Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗后行同步放化疗联合或不联合巩固化疗与同步放化疗后行巩固化疗治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的比较

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Consolidation Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

作者信息

Xiang Mingyue, Liu Bo, Zhang Guifang, Gong Heyi, Han Dali, Ma Changsheng

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 May 23;12:813021. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.813021. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (I-CCRT), induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (I-CCRT-C), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCRT-C) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel from February 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate survival. Efficacy was assessed using RECIST, version 1.0. Prognosis factors were identified with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with CCRT-C ( = 59), I-CCRT ( = 20), and I-CCRT-C ( = 48). The median follow-up duration was 73.9 months for the entire cohort. The ORR of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 89.8%, 70.0%, and 77.1%, respectively ( = 0.078). The median PFS in the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 32.5, 16.1, and 27.1 months, respectively ( = 0.464). The median OS of the CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 45.9, 35.5, and 54.0 months, respectively ( = 0.788). Cox regression analysis indicated that I-CCRT-C and I-CCRT did not significantly prolong PFS and OS compared with CCRT-C ( > 0.05). Neutropenia grade ≥3 in CCRT-C, I-CCRT, and I-CCRT-C groups was 47.5%, 15%, and 33.3% of patients, respectively ( = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

I-CCRT and I-CCRT-C using cisplatin plus fluorouracil or docetaxel regimen are not superior to CCRT-C in survival but seem to have less severe neutropenia than CCRT-C. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗(I-CCRT)、诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗及巩固化疗(I-CCRT-C)以及同步放化疗后序贯巩固化疗(CCRT-C)治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESSC)的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

回顾性分析2012年2月至2018年12月期间接受顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶或多西他赛根治性放化疗的局部晚期ESCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估生存情况。使用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.0版评估疗效。通过Cox回归分析确定预后因素。

结果

患者分别接受CCRT-C(n = 59)、I-CCRT(n = 20)和I-CCRT-C(n = 48)治疗。整个队列的中位随访时间为73.9个月。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为89.8%、70.0%和77.1%(P = 0.078)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为32.5、16.1和27.1个月(P = 0.464)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为45.9、35.5和54.0个月(P = 0.788)。Cox回归分析表明,与CCRT-C相比,I-CCRT-C和I-CCRT并未显著延长PFS和OS(P>0.05)。CCRT-C、I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C组中≥3级中性粒细胞减少的患者分别占47.5%、15%和33.3%(P = 0.027)。

结论

采用顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶或多西他赛方案的I-CCRT和I-CCRT-C在生存方面并不优于CCRT-C,但中性粒细胞减少似乎比CCRT-C轻。有必要进行进一步的随机对照研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验