• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于混合深度学习方法的汽车软件系统硬件在环测试智能故障检测与分类

Intelligent Fault Detection and Classification Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Methods for Hardware-in-the-Loop Test of Automotive Software Systems.

作者信息

Abboush Mohammad, Bamal Daniel, Knieke Christoph, Rausch Andreas

机构信息

Institute for Software and Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Clausthal, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 27;22(11):4066. doi: 10.3390/s22114066.

DOI:10.3390/s22114066
PMID:35684686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9185421/
Abstract

Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) has been recommended by ISO 26262 as an essential test bench for determining the safety and reliability characteristics of automotive software systems (ASSs). However, due to the complexity and the huge amount of data recorded by the HIL platform during the testing process, the conventional data analysis methods used for detecting and classifying faults based on the human expert are not realizable. Therefore, the development of effective means based on the historical data set is required to analyze the records of the testing process in an efficient manner. Even though data-driven fault diagnosis is superior to other approaches, selecting the appropriate technique from the wide range of Deep Learning (DL) techniques is challenging. Moreover, the training data containing the automotive faults are rare and considered highly confidential by the automotive industry. Using hybrid DL techniques, this study proposes a novel intelligent fault detection and classification (FDC) model to be utilized during the V-cycle development process, i.e., the system integration testing phase. To this end, an HIL-based real-time fault injection framework is used to generate faulty data without altering the original system model. In addition, a combination of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is employed to build the model structure. In this study, eight types of sensor faults are considered to cover the most common potential faults in the signals of ASSs. As a case study, a gasoline engine system model is used to demonstrate the capabilities and advantages of the proposed method and to verify the performance of the model. The results prove that the proposed method shows better detection and classification performance compared to other standalone DL methods. Specifically, the overall detection accuracies of the proposed structure in terms of precision, recall and F1-score are 98.86%, 98.90% and 98.88%, respectively. For classification, the experimental results also demonstrate the superiority under unseen test data with an average accuracy of 98.8%.

