为聋人的正常听力受试者(HD受试者)对周边和中央视觉刺激的注意力,这些受试者的第一语言是美国手语(ASL)。将结果与在相同范式下从正常听力受试者和先天性聋人受试者获得的结果进行比较。在关注中央凹区域时,三组受试者的任务表现和ERP相似。相比之下,在关注周边刺激时,聋人受试者在两个半球的枕叶区域显示出的注意力效应比听力受试者和HD受试者大几倍。然而,HD受试者和聋人受试者在行为和ERP上都表现出与听力受试者方向相反的侧向不对称。听力受试者在左视野出现目标运动时能更好地检测到目标运动方向,而聋人和HD受试者在右视野目标上表现更好。与这些结果一致,听力受试者ERP中与注意力相关的增加幅度在右半球的颞叶和顶叶区域比左半球大,而在HD受试者和聋人受试者中,左半球比右半球大。这些结果表明,听觉剥夺和视觉语言的习得对人类皮质特化的发展有显著且不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language.运动检测任务中对中央和周边视觉空间的关注。III. 听觉剥夺和视觉语言习得的单独影响。
Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):284-94. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6.
2
Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults.
Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):268-83. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90296-4.
3
Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.聋人和听力正常的手语使用者在运动处理方面的视野不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):170-81. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1498.
4
Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex.比较听觉剥夺和手语在听觉皮层和视觉皮层内的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1621-37. doi: 10.1162/089892905774597173.
5
Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language.聋人群体与听力正常人群体的视觉对比敏感度:探究听觉剥夺的感知后果以及使用视觉语言的体验。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):171-83. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00082-3.
6
Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults.运动检测任务中对中央和周边视觉空间的注意:一项事件相关电位及行为学研究。I. 听力正常的成年人。
Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):253-67. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90295-2.
7
The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.空间注意力对聋人手语使用者、听力正常的手语使用者和听力正常的非手语使用者运动处理的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):152-69. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1497.
8
Effects of attention and laterality on motion and orientation discrimination in deaf signers.聋人使用者在注意力和偏侧性对运动和方向辨别上的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Jun;82(1):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
9
Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing.早期耳聋及早期接触手语对大脑运动处理组织的影响。
J Neurosci. 2001 Nov 15;21(22):8931-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-22-08931.2001.
10
Visual-spatial processing in deaf brain-damaged signers.失聪脑损伤手语使用者的视觉空间处理
Brain Cogn. 1984 Jul;3(3):281-306. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(84)90022-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of sign language learning on temporal resolution of visual attention.手语学习对视觉注意力时间分辨率的影响。
J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.3.
2
Investigating the impact of early deafness on learned action-effect contingency for action linked to peripheral sensory effects.研究早期失聪对与外周感觉效应相关的动作的学习动作-效应关联的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Sep 9;202:108964. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108964. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Research of visual attention networks in deaf individuals: a systematic review.
聋人视觉注意力网络的研究:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1369941. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369941. eCollection 2024.
4
The Development of Multisensory Integration at the Neuronal Level.神经元水平的多感觉整合发展。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1437:153-172. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-7611-9_10.
5
Sign language experience has little effect on face and biomotion perception in bimodal bilinguals.手语经验对视知觉和运动知觉的影响在双语双模态者中较小。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 15;13(1):15328. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41636-x.
6
Crossmodal plasticity in hearing loss.听力损失的跨模态可塑性。
Trends Neurosci. 2023 May;46(5):377-393. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Somatosensory processing in deaf and deafblind individuals: How does the brain adapt as a function of sensory and linguistic experience? A critical review.聋人和聋盲个体的体感加工:大脑如何根据感觉和语言经验进行适应?一项批判性综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 17;13:938842. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938842. eCollection 2022.
8
How sign language expertise can influence the effects of face masks on non-linguistic characteristics.手语专业知识如何影响口罩对面部非语言特征的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jun 23;7(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00405-6.
9
Functional connectivity alteration of the deprived auditory regions with cognitive networks in deaf and inattentive adolescents.聋和注意力不集中青少年的剥夺听觉区域与认知网络的功能连接改变。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Apr;16(2):939-954. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00632-x. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
10
Neural correlates of visual stimulus encoding and verbal working memory differ between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.人工耳蜗使用者与正常听力对照者在视觉刺激编码和言语工作记忆的神经相关方面存在差异。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Aug;54(3):5016-5037. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15365. Epub 2021 Jul 9.