• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院出院时药物沟通中的健康素养:挪威内科病房的一项定性研究。

Health literacy in medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Oslo Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e058473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058473.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058473
PMID:35680250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9185673/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

When discharged from hospital patients are often assumed to have sufficient health literacy (HL) to participate in their medical treatment and manage medical self-care after discharge. However, limited HL is a widespread concern and patient participation during discharge is lacking. In this study, we explore how HL influences medication communication during hospital discharge.

DESIGN

A qualitative case study, comprising unstructured observations of patient-healthcare personnel (HCP) encounters followed by semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis.

SETTING

An internal medicines ward at a university hospital in Norway.

PARTICIPANT

Fifteen patients aged 40-89 years were included close to the day of discharge.

RESULTS

The following themes describing dimensions of HL emerged: (1) access, (2) understand, (3) appraise and (4) apply. Most patients sought access to medication information from HCP, while some felt dependent on HCP to provide it. However, their abilities to understand, evaluate and make informed decisions were challenged, partly because HCPs' ability to adapt their communication to the patient's knowledgebase varied.

CONCLUSION

The results give a broader understanding of how HL influences medication communication during hospital discharge. To consider central dimensions of HL is important to achieve optimal medication communication, as the communication only can be exercised within the frames of the patient's HL. The findings in this study support that HL should be described as a shared responsibility between the patients and HCP. Attention should be focused to the HCP's responsibility to adapt the communication to the patient's knowledgebase.

摘要

目的

患者出院时,通常被认为具备足够的健康素养(HL)来参与他们的治疗,并在出院后管理医疗自我护理。然而,有限的 HL 是一个普遍存在的问题,患者在出院期间的参与度不足。在这项研究中,我们探讨了 HL 如何影响出院期间的药物沟通。

设计

定性案例研究,包括对患者-医疗保健人员(HCP)相遇的非结构化观察,随后进行半结构化访谈。使用内容分析对数据进行分析。

地点

挪威一所大学医院的内科病房。

参与者

15 名年龄在 40-89 岁的患者在接近出院日时被纳入研究。

结果

出现了描述 HL 维度的以下主题:(1)获取,(2)理解,(3)评估和(4)应用。大多数患者从 HCP 处寻求药物信息,但有些患者则依赖 HCP 提供信息。然而,他们理解、评估和做出明智决策的能力受到了挑战,部分原因是 HCP 适应患者知识基础的沟通能力存在差异。

结论

研究结果更全面地了解了 HL 如何影响出院期间的药物沟通。考虑 HL 的核心维度对于实现最佳药物沟通很重要,因为沟通只能在患者 HL 的范围内进行。本研究的结果支持 HL 应被视为患者和 HCP 之间的共同责任。应关注 HCP 适应患者知识基础的沟通责任。

相似文献

1
Health literacy in medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.医院出院时药物沟通中的健康素养:挪威内科病房的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e058473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058473.
2
Empowering the patient? Medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.赋予患者权力?医院出院时的药物沟通:挪威内科病房的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e044850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044850.
3
Considering health literacy in cardiovascular disease management: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.考虑到心血管疾病管理中的健康素养:一项关于医疗保健专业人员和患者观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08455-8.
4
Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.从患者角度看出院流程和药品沟通:挪威内科病房的一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):892-904. doi: 10.1111/hex.13232. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
'The way you talk, do I have a choice?' Patient narratives of medication decision-making during hospitalization.“你这样说,难道我还有别的选择吗?” 患者在住院期间对药物决策的叙述。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2250084. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2250084.
6
'You're Just Thinking About Going Home': Exploring Person-Centred Medication Communication With Older Patients at Hospital Discharge.'你只是想回家': 探讨医院出院时与老年患者的以人为主导的药物沟通。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70065. doi: 10.1111/hex.70065.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
Patient participation during discharge medication counselling: Observing real-life communication between healthcare professionals and patients.患者在出院药物咨询中的参与:观察医护人员与患者之间的真实沟通。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Aug;19(8):1228-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
10
Patients' perceptions of medicines information received at hospital discharge in Norway: a qualitative interview study.挪威:一项定性访谈研究,调查患者对出院时所获得的药品信息的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):144-153. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01122-0. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
'The way you talk, do I have a choice?' Patient narratives of medication decision-making during hospitalization.“你这样说,难道我还有别的选择吗?” 患者在住院期间对药物决策的叙述。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2250084. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2250084.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient activation in adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review.成人慢性病患者的患者激活:系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Jan;26(1):103-114. doi: 10.1177/1359105320947790. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
2
Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults.健康素养与社会经济地位、健康风险行为和健康状况的关联:丹麦成年人的一项大型全国性基于人群的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08498-8.
3
"Patient participation" and related concepts: A scoping review on their dimensional composition.“患者参与”及相关概念:对其维度构成的范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.患者参与急性住院内科病房的住院查房:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
5
Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence.患者赋权是否是促进依从性的关键?自我效能感、健康控制点与药物依从性之间关系的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186458. eCollection 2017.
6
Person Centered Care and Personalized Medicine: Irreconcilable Opposites or Potential Companions?以患者为中心的护理与个性化医疗:不可调和的对立面还是潜在的伙伴?
Health Care Anal. 2019 Mar;27(1):45-59. doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0347-5.
7
The Hawthorne effect in direct observation research with physicians and patients.医生与患者直接观察研究中的霍桑效应
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1322-1328. doi: 10.1111/jep.12781. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.《关于在<2030年可持续发展议程>中促进健康的上海宣言》
Health Promot Int. 2017 Feb 1;32(1):7-8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw103.
9
Effect of Health Literacy on Quality of Life amongst Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease in Australian General Practice.健康素养对澳大利亚全科医疗中缺血性心脏病患者生活质量的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0151079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151079. eCollection 2016.
10
Health literacy and adherence to medical treatment in chronic and acute illness: A meta-analysis.慢性和急性疾病中的健康素养与医疗依从性:一项荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1079-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 1.