• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

携手共进,更强有力:探究职场尊严与职场包容性对员工工作绩效的交互作用

Stronger Together: Examining the Interaction Effects of Workplace Dignity and Workplace Inclusion on Employees' Job Performance.

作者信息

Ahmed Ammarah, Liang Dapeng, Anjum Muhammad Adeel, Durrani Dilawar Khan

机构信息

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Department of Management Sciences, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:891189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891189. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891189
PMID:35677141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9168755/
Abstract

Despite growing interest in workplace dignity, there is a paucity of empirical research regarding whether and when it leads to higher job performance. To address these research gaps, this study examines the relationship between workplace dignity and job performance, identifying and examining the boundary condition role of workplace inclusion. Multi-source and time-lagged data were obtained from employee-supervisor dyads ( = 169) in non-governmental organizations in Pakistan to test the hypothesized model, employing techniques, such as confirmatory factor analysis, moderated multiple regression, post-hoc slope, and Johnson-Neyman analyses. As predicted, workplace dignity and workplace inclusion positively influenced employees' job performance, while workplace inclusion moderated the dignity-performance relationship such that this relationship was more strongly positive when workplace inclusion was high. At the theoretical level, this study adds new insights to the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, which is used as theoretical lens in this study. Specifically, this study is the first to examine workplace dignity and its consequences from the perspective of the JD-R model, thus introducing a new theoretical perspective into the dignity literature. This study also provides useful advice for management practice, policymaking, and employees, and is germane to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 8.

摘要

尽管人们对工作场所尊严的兴趣日益浓厚,但关于它是否以及何时能带来更高工作绩效的实证研究却很匮乏。为了填补这些研究空白,本研究考察了工作场所尊严与工作绩效之间的关系,识别并检验了工作场所包容性的边界条件作用。从巴基斯坦非政府组织的员工-主管二元组(n = 169)中获取多源和时间滞后数据,以检验假设模型,采用了验证性因素分析、调节多元回归、事后斜率分析和约翰逊-内曼分析等技术。正如预测的那样,工作场所尊严和工作场所包容性对员工的工作绩效有积极影响,而工作场所包容性调节了尊严-绩效关系,使得当工作场所包容性较高时,这种关系的正向性更强。在理论层面,本研究为工作需求-资源(JD-R)模型增添了新的见解,该模型在本研究中作为理论视角。具体而言,本研究首次从JD-R模型的角度考察工作场所尊严及其后果,从而为尊严文献引入了一个新的理论视角。本研究还为管理实践、政策制定和员工提供了有用的建议,并且与联合国可持续发展目标8相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf39/9168755/12c5df912244/fpsyg-13-891189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf39/9168755/4ea63d379348/fpsyg-13-891189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf39/9168755/12c5df912244/fpsyg-13-891189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf39/9168755/4ea63d379348/fpsyg-13-891189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf39/9168755/12c5df912244/fpsyg-13-891189-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Stronger Together: Examining the Interaction Effects of Workplace Dignity and Workplace Inclusion on Employees' Job Performance.携手共进,更强有力:探究职场尊严与职场包容性对员工工作绩效的交互作用
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:891189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891189. eCollection 2022.
2
High-performance HR practices, job demands and employee well-being: The moderating role of managerial support.高绩效人力资源实践、工作要求与员工福祉:管理支持的调节作用。
Stress Health. 2023 Dec;39(5):1106-1123. doi: 10.1002/smi.3252. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Workplace empowerment, psychological empowerment and work-related wellbeing in southeast Asian employees: a cross-sectional survey.东南亚员工的工作场所赋权、心理赋权与工作相关幸福感:一项横断面调查。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac113.
4
The Mediating Effects of Work Characteristics on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employee Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.工作特征在变革型领导与员工幸福感关系中的中介作用:一项元分析研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;19(5):3133. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053133.
5
Analysis of factors affecting employee satisfaction: A case study from Pakistan.影响员工满意度的因素分析:来自巴基斯坦的案例研究。
Work. 2015;52(1):137-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152039.
6
How Workplace Bullying Jeopardizes Employees' Life Satisfaction: The Roles of Job Anxiety and Insomnia.职场霸凌如何危及员工的生活满意度:工作焦虑和失眠的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02292. eCollection 2019.
7
Do Resources Help or Hurt? The Critical Roles of Me, Others, and Organization in Mitigating Workplace Demands.资源是助力还是阻碍?“我”、他人及组织在缓解工作压力中的关键作用。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 14:332941231206354. doi: 10.1177/00332941231206354.
8
Digital Job Demands and Resources: Digitization in the Context of the Job Demands-Resources Model.数字工作要求与资源:工作要求-资源模型背景下的数字化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 15;20(16):6581. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166581.
9
Why Employees Experience Burnout: An Explanation of Illegitimate Tasks.员工为何会出现倦怠:对非正当任务的解释。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158923.
10
IS THIS (TELE)WORKING? A path model analysis of the relationship between telework, job demands and job resources, and sustainable employability.这(远程)工作可行吗?对远程工作、工作需求与工作资源以及可持续就业能力之间关系的路径模型分析
Work. 2025 Jan;80(1):295-313. doi: 10.3233/WOR-240033. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Can mindfulness overcome the effects of workplace ostracism on job performance?正念能否克服工作场所排斥对工作绩效的影响?
J Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;160(5):589-602. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1707465. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
Dignity at the Workplace: Evolution of the Construct and Development of Workplace Dignity Scale.工作场所的尊严:概念的演变与工作场所尊严量表的开发
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 29;10:2581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02581. eCollection 2019.
3
Increasing Metacognitive Capacity by Disrupting Implicit Leader Prototypes.
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2018 Sep;2018(159):53-64. doi: 10.1002/yd.20297.
4
The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale.《体面工作量表的编制与初步验证》
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Mar;64(2):206-221. doi: 10.1037/cou0000191. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes.与感知到的工作能力及劳动力结果相关的个人因素和工作因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):376-98. doi: 10.1037/a0037974. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Constructions of dignity: a pre-requisite for flourishing in the workplace?尊严的构建:职场中繁荣的必要条件?
Int J Older People Nurs. 2010 Jun;5(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2010.00218.x.
7
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
8
Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance.关于员工积极情绪与任务绩效关联模型的测试。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1570-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1570.
9
The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance.人格与职场社会交换关系对任务绩效和公民绩效预测的联合效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1286-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1286.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.