摘要

硬件在环(HIL)已被ISO 26262推荐为确定汽车软件系统(ASS)安全和可靠性特征的重要测试平台。然而,由于HIL平台在测试过程中记录的数据复杂且数量庞大,基于人类专家进行故障检测和分类的传统数据分析方法无法实现。因此,需要开发基于历史数据集的有效方法,以便高效地分析测试过程的记录。尽管数据驱动的故障诊断优于其他方法,但从众多深度学习(DL)技术中选择合适的技术具有挑战性。此外,包含汽车故障的训练数据很少,且被汽车行业视为高度机密。本研究使用混合DL技术,提出了一种新颖的智能故障检测与分类(FDC)模型,用于V循环开发过程,即系统集成测试阶段。为此,使用基于HIL的实时故障注入框架来生成故障数据,而不改变原始系统模型。此外,采用卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)的组合来构建模型结构。在本研究中,考虑了八种类型的传感器故障,以涵盖ASS信号中最常见的潜在故障。作为案例研究,使用汽油发动机系统模型来证明所提方法的能力和优势,并验证模型的性能。结果证明,与其他独立的DL方法相比,所提方法具有更好的检测和分类性能。具体而言,所提结构在精度、召回率和F1分数方面的总体检测准确率分别为98.86%、98.90%和98.88%。对于分类,实验结果还证明了在未见测试数据下的优越性,平均准确率为98.8%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/4be9180286d4/sensors-22-04066-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/63fa33c665f6/sensors-22-04066-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/18e6467f3bab/sensors-22-04066-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/0899dcaa917f/sensors-22-04066-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/12adf371137e/sensors-22-04066-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/095c60c25db3/sensors-22-04066-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/5fb9a347a855/sensors-22-04066-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/1b3f49279d92/sensors-22-04066-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/db2de91c35b4/sensors-22-04066-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/eec34276f18e/sensors-22-04066-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/d6bb8859c027/sensors-22-04066-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/0745885bd3ae/sensors-22-04066-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/4a423ec92a19/sensors-22-04066-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/bd327cd9caad/sensors-22-04066-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/8d6c3a5a0f45/sensors-22-04066-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/4be9180286d4/sensors-22-04066-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/63fa33c665f6/sensors-22-04066-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/18e6467f3bab/sensors-22-04066-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/0899dcaa917f/sensors-22-04066-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/12adf371137e/sensors-22-04066-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/095c60c25db3/sensors-22-04066-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/5fb9a347a855/sensors-22-04066-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/1b3f49279d92/sensors-22-04066-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/db2de91c35b4/sensors-22-04066-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/eec34276f18e/sensors-22-04066-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/d6bb8859c027/sensors-22-04066-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/0745885bd3ae/sensors-22-04066-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/4a423ec92a19/sensors-22-04066-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/bd327cd9caad/sensors-22-04066-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/8d6c3a5a0f45/sensors-22-04066-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2e/9185421/4be9180286d4/sensors-22-04066-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Intelligent Fault Detection and Classification Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Methods for Hardware-in-the-Loop Test of Automotive Software Systems.基于混合深度学习方法的汽车软件系统硬件在环测试智能故障检测与分类
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 27;22(11):4066. doi: 10.3390/s22114066.
2
GRU-Based Denoising Autoencoder for Detection and Clustering of Unknown Single and Concurrent Faults during System Integration Testing of Automotive Software Systems.基于门控循环单元(GRU)的去噪自编码器在汽车软件系统集成测试中未知单故障和并发故障检测与聚类中的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;23(14):6606. doi: 10.3390/s23146606.
3
Hardware-in-the-Loop-Based Real-Time Fault Injection Framework for Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Automotive Software Systems.基于硬件在环的汽车软件系统动态行为分析实时故障注入框架
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 10;22(4):1360. doi: 10.3390/s22041360.
4
A Virtual Testing Framework for Real-Time Validation of Automotive Software Systems Based on Hardware in the Loop and Fault Injection.一种基于硬件在环和故障注入的汽车软件系统实时验证虚拟测试框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 8;24(12):3733. doi: 10.3390/s24123733.
5
Automating Fault Test Cases Generation and Execution for Automotive Safety Validation via NLP and HIL Simulation.通过自然语言处理和硬件在环仿真实现汽车安全验证故障测试用例生成与执行的自动化
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 15;24(10):3145. doi: 10.3390/s24103145.
6
Fault-Diagnosis and Fault-Recovery System of Hall Sensors in Brushless DC Motor Based on Neural Networks.基于神经网络的无刷直流电机霍尔传感器故障诊断与容错系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;23(9):4330. doi: 10.3390/s23094330.
7
Open-Circuit Fault Detection and Classification of Modular Multilevel Converters in High Voltage Direct Current Systems (MMC-HVDC) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Method.基于长短期记忆(LSTM)方法的高压直流系统(MMC-HVDC)模块化多电平换流器开路故障检测与分类
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;21(12):4159. doi: 10.3390/s21124159.
8
Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Liquid Rocket Engine via Interpretable LSTM with Multisensory Data.基于多源数据的可解释 LSTM 对液体火箭发动机的智能故障诊断
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;23(12):5636. doi: 10.3390/s23125636.
9
Deep Learning-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method for Embedded Systems.基于深度学习的嵌入式系统轴承故障诊断方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 2;20(23):6886. doi: 10.3390/s20236886.
10
A Bearing Fault Classification Framework Based on Image Encoding Techniques and a Convolutional Neural Network under Different Operating Conditions.基于图像编码技术和卷积神经网络的不同工况下的轴承故障分类框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;22(13):4881. doi: 10.3390/s22134881.

引用本文的文献

1
Automating Fault Test Cases Generation and Execution for Automotive Safety Validation via NLP and HIL Simulation.通过自然语言处理和硬件在环仿真实现汽车安全验证故障测试用例生成与执行的自动化
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 15;24(10):3145. doi: 10.3390/s24103145.
2
Gas Sensor Array Fault Diagnosis Based on Multi-Dimensional Fusion, an Attention Mechanism, and Multi-Task Learning.基于多维融合、注意力机制和多任务学习的气体传感器阵列故障诊断
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;23(18):7836. doi: 10.3390/s23187836.
3
GRU-Based Denoising Autoencoder for Detection and Clustering of Unknown Single and Concurrent Faults during System Integration Testing of Automotive Software Systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Hardware-in-the-Loop-Based Real-Time Fault Injection Framework for Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Automotive Software Systems.基于硬件在环的汽车软件系统动态行为分析实时故障注入框架
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 10;22(4):1360. doi: 10.3390/s22041360.
2
Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis for Electric Drives: A Review.数据驱动的电机驱动故障诊断:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;21(12):4024. doi: 10.3390/s21124024.
3
Multi-Sensor Fault Detection, Identification, Isolation and Health Forecasting for Autonomous Vehicles.多传感器故障检测、识别、隔离与自主车辆健康预测
基于门控循环单元(GRU)的去噪自编码器在汽车软件系统集成测试中未知单故障和并发故障检测与聚类中的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;23(14):6606. doi: 10.3390/s23146606.
4
Single-Wire Control and Fault Detection for Automotive Exterior Lