The Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; The School of Brain Sciences and Cognition, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105647. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105647. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Temporal-structure, namely, the order in which events unfold over time, is one of the fundamental principles of episodic memory organization. A seminal empirical demonstration of the prominence of temporal structure in memory organization is the Temporal Contiguity Effect (TCE), whereby the proximity between two items at encoding predicts the likelihood of those two items being retrieved consecutively during recall. Recent studies have found that TCE occurs under a wide variety of conditions in which strategic control processes at encoding are reduced or even eliminated. This suggests that the encoding of temporal structure occurs automatically. Extending these findings, in the current study we asked whether the retrieval of temporal structure, as reflected by indices of the TCE, is influenced by strategic control processes at retrieval. To manipulate participants' ability to rely on strategic control processes, we compared standard recall performance (Full Attention condition) to a condition in which attention was divided between recall and a concurrent task (Divided Attention condition), which has been shown to disrupt such control processes. Across two experiments-one with standard encoding conditions and one with continual distraction during encoding-we found no differences in any index of the TCE between the two conditions. These results are all the more striking considering that in both experiments, dividing attention negatively affected overall recall performance compared to the Full Attention condition. Thus, while recall performance is reduced when disrupting strategic processes, the ability to use temporal structure to drive recall is not affected.
时间结构,即事件随时间展开的顺序,是情节记忆组织的基本原则之一。时间连续性效应(TCE)是时间结构在记忆组织中突出地位的一个重要实证范例,即在编码时两个项目之间的接近程度预测了在回忆过程中这两个项目连续被检索的可能性。最近的研究发现,在编码时减少甚至消除策略性控制过程的各种条件下,都会出现 TCE。这表明时间结构的编码是自动发生的。在目前的研究中,我们扩展了这些发现,询问了时间结构的检索,即 TCE 指标的反映,是否受到检索时策略性控制过程的影响。为了操纵参与者依赖策略性控制过程的能力,我们将标准回忆表现(全注意条件)与注意力在回忆和并发任务之间分配的条件(分散注意力条件)进行了比较,后者已被证明会破坏这种控制过程。在两个实验中,一个实验采用标准编码条件,另一个实验在编码过程中持续分心,我们发现这两种条件下 TCE 的任何指标都没有差异。考虑到在两个实验中,与全注意条件相比,分散注意力都会对整体回忆表现产生负面影响,这些结果更加引人注目。因此,虽然扰乱策略性过程会降低回忆表现,但利用时间结构来驱动回忆的能力并未受到影响。