• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁能得到呼吸机?COVID-19 大流行第一波期间,重症监护医师对分诊的多中心调查。

Who gets the ventilator? A multicentre survey of intensivists' opinions of triage during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.

Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Aug;66(7):859-868. doi: 10.1111/aas.14094. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14094
PMID:35678326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9348162/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a shortage of intensive care resources. Intensivists' opinion of triage and ventilator allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic is not well described.

METHODS

This was a survey concerning patient numbers, bed capacity, triage guidelines, and three virtual cases involving ventilator allocations. Physicians from 400 ICUs in a research network were invited to participate. Preferences were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Additionally, age, gender, work experience, geography, and religion were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 437 responders 31% were female. The mean age was 44.4 (SD 11.1) with a mean ICU experience of 13.7 (SD 10.5) years. Respondents were mostly European (88%). Sixty-six percent had triage guidelines available. Younger patients and caretakers of children were favoured for ventilator allocation although this was less clear if this involved withdrawal of the ventilator from another patient. Decisions did not differ with ICU experience, gender, religion, or guideline availability. Consultation of colleagues or an ethical committee decreased with age and male gender.

CONCLUSION

Intensivists appeared to prioritise younger patients for ventilator allocation. The tendency to consult colleagues about triage decreased with age and male gender. Many found such tasks to be not purely medical and that authorities should assume responsibility for triage during resource scarcity.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行导致重症监护资源短缺。重症监护医师在 COVID-19 大流行期间对分类和呼吸机分配的看法尚未得到充分描述。

方法

这是一项关于患者数量、床位容量、分类指南以及涉及呼吸机分配的三个虚拟病例的调查。邀请了来自研究网络中 400 个 ICU 的医生参与。使用五点李克特量表评估偏好。此外,还记录了年龄、性别、工作经验、地理位置和宗教信仰。

结果

在 437 名应答者中,31%为女性。平均年龄为 44.4(SD 11.1),平均 ICU 经验为 13.7(SD 10.5)年。受访者主要来自欧洲(88%)。66%有分类指南。年轻患者和儿童看护者更倾向于呼吸机分配,尽管如果这涉及从另一名患者撤下呼吸机,情况就不太清楚了。决策与 ICU 经验、性别、宗教或指南可用性无关。随着年龄的增长和男性性别,与同事协商或伦理委员会的咨询减少。

