• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沟通如何“失败”或“扭转局面”:医疗差错的反事实叙述

How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.

作者信息

Street Richard L, Petrocelli John V, Amroze Azraa, Bergelt Corinna, Murphy Margaret, Wieting J Michael, Mazor Kathleen M

机构信息

Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520925270
PMID:33457572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786716/
Abstract

Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients' and family members' experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error ("close calls"). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients' and family members' past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers-information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient's or family member's concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient's or family member's proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often "saved the day." The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient's medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.

摘要

临床医生、患者和家庭成员之间的沟通障碍可能导致医疗差错,而有效的沟通或许可以预防此类错误。本调查研究了患者和家庭成员认为沟通失误导致医疗差错或有效沟通避免医疗差错(“险些发生的差错”)的经历。该研究对患者和家庭成员过去医疗差错或险些发生的差错经历的在线调查开放式回答进行了主题分析。在93名受访者中,56人(60%)讲述了医疗差错的故事,其余人描述了险些发生的差错。医疗差错故事中出现了两个主要主题,这些差错归因于医疗服务提供者——信息不足(如延迟、不准确)以及不听从或轻视患者或家庭成员的担忧。在险些发生的差错故事中,患者或家庭成员的积极沟通(如坚定自信、坚持不懈)最常“挽救局面”。研究结果凸显了鼓励患者/家属积极参与患者医疗护理以预防差错以及改进系统以便及时提供有意义信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.沟通如何“失败”或“扭转局面”:医疗差错的反事实叙述
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The impact that family members' health care experiences have on patients' trust in physicians.家庭成员的医疗保健经历对患者对医生的信任的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07172-y.
4
Patients' Experiences With Communication-and-Resolution Programs After Medical Injury.医疗损伤后患者对沟通与解决计划的体验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1595-1603. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4002.
5
Cancer survivors' experiences with breakdowns in patient-centered communication.癌症幸存者在以患者为中心的沟通中经历的崩溃。
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):423-429. doi: 10.1002/pon.4963. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Surgeon Communication and Family Understanding of Patient Prognosis in Critically Ill Surgical Patients: A Qualitative Investigation Informs Resident Training.外科医生与重症外科患者家属对患者预后的沟通:一项定性研究为住院医师培训提供信息。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e77-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Reducing medication errors and increasing patient safety: case studies in clinical pharmacology.减少用药错误并提高患者安全性:临床药理学案例研究
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):768-83.
8
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
9
A patient-initiated voluntary online survey of adverse medical events: the perspective of 696 injured patients and families.一项由患者发起的关于不良医疗事件的自愿在线调查:696名受伤患者及其家属的观点。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):620-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003980. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Communication breakdowns and diagnostic errors: a radiology perspective.沟通障碍与诊断错误:放射学视角
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Dec;1(4):253-261. doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0035. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
How to become partners. Ways to enhance the quality of patient and public involvement in healthcare research.如何成为合作伙伴。提高患者和公众参与医疗保健研究质量的方法。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;9(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Empathetic radiologic approaches in the era of AI: how can we improve the journey of patients with endometriosis?人工智能时代的共情放射学方法:我们如何改善子宫内膜异位症患者的就医体验?
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05052-1.
3
Exploring medical error taxonomies and human factors in simulation-based healthcare education.探索基于模拟的医疗保健教育中的医疗差错分类法和人为因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317128. eCollection 2025.
4
Using Patient Experience Surveys to Identify Potential Diagnostic Safety Breakdowns: A Mixed Methods Study.使用患者体验调查来识别潜在的诊断安全故障:一项混合方法研究。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Dec 1;20(8):556-563. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001283. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Just do it! Ten easy ways to enhance empathy in the consultation.那就行动起来!在诊疗过程中增强同理心的十种简单方法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Feb 29;74(740):124-125. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736593. Print 2024 Mar.
6
Beyond communication: an update on transforming healthcare teams.超越沟通:医疗团队转型的最新进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 21;11:1282173. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1282173. eCollection 2024.
7
Understanding the learning needs to enhance clinical competence of new professional nurses in public hospitals of South Africa: A qualitative study.了解南非公立医院新入职专业护士提升临床能力的学习需求:一项定性研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2022 Oct 21;8(5):414-421. doi: 10.33546/bnj.2180. eCollection 2022.
8
Shift handover quality in Saudi critical care units: determinants from nurses' perspectives.沙特重症监护病房的交接班质量:护士视角的决定因素
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 31;22(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01348-z.
9
Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.患者辅导:患者想要什么?在门诊候诊室进行的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer survivors' experiences with breakdowns in patient-centered communication.癌症幸存者在以患者为中心的沟通中经历的崩溃。
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):423-429. doi: 10.1002/pon.4963. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
2
We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience.我们想知道:患者在谈及护理失误和患者体验时的舒适度。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):190-197. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008159. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers.在 ICU 中表达对护理的关注:患者和家属的经历、态度和感知障碍。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):928-936. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007525. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Reducing Delay in Diagnosis: Multistage Recommendation Tracking.减少诊断延迟:多阶段推荐跟踪
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):970-975. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18332. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Speak Up! Addressing the Paradox Plaguing Patient-Centered Care.大声说出来!解决困扰以患者为中心的医疗护理的悖论。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):618-9. doi: 10.7326/M15-2416. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
6
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.来自患者护理的最密切观察者:对医院在线叙事评论的主题分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care.缺失的证据:对患者在医疗保健中不良事件经历的系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec;27(6):424-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv075. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Blame the Patient, Blame the Doctor or Blame the System? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies of Patient Safety in Primary Care.归咎于患者、归咎于医生还是归咎于制度?基层医疗中患者安全定性研究的元综合分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0128329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128329. eCollection 2015.
9
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.交接方案实施后医疗差错的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1803-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.
10
Current state of the art and science of patient-clinician communication in progressive disease: patients' need to know and need to feel known.进展性疾病中患者与临床医生沟通的当前技术和科学现状:患者了解的需求和被了解的需求。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3474-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0425. Epub 2014 Sep 29.