• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模外部验证机器学习算法以预测住院患者的肺栓塞。

Massive external validation of a machine learning algorithm to predict pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients.

机构信息

Dascena, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.

Dascena, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2022 Aug;216:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2022.05.016
PMID:35679633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition associated with ~10% of deaths of hospitalized patients. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs) which predict the onset of pulmonary embolism (PE) could enable earlier treatment and improve patient outcomes. However, the extent to which they generalize to broader patient populations impacts their clinical utility.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct the first large-scale external validation of a machine learning-based PE prediction model which uses EHR data from the first three hours of a patient's hospital stay to predict the occurrence of PE within the next 10 days of the inpatient stay.

METHODS

This retrospective study included approximately two million adult hospital admissions across 44 medical institutions in the US from 2011 to 2017. Demographics, vital signs, and lab tests from adult inpatients at 12 institutions (n = 331,268; 3.3% PE positive) were used for training an XGBoost model. External validation of the model was conducted on patient populations from each of 32 medical institutions (total n = 1,660,715; 3.7% PE positive) without retraining. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Backward elimination regression was used to identify correlations between characteristics of the external validation sets and AUROC.

RESULTS

The model performed well (AUROC = 0.87) on the 20% hold-out subset of the training set. Despite demographic differences between the 32 external validation populations (percent PE positive: min = 1.54%, max = 6.47%), without retraining, the model had excellent discrimination, with a mean AUROC of 0.88 (min = 0.79, max = 0.93). Fixing sensitivity at 0.80, the model had a mean specificity of 0.85 (min = 0.64, max = 0.93). Backward elimination regression identified a negative association (β = -0.015, p < 0.001) between the percentage of PE positive encounters and AUROC.

CONCLUSIONS

A PE prediction model performed remarkably well across 32 different external patient populations without retraining and despite significant differences in demographic characteristics, demonstrating its generalizability and potential as a clinical decision support tool to aid PE detection and improve patient outcomes in a clinical setting.

摘要

背景

肺栓塞(PE)是一种危及生命的疾病,约有 10%的住院患者死亡与之相关。预测肺栓塞(PE)发生的机器学习算法(MLAs)可以实现早期治疗并改善患者预后。然而,它们在多大程度上能够推广到更广泛的患者群体,会影响其临床实用性。

目的

对一个基于机器学习的 PE 预测模型进行首次大规模外部验证,该模型使用患者住院前 3 小时的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,预测住院后 10 天内发生 PE 的可能性。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2011 年至 2017 年期间美国 44 家医疗机构的约 200 万例成年住院患者。12 家医疗机构(n=331268;PE 阳性率为 3.3%)的成年住院患者的人口统计学、生命体征和实验室检查数据用于训练 XGBoost 模型。在不进行重新训练的情况下,对来自 32 家医疗机构(总 n=1660715;PE 阳性率为 3.7%)的患者人群进行模型外部验证。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型性能。采用向后逐步消除回归法确定外部验证集特征与 AUROC 之间的相关性。

结果

该模型在训练集的 20%留一验证子集上表现良好(AUROC=0.87)。尽管 32 个外部验证人群的人群特征存在差异(PE 阳性率:最小=1.54%,最大=6.47%),但无需重新训练,该模型的区分度仍极佳,平均 AUROC 为 0.88(最小=0.79,最大=0.93)。当固定敏感度为 0.80 时,该模型的平均特异性为 0.85(最小=0.64,最大=0.93)。向后逐步消除回归发现,PE 阳性病例百分比与 AUROC 呈负相关(β=-0.015,p<0.001)。

结论

无需重新训练,该 PE 预测模型在 32 个不同的外部患者人群中表现出色,尽管在人口统计学特征方面存在显著差异,但仍具有很好的泛化能力,有望成为一种临床决策支持工具,用于辅助 PE 检测并改善临床环境中的患者预后。

相似文献

1
Massive external validation of a machine learning algorithm to predict pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients.大规模外部验证机器学习算法以预测住院患者的肺栓塞。
Thromb Res. 2022 Aug;216:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Development and Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Result Forecast Model (PERFORM) for Computed Tomography Clinical Decision Support.用于计算机断层扫描临床决策支持的肺栓塞结果预测模型 (PERFORM) 的开发和性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198719. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8719.
3
Predicting pulmonary embolism among hospitalized patients with machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测住院患者的肺栓塞
Pulm Circ. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e12013. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12013. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Development of a machine learning model using electrocardiogram signals to improve acute pulmonary embolism screening.利用心电图信号开发机器学习模型以改善急性肺栓塞筛查
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Nov 25;3(1):56-66. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab101. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
6
Early Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in a General Patient Population Immediately Upon Hospital Admission Using Machine Learning to Identify New, Unidentified Risk Factors: Model Development Study.基于机器学习识别新的、未被识别的危险因素,在患者入院时即时对普通患者人群进行肺栓塞的早期检测:模型开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48595. doi: 10.2196/48595.
7
A comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to predict C. difficile infection in hospitalized patients.机器学习方法预测住院患者艰难梭菌感染的比较分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Mar;50(3):250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.012. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
8
Advancing prognostic precision in pulmonary embolism: A clinical and laboratory-based artificial intelligence approach for enhanced early mortality risk stratification.推进肺栓塞预后精准度:一种基于临床和实验室的人工智能方法,用于增强早期死亡风险分层。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Dec;167:107696. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107696. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
10
Machine learning with D-dimer in the risk stratification for pulmonary embolism: a derivation and internal validation study.基于 D-二聚体的机器学习在肺栓塞风险分层中的应用:一项推导和内部验证研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):13-19. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab089.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved pulmonary embolism detection in CT pulmonary angiogram scans with hybrid vision transformers and deep learning techniques.利用混合视觉变换器和深度学习技术提高CT肺血管造影扫描中肺栓塞的检测能力。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16238-4.
2
Research progress of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pulmonary embolism.人工智能与机器学习在肺栓塞中的研究进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 27;12:1577559. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577559. eCollection 2025.
3
A nomogram model to predict non-retrieval of short-term retrievable inferior vena cava filters.
一种预测短期可回收下腔静脉滤器无法取出的列线图模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 6;11:1393410. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1393410. eCollection 2024.
4
Early Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in a General Patient Population Immediately Upon Hospital Admission Using Machine Learning to Identify New, Unidentified Risk Factors: Model Development Study.基于机器学习识别新的、未被识别的危险因素,在患者入院时即时对普通患者人群进行肺栓塞的早期检测:模型开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48595. doi: 10.2196/48595.