Xiang Mingyue, Liu Bo, Zhang Guifang, Gong Heyi, Han Dali, Ma Changsheng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 23;12:813021. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.813021. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (I-CCRT), induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (I-CCRT-C), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCRT-C) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC).
Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel from February 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate survival. Efficacy was assessed using RECIST, version 1.0. Prognosis factors were identified with Cox regression analysis.
Patients were treated with CCRT-C ( = 59), I-CCRT ( = 20), and I-CCRT-C ( = 48). The median follow-up duration was 73.9 months for the entire cohort. The ORR of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 89.8%, 70.0%, and 77.1%, respectively ( = 0.078). The median PFS in the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 32.5, 16.1, and 27.1 months, respectively ( = 0.464). The median OS of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 45.9, 35.5, and 54.0 months, respectively ( = 0.788). Cox regression analysis indicated that I-CCRT-C and I-CCRT did not significantly prolong PFS and OS compared with CCRT-C ( > 0.05). Neutropenia grade ≥3 in CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 47.5%, 15%, and 33.3% of patients, respectively ( = 0.027).
I-CCRT and I-CCRT-C using cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel regimen are not superior to CCRT-C in survival but seem to have less severe neutropenia than CCRT-C. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.
本研究旨在比较诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗(I-CCRT)、诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗及巩固化疗(I-CCRT-C)以及同步放化疗后序贯巩固化疗(CCRT-C)治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESSC)的疗效和安全性。
回顾性分析2012年2月至2018年12月期间接受顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶或多西他赛根治性放化疗的局部晚期ESCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存情况。使用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.0版评估疗效。通过Cox回归分析确定预后因素。
患者分别接受CCRT-C(n = 59)、I-CCRT(n = 20)和I-CCRT-C(n = 48)治疗。整个队列的中位随访时间为73.9个月。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为89.8%、70.0%和77.1%(P = 0.078)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为32.5、16.1和27.1个月(P = 0.464)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为45.9、35.5和54.0个月(P = 0.788)。Cox回归分析表明,与CCRT-C相比,I-CCRT-C和I-CCRT并未显著延长PFS和OS(P>0.05)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组中≥3级中性粒细胞减少的患者分别占47.5%、15%和33.3%(P = 0.027)。
采用顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶或多西他赛方案的I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C在生存方面并不优于CCRT-C,但中性粒细胞减少似乎比CCRT-C轻。有必要进行进一步的随机对照研究。