Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Road, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2229-2239. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Memory tends to be better when items are processed for their meaning (deep processing) rather than their perceptual features (shallow processing). This levels of processing (LOP) effect is well-replicated and has been applied in many settings, but the mechanisms involved are still not well understood. The temporal contiguity effect (TCE), the finding that recalling one event often triggers recall of another event experienced nearby in time, also predicts memory performance. This effect has given rise to several competing theories with specific contiguity-generating mechanisms related to how items are processed. Therefore, studying how LOP and the TCE interact may shed light on the mechanisms underlying both effects. However, it is unknown how LOP and the TCE interact-various theories make differing predictions. In this preregistered study, we tested predictions of three theoretical explanations: accounts which assume temporal information is automatically encoded, accounts based on a trade-off between item and order information, and accounts which emphasize the importance of strategic control processes. Participants completed an immediate free recall task where they either engaged in deep processing, shallow processing, or no additional task while studying each word. Recall and the TCE were highest for no-task lists and greater for deep than shallow processing. Our results support theories which assume temporal associations are automatically encoded and those which emphasize strategic control processes. Both perspectives should be considered in theory development. These findings also suggest temporal information may contribute to better recall under deeper processing with implications for determining which situations benefit from deep processing.
当项目是根据其含义(深度处理)而不是其感知特征(浅层处理)进行处理时,记忆往往会更好。这种加工水平(LOP)效应得到了很好的复制,并已应用于许多环境中,但涉及的机制仍未得到很好的理解。时间连续性效应(TCE),即回忆一个事件通常会触发对时间上附近经历的另一个事件的回忆,也可以预测记忆表现。该效应引发了几种具有特定连续性生成机制的竞争理论,这些机制与项目的处理方式有关。因此,研究 LOP 和 TCE 如何相互作用可能有助于揭示这两种效应的潜在机制。然而,目前尚不清楚 LOP 和 TCE 是如何相互作用的——各种理论做出了不同的预测。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们测试了三种理论解释的预测:假设时间信息自动编码的解释、基于项目和顺序信息之间权衡的解释以及强调战略控制过程重要性的解释。参与者完成了一项即时自由回忆任务,在学习每个单词时,他们要么进行深度处理、浅层处理,要么不进行任何额外任务。无任务列表的回忆和 TCE 最高,深度处理比浅层处理更高。我们的结果支持那些假设时间关联自动编码的理论以及那些强调战略控制过程的理论。在理论发展中都应该考虑这两个观点。这些发现还表明,时间信息可能有助于在更深层次的处理下更好地回忆,这对确定哪些情况受益于深层次处理具有启示意义。