结论

重症监护医师似乎更倾向于为呼吸机分配年轻患者。随着年龄的增长和男性性别,咨询同事进行分类的倾向降低。许多人认为这些任务不仅仅是医学问题,当局应在资源匮乏时承担分类的责任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/96ec0999ffac/AAS-66-859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/2e58a313e7fd/AAS-66-859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/9437e41e411e/AAS-66-859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/b668bf127d44/AAS-66-859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/af04f81224ee/AAS-66-859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/96ec0999ffac/AAS-66-859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/2e58a313e7fd/AAS-66-859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/9437e41e411e/AAS-66-859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/b668bf127d44/AAS-66-859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/af04f81224ee/AAS-66-859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f2/9348162/96ec0999ffac/AAS-66-859-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Who gets the ventilator? A multicentre survey of intensivists' opinions of triage during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.谁能得到呼吸机?COVID-19 大流行第一波期间,重症监护医师对分诊的多中心调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Aug;66(7):859-868. doi: 10.1111/aas.14094. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
Which features of patients are morally relevant in ventilator triage? A survey of the UK public.在呼吸机调配中,哪些患者特征与道德有关?对英国公众的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 25;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00773-0.
3
Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators During a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions Among Japanese Health Care Workers and the General Public.大流行期间机械通气设备的分配:日本医护人员和公众对其认知的混合方法研究。
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2494-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Patient Admission and Mechanical Ventilator Allocation Decision-Making Processes by Frontline Medical Professionals in a Japanese ICU During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.COVID-19 大流行期间日本 ICU 一线医务人员的患者收治和机械通气分配决策过程:一项定性研究。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Dec;33(14):1291-1304. doi: 10.1177/10497323231201026. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
A catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping review.大流行期间支持重症监护床位和呼吸机治疗分配决策的危机和常规护理工具和变量目录:范围综述。
J Crit Care. 2021 Dec;66:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Would triage predictors perform better than first-come, first-served in pandemic ventilator allocation?在大流行期间呼吸机分配中,分诊预测指标是否比先来先服务表现得更好?
Chest. 2015 Jan;147(1):102-108. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0564.
7
Comparison of 2 Triage Scoring Guidelines for Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators.两种机械通气患者分诊评分指南的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029250. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29250.
8
Public Opinion on Priorities Toward Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配呼吸机的优先事项的意见:一项全国性调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;9:753048. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753048. eCollection 2021.
9
Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic.跨越欧盟边界治疗患者:新冠肺炎大流行背景下的国际调查。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):344-347. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001423.
10
Impact of staffing levels and resources of intensive care units on compliance to standard mechanical ventilator guidelines: A city-wide study in times of COVID-19 pandemic.重症监护病房人员配备水平和资源对符合标准机械通气指南的影响:COVID-19 大流行时期的全市范围研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Mar;28(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12768. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Professional vs Layperson Values and Preferences on Scarce Resource Allocation.医疗专业人员与非专业人员在稀缺资源分配上的价值观和偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1958.
2
Impact of Surge Strain and Pandemic Progression on Prognostication by an Established COVID-19-Specific Severity Score.激增应变和疫情进展对既定的新冠病毒特定严重程度评分预后预测的影响。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Dec 12;5(12):e1021. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001021. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Limiting life-sustaining treatment for very old ICU patients: cultural challenges and diverse practices.

本文引用的文献

1
Ventilator Allocation Protocols: Sophisticated Bioethics for an Unworkable Strategy.呼吸机分配方案:不切实际策略背后的复杂生命伦理学。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Sep;51(5):56-57. doi: 10.1002/hast.1289.
2
The impact of frailty on survival in elderly intensive care patients with COVID-19: the COVIP study.COVID-19 老年重症监护患者衰弱对生存的影响:COVIP 研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 19;25(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03551-3.
3
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.
限制老年重症监护病房患者的生命维持治疗:文化挑战与多样做法。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Oct 27;13(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01189-8.
4
Frailty prevalence in 42 European countries by age and gender: development of the SHARE Frailty Atlas for Europe.42 个欧洲国家按年龄和性别划分的虚弱症患病率:SHARE 欧洲虚弱症图谱的制定。
Geroscience. 2024 Apr;46(2):1807-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00975-3. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
5
The role of clinical phenotypes in decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for very old patients in the ICU.临床表型在重症监护病房老年患者维持生命治疗决策中的作用。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 May 10;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01136-7.
在新冠疫情期间优先分配“本就稀缺的”重症监护病房资源:呼吁南非成立地区分诊委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5.
4
COVID-19: a heavy toll on health-care workers.新冠疫情:给医护人员带来沉重代价。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Mar;9(3):226-228. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00068-0. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Age in the Time of COVID-19: An Ethical Analysis.新冠疫情时代的年龄:伦理分析
Aging Dis. 2021 Feb 1;12(1):7-13. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0929. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
Allocating scarce intensive care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical challenges to theoretical frameworks.在 COVID-19 大流行期间分配稀缺的重症监护资源:理论框架面临的实际挑战。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):430-434. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30580-4. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas.应将哪些因素纳入分诊?英国公众对大流行分诊困境的态度的在线调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e045593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045593.
8
Frailty Triage: Is Rationing Intensive Medical Treatment on the Grounds of Frailty Ethical?衰弱甄别:基于衰弱状况对强化医疗进行配给是否合乎伦理?
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Nov;21(11):48-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851809. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配的态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240651. eCollection 2020.
10
Recommendations on COVID-19 triage: international comparison and ethical analysis.关于 COVID-19 分诊的建议:国际比较与伦理分析。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):948-959. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12805. Epub 2020 Sep 25.