Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovića 69, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.
High School of Culinary Arts and Tourism with Dormitory, Heroja Čajke 18, 36210 Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 28;19(11):6577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116577.
The aim of this study was to examine whether the capacity for mentalizing and resilience among healthcare workers (HCWs) explains the degree of burnout syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. The research was conducted on a sample of 406 healthcare workers (141 doctors and 265 nurses), aged 19 to 65 years (M = 40.11, SD = 9.41)—203 worked on the COVID-19 frontline, and 203 in regular clinical conditions. The Maslach Burnout Inventory was used to measure the burnout syndrome. Capacity for mentalizing was examined using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. The Brief Resilience Scale was used to measure resilience. The results indicated that there were negative correlations between resilience and the dimensions of burnout—emotional exhaustion (r = −0.38; p < 0.01) and depersonalization (r = −0.11; p < 0.05), and a positive correlation between resilience and personal accomplishment (r = 0.27; p < 0.01), as was expected. The analyses of hierarchical linear regression showed that hypomentalizing was a significant positive predictor of emotional exhaustion (ß = 0.12; p < 005) and depersonalization (ß = 0.15; p < 0.05), resilience was a significant negative predictor of emotional exhaustion (ß = −0.28, p < 0.01) and positive predictor of personal accomplishment (ß = 0.20; p < 0.01), and that the degree of explained variance of burnout dimensions was higher when resilience and hypomentalizing were included in regression models, in addition to sociodemographic variables. The findings suggest that being a woman and working on the COVID-19 frontline implies a higher burnout, while the level of burnout decreases with better socioeconomic status and more children. Resilience, capacity for mentalizing, and burnout syndrome among HCWs are interrelated phenomena, which have important professional implications.
这项研究的目的是检验在塞尔维亚,医护人员(HCWs)的心理理论能力和适应力是否能解释他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间出现的倦怠综合征程度。研究对象为来自塞尔维亚的 406 名医护人员(141 名医生和 265 名护士),年龄在 19 岁至 65 岁之间(M = 40.11,SD = 9.41)——其中 203 人在 COVID-19 一线工作,203 人在常规临床条件下工作。使用马斯拉赫倦怠量表来衡量倦怠综合征。使用反思功能问卷来衡量心理理论能力。使用简要韧性量表来衡量适应力。研究结果表明,适应力与倦怠的各个维度呈负相关——情绪耗竭(r = -0.38;p < 0.01)和去人格化(r = -0.11;p < 0.05),而与个人成就感呈正相关(r = 0.27;p < 0.01),这与预期相符。分层线性回归分析表明,低心理理论能力是情绪耗竭(ß = 0.12;p < 0.05)和去人格化(ß = 0.15;p < 0.05)的显著正预测因素,而适应力是情绪耗竭的显著负预测因素(ß = -0.28,p < 0.01)和个人成就感的正预测因素(ß = 0.20;p < 0.01),此外,将社会人口统计学变量纳入回归模型后,倦怠维度的解释方差程度更高。研究结果表明,女性和在 COVID-19 一线工作意味着更高的倦怠水平,而随着社会经济地位的提高和孩子的增加,倦怠水平会降低。医护人员的适应力、心理理论能力和倦怠综合征是相互关联的现象,具有重要的专业意义。