• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public Opinion on Priorities Toward Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配呼吸机的优先事项的意见:一项全国性调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;9:753048. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753048. eCollection 2021.
2
Priorities Towards Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Delphi Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间呼吸机公平分配的优先事项:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 24;8:769508. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.769508. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of 2 Triage Scoring Guidelines for Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators.两种机械通气患者分诊评分指南的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029250. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29250.
4
Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators During a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions Among Japanese Health Care Workers and the General Public.大流行期间机械通气设备的分配:日本医护人员和公众对其认知的混合方法研究。
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2494-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Public's Perspective.从公众角度出发对 COVID-19 大流行期间呼吸机的优先级设置。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):155-163. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1907474. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Public preferences for allocating absolute scarce critical healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.公众在 COVID-19 大流行期间对分配绝对稀缺的关键医疗保健资源的偏好。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 May 25;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2020-0494.
7
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配的态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240651. eCollection 2020.
8
Variation in COVID-19 Resource Allocation Protocols and Potential Implementation in the Chicago Metropolitan Area.《芝加哥都会区 COVID-19 资源分配协议的差异及其潜在实施》
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):266-275. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1983667. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
Which features of patients are morally relevant in ventilator triage? A survey of the UK public.在呼吸机调配中,哪些患者特征与道德有关?对英国公众的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 25;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00773-0.
10
Clinical and Ethical Considerations in Allocation of Ventilators in an Influenza Pandemic or Other Public Health Disaster: A Comparison of the 2007 and 2015 New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines.在流感大流行或其他公共卫生灾害中呼吸机分配的临床和伦理考虑:2007 年和 2015 年纽约州呼吸机分配指南比较。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Dec;14(6):e35-e44. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.232. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Promotion of Knowledge and Trust Surrounding Scarce Resource Allocation Policies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.促进稀缺资源分配政策相关知识和信任:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Oct 4;5(10):e243509. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3509.
2
What are the views of Quebec and Ontario citizens on the tiebreaker criteria for prioritizing access to adult critical care in the extreme context of a COVID-19 pandemic?在 COVID-19 大流行的极端情况下,魁北克省和安大略省公民对成人重症监护优先排序的决胜标准有何看法?
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01030-2.
3
Health Professional vs Layperson Values and Preferences on Scarce Resource Allocation.医疗专业人员与非专业人员在稀缺资源分配上的价值观和偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1958.
4
Exploring the clinical benefit of ventilation therapy across various patient groups with COVID-19 using real-world data.利用真实世界数据探索 COVID-19 不同患者群体中通气治疗的临床获益。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 3;13(1):10747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37912-5.
5
Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 triage protocols to access critical care: a scoping review.关于新冠疫情重症监护分诊方案中打破平局标准及潜在价值观的公众声音:一项范围综述
Discov Health Syst. 2023;2(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s44250-023-00027-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对稀缺医疗资源分配的社区偏好:文献综述。
Public Health. 2022 Aug;209:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Priorities Towards Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Delphi Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间呼吸机公平分配的优先事项:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 24;8:769508. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.769508. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A model of supply-chain decisions for resource sharing with an application to ventilator allocation to combat COVID-19.一种用于资源共享的供应链决策模型及其在抗击COVID-19的呼吸机分配中的应用。
Nav Res Logist. 2020 Aug;67(5):303-320. doi: 10.1002/nav.21905. Epub 2020 May 2.
2
COVID-19 in patients with diabetes: factors associated with worse outcomes.糖尿病患者的新型冠状病毒肺炎:与更差预后相关的因素
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Oct 28;20(2):1605-1614. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00910-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network under uncertainty: a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.不确定性下的可持续闭环供应链网络:对COVID-19大流行的应对措施
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep 14:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16077-6.
4
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Safety Practices About COVID-19 Among High School Students in Iran During the First Wave of the Pandemic.伊朗高中生在大流行第一波期间对 COVID-19 的认知、态度和安全实践。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;9:680514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680514. eCollection 2021.
5
Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to COVID-19 in Iran: Questionnaire Study.公众对伊朗 COVID-19 的知识、态度和实践:问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 23;7(2):e21415. doi: 10.2196/21415.
6
General Public Preferences for Allocating Scarce Medical Resources During COVID-19.公众在 COVID-19 期间对稀缺医疗资源分配的偏好。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;8:587423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587423. eCollection 2020.
7
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配的态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240651. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19: instruments for the allocation of mechanical ventilators-a narrative review.COVID-19:机械呼吸机分配工具——叙述性综述。
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 29;24(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03298-3.
9
Embedding the Problems Doesn't Make Them Go Away.掩盖问题并不会让它们消失。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):109-111. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1779864.
10
Adult ICU Triage During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Who Will Live and Who Will Die? Recommendations to Improve Survival.2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间的成人 ICU 分诊:谁将生存,谁将死亡?提高生存率的建议。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1196-1202. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004410.

