Suppr超能文献

沟通如何“失败”或“扭转局面”:医疗差错的反事实叙述

How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.

作者信息

Street Richard L, Petrocelli John V, Amroze Azraa, Bergelt Corinna, Murphy Margaret, Wieting J Michael, Mazor Kathleen M

机构信息

Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients' and family members' experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error ("close calls"). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients' and family members' past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers-information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient's or family member's concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient's or family member's proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often "saved the day." The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient's medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.

摘要

临床医生、患者和家庭成员之间的沟通障碍可能导致医疗差错,而有效的沟通或许可以预防此类错误。本调查研究了患者和家庭成员认为沟通失误导致医疗差错或有效沟通避免医疗差错(“险些发生的差错”)的经历。该研究对患者和家庭成员过去医疗差错或险些发生的差错经历的在线调查开放式回答进行了主题分析。在93名受访者中,56人(60%)讲述了医疗差错的故事,其余人描述了险些发生的差错。医疗差错故事中出现了两个主要主题,这些差错归因于医疗服务提供者——信息不足(如延迟、不准确)以及不听从或轻视患者或家庭成员的担忧。在险些发生的差错故事中,患者或家庭成员的积极沟通(如坚定自信、坚持不懈)最常“挽救局面”。研究结果凸显了鼓励患者/家属积极参与患者医疗护理以预防差错以及改进系统以便及时提供有意义信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The impact that family members' health care experiences have on patients' trust in physicians.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07172-y.
4
Patients' Experiences With Communication-and-Resolution Programs After Medical Injury.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1595-1603. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4002.
5
Cancer survivors' experiences with breakdowns in patient-centered communication.
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):423-429. doi: 10.1002/pon.4963. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
8
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
9
A patient-initiated voluntary online survey of adverse medical events: the perspective of 696 injured patients and families.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):620-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003980. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Communication breakdowns and diagnostic errors: a radiology perspective.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Dec;1(4):253-261. doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0035. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
How to become partners. Ways to enhance the quality of patient and public involvement in healthcare research.
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;9(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Exploring medical error taxonomies and human factors in simulation-based healthcare education.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317128. eCollection 2025.
4
Using Patient Experience Surveys to Identify Potential Diagnostic Safety Breakdowns: A Mixed Methods Study.
J Patient Saf. 2024 Dec 1;20(8):556-563. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001283. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Just do it! Ten easy ways to enhance empathy in the consultation.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Feb 29;74(740):124-125. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736593. Print 2024 Mar.
6
Beyond communication: an update on transforming healthcare teams.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 21;11:1282173. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1282173. eCollection 2024.
8
Shift handover quality in Saudi critical care units: determinants from nurses' perspectives.
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 31;22(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01348-z.
9
Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer survivors' experiences with breakdowns in patient-centered communication.
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):423-429. doi: 10.1002/pon.4963. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
2
We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):190-197. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008159. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):928-936. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007525. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Reducing Delay in Diagnosis: Multistage Recommendation Tracking.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):970-975. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18332. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Speak Up! Addressing the Paradox Plaguing Patient-Centered Care.
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):618-9. doi: 10.7326/M15-2416. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
6
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec;27(6):424-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv075. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Blame the Patient, Blame the Doctor or Blame the System? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies of Patient Safety in Primary Care.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0128329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128329. eCollection 2015.
9
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1803-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验