Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的骨折比较风险:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Comparative Risks of Fracture Among Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Tsai Sung Huang Laurent, Hu Ching-Wei, Shao Shih-Chieh, Tischler Eric H, Obisesan Olufunmilayo H, Vervoort Dominique, Chen Wei Cheng, Hu Jiun-Ruey, Kuo Liang-Tseng

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung City, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 23;9:896952. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.896952. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Previous studies have shown the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including lower fracture risks, compared to warfarin. However, direct or indirect comparisons between different DOACs are scarce in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare fracture risks among different DOACs and warfarin, including apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the fracture risks among patients who used warfarin or DOACs, up to March 2021. Two authors extracted data and appraised the risk of bias of included studies. The primary outcome was fracture risk. We performed pairwise meta-analyses to compare differences between medications and network meta-analyses using frequentist random-effects models to compare through indirect evidence. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks to determine the probability of a DOAC ranking best in terms of fracture risk.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials and seven cohort studies with 455,343 patients were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. Compared to warfarin, the risk of any fractures was lowest with apixaban [relative risk (RR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.73], followed by rivaroxaban (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86), edoxaban (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62-1.23), and dabigatran (RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.75-1.07). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

All DOACs were safer than warfarin concerning the risk of fracture; however, apixaban had the lowest relative risk of fracture within the class of DOACs. Further head-to-head prospective studies should confirm the comparative safety profiles of DOACs regarding fractures.

摘要

重要性

既往研究已表明,与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)具有有效性和安全性,包括较低的骨折风险。然而,不同DOACs之间的直接或间接比较在文献中较为少见。

目的

本研究旨在比较非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)或静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者中不同DOACs与华法林(包括阿哌沙班、利伐沙班、达比加群和依度沙班)之间的骨折风险。

方法

我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL和Web of Science,以查找截至2021年3月比较使用华法林或DOACs患者骨折风险的随机对照试验和队列研究。两位作者提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。主要结局为骨折风险。我们进行了成对荟萃分析以比较药物之间的差异,并使用频率随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析以通过间接证据进行比较。我们使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)和平均秩次来确定DOAC在骨折风险方面排名最佳的概率。

结果

最终分析纳入了31项研究。系统评价和网络荟萃分析纳入了24项随机对照试验和7项队列研究,共455,343例患者。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的任何骨折风险最低[相对风险(RR)=0.59;95%置信区间(CI):0.48 - 0.73],其次是利伐沙班(RR:0.72;95%CI:0.60 - 0.86)、依度沙班(RR:0.88;95%CI:0.62 - 1.23)和达比加群(RR = 0.90;95%CI:0.75 - 1.07)。所有结局的直接和间接证据之间均未检测到实质性不一致。

结论

就骨折风险而言,所有DOACs均比华法林更安全;然而,在DOACs类别中,阿哌沙班的骨折相对风险最低。进一步的直接比较前瞻性研究应证实DOACs在骨折方面的比较安全性概况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0344/9168033/da893bd5faa0/fcvm-09-896952-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验