公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配呼吸机的优先事项的意见:一项全国性调查。

Public Opinion on Priorities Toward Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;9:753048. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753048. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.753048
PMID:34970524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8712311/
Abstract

The rapidly growing imbalance between supply and demand for ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the principles for fair allocation of scarce resources. Failing to address public views and concerns on the subject could fuel distrust. The objective of this study was to determine the priorities of the Iranian public toward the fair allocation of ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic. This anonymous community-based national study was conducted from May 28 to Aug 20, 2020, in Iran. Data were collected via the Google Forms platform, using an online self-administrative questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed participants' assigned prioritization scores for ventilators based on medical and non-medical criteria. To quantify participants' responses on prioritizing ventilator allocation among sub-groups of patients with COVID-19 who need mechanical ventilation scores ranging from -2, very low priority, to +2, very high priority were assigned to each response. Responses of 2,043 participants, 1,189 women, and 1,012 men, were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 31.1 (9.5), being 32.1 (9.3) among women, and 29.9 (9.6) among men. Among all participants, 274 (13.4%) were healthcare workers. The median of assigned priority score was zero (equal) for gender, age 41-80, nationality, religion, socioeconomic, high-profile governmental position, high-profile occupation, being celebrities, employment status, smoking status, drug abuse, end-stage status, and obesity. The median assigned priority score was +2 (very high priority) for pregnancy, and having <2 years old children. The median assigned priority score was +1 (high priority) for physicians and nurses of patients with COVID-19, patients with nobel research position, those aged <40 years, those with underlying disease, immunocompromise status, and malignancy. Age>80 was the only factor participants assigned -1 (low priority) to. Participants stated that socioeconomic factors, except for age>80, should not be involved in prioritizing mechanical ventilators at the time of resources scarcity. Front-line physicians and nurses of COVID-19 patients, pregnant mothers, mothers who had children under 2 years old were given high priority.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,呼吸机的供需迅速失衡,这凸显了公平分配稀缺资源的原则。如果未能解决公众对此问题的看法和担忧,可能会加剧不信任。本研究旨在确定伊朗公众在 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配呼吸机的优先级。

这项匿名的基于社区的全国性研究于 2020 年 5 月 28 日至 8 月 20 日在伊朗进行。数据通过 Google Forms 平台收集,采用在线自我管理问卷。该问卷根据医疗和非医疗标准评估参与者对呼吸机分配的优先排序得分。为了量化参与者对需要机械通气的 COVID-19 患者亚组之间呼吸机分配优先级的反应,为每个反应分配了从-2(非常低优先级)到+2(非常高优先级)的分数。对 2043 名参与者(1189 名女性和 1012 名男性)的回复进行了分析。平均(SD)年龄为 31.1(9.5),女性为 32.1(9.3),男性为 29.9(9.6)。在所有参与者中,有 274 名(13.4%)是医疗保健工作者。性别、41-80 岁、国籍、宗教、社会经济地位、政府要员、知名职业、名人、就业状况、吸烟状况、药物滥用、终末期状态和肥胖等因素的分配优先级评分中位数均为零(相等)。怀孕和有 2 岁以下儿童的分配优先级评分中位数为+2(非常高优先级)。COVID-19 患者的医生和护士、有诺贝尔奖研究职位的患者、年龄<40 岁的患者、有基础疾病、免疫功能低下状态和恶性肿瘤的患者的分配优先级评分中位数为+1(高优先级)。只有年龄>80 岁是参与者分配-1(低优先级)的唯一因素。

参与者表示,在资源短缺时,除了年龄>80 岁以外,不应将社会经济因素纳入机械呼吸机的优先级排序。COVID-19 患者的一线医生和护士、孕妇、有 2 岁以下孩子的母亲被给予高优先级。