Department of Biotechnology, M.S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology, MSR Nagar, MSRIT Post, Bangalore 560054, India; Visvesvaraya Technological University, Jnana Sangama, Belgaum 590018, India.
Department of Biotechnology, M.S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology, MSR Nagar, MSRIT Post, Bangalore 560054, India; Center for Bio and Energy Materials Innovation, M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka 560054, India.
Exp Mol Pathol. 2022 Aug;127:104803. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104803. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Although wound refers to simple cut in the skin, most wounds don't heal because of the various local and systemic factors that lead to its complexity and chronicity. Thus, prior understanding of the status of the wound is necessary and methods that can differentiate between the healing and non-healing wounds at a much earlier stage is crucial for a successful treatment.
The current study aims at differentiating Acute Wound Fibroblasts (AWFs) and Chronic Wound Fibroblasts (CWFs) based on differential expression of fibroblast specific markers such as Vimentin and Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) and compare its cell cycle and proliferation.
Immunostaining and western blotting analysis showed that, AWFs and CWFs differentially expressed vimentin and α-SMA, with AWFs and CWFs showing higher expression of vimentin and α-SMA respectively. AWFs showed higher distributions in G0/G1 (67.43% vs. 62.16%), S phase (22.61% vs. 8.51%) compared to CWFs. However, AWFs showed decreased distributions compared to CWFs in G2 + M phase (8.14% vs. 10.6%). Thus, it was observed that CWFs showed cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited DNA synthesis, which was further confirmed by reduced proliferation of CWFs. We suggest that, differential expression of the cell specific markers can be attributed to its pathophysiological status and chronicity of the wound and reduced proliferation rate of CWFs is due to lesser expression of vimentin, which is a key protein for in vitro cell proliferation.
Outcome of the study serve as an immunological tool to guide the chronicity of the wound, which helps to understand the wound towards design of personalized care. The findings also represent a promising opportunity to gain insight into how cell cycle arrest can impact on wound healing and clinical outcomes.
尽管伤口仅指皮肤的简单切口,但由于导致其复杂性和慢性化的各种局部和全身因素,大多数伤口无法愈合。因此,事先了解伤口的状况是必要的,并且能够在更早阶段区分愈合和未愈合伤口的方法对于成功治疗至关重要。
本研究旨在基于成纤维细胞特异性标志物(如波形蛋白和α平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA))的差异表达来区分急性伤口成纤维细胞(AWFs)和慢性伤口成纤维细胞(CWFs),并比较其细胞周期和增殖。
免疫染色和 Western blot 分析表明,AWFs 和 CWFs 差异表达波形蛋白和α-SMA,AWFs 和 CWFs 分别表现出更高的波形蛋白和α-SMA表达。与 CWFs 相比,AWFs 在 G0/G1 期(67.43%比 62.16%)和 S 期(22.61%比 8.51%)的分布更高。然而,与 CWFs 相比,AWFs 在 G2+M 期的分布减少(8.14%比 10.6%)。因此,观察到 CWFs 在 G1/G0 期出现细胞周期停滞并抑制 DNA 合成,这进一步通过 CWFs 的增殖减少得到证实。我们认为,细胞特异性标志物的差异表达可归因于伤口的病理生理状态和慢性,以及 CWFs 的增殖率降低是由于波形蛋白表达减少,波形蛋白是体外细胞增殖的关键蛋白。
研究结果可作为指导伤口慢性的免疫学工具,有助于了解伤口,从而设计个性化护理。这些发现还代表了一个有前途的机会,可以深入了解细胞周期停滞如何影响伤口愈合和临床结果。