State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 29;12(1):4014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24288-1.
This randomized phase II trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CRT alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) unsuitable for surgery (N = 110). The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), whereas the secondary outcome was overall survival. This trial did not meet pre-specified endpoints. The ORR was 74.5% in the induction chemotherapy group versus 61.8% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.152). The 3-year overall survival rate was 41.8% in the induction chemotherapy group and 38.1% in the CRT alone group (P = 0.584; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.41). Grade 3-5 adverse events were similar. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had improved survival in the post-hoc analysis. These results demonstrate no improvement in response rate or survival with the addition of induction chemotherapy to CRT in unselected patients with ESCC. Trial number: NCT02403531.
这项随机的 II 期临床试验旨在比较诱导化疗后行根治性放化疗(CRT)与单纯 CRT 治疗不适合手术的食管鳞癌(ESCC)患者的疗效和安全性(N=110)。主要终点是总缓解率(ORR),次要终点是总生存期。本试验未达到预设终点。诱导化疗组的 ORR 为 74.5%,单纯 CRT 组为 61.8%(P=0.152)。诱导化疗组的 3 年总生存率为 41.8%,单纯 CRT 组为 38.1%(P=0.584;风险比,0.88;95%CI,0.54-1.41)。3-5 级不良事件相似。在事后分析中,对诱导化疗有反应的患者生存得到改善。这些结果表明,在未选择的 ESCC 患者中,CRT 加用诱导化疗并未提高反应率或生存率。试验编号:NCT02403531。