Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nutrition and Health Unit, Costa Rican Institute for Research and Education on Nutrition and Health (INCIENSA), Ministry of Health, Tres Rios 4-2250, Costa Rica.
Nutrients. 2022 May 31;14(11):2314. doi: 10.3390/nu14112314.
Whereas parental feeding styles (PFS) influence children's diet, less is known about this relationship in adolescents.
A cross-sectional study in 686 Costa Rican adolescents (13-18 years) evaluated 4 validated PFS scores: healthy eating verbal encouragement; scolding; directly controlling diet; instrumental/emotional. Diet was evaluated through 3-day food records, deriving a Traditional Costa Rica Adolescents Diet Score (TCRAD). Excess weight (EW) measured by BMI was dichotomized following standards. Regression-based mediation analysis estimated the overall and sex-stratified odds ratios of EW for natural direct (NDE), natural indirect (NIE), and total effects (TE) of the pathway PFS→TCRAD→EW.
A one-unit increase in the direct control PFS score was associated with higher EW odds overall [(TE: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.04-2.31; = 0.033), (NDE: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.02-2.27; = 0.039)], and in boys [(TE: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.04-4.38; = 0.039), (NDE: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.03-4.31; = 0.042)]. Non-significant mediation by TCRAD was observed for the healthy eating verbal encouragement PFS overall ( = 0.06). Associations for the instrumental/emotional and scolding PFS were not significant.
Direct diet control from parents may contribute to adolescents' excess weight, particularly among boys. Parents encouraging healthy eating might support adolescents' healthy weight through a healthy diet. Longitudinal research should clarify the association between PFS and diet-related outcomes among diverse adolescents.
父母的喂养方式(PFS)会影响孩子的饮食,而青少年中这种关系的了解较少。
对 686 名哥斯达黎加青少年(13-18 岁)进行了一项横断面研究,评估了 4 种经过验证的 PFS 评分:健康饮食口头鼓励;责骂;直接控制饮食;工具/情感。通过 3 天的食物记录评估饮食,得出传统哥斯达黎加青少年饮食评分(TCRAD)。根据标准将 BMI 测量的超重(EW)分为两部分。基于回归的中介分析估计了 PFS→TCRAD→EW 路径的整体和性别分层 EW 的自然直接(NDE)、自然间接(NIE)和总效应(TE)的比值比。
直接控制 PFS 评分增加一个单位与整体 EW 几率增加相关[总效应(TE):1.55;95%CI:1.04-2.31;P=0.033],男孩中也有类似的结果[总效应(TE):2.13;95%CI:1.04-4.38;P=0.039]。整体上,健康饮食口头鼓励 PFS 对 TCRAD 具有非显著的中介作用(P=0.06)。工具/情感和责骂 PFS 的相关性不显著。
父母直接控制饮食可能会导致青少年超重,尤其是男孩。父母鼓励健康饮食可能会通过健康饮食来支持青少年的健康体重。纵向研究应该阐明 PFS 与不同青少年饮食相关结果之间的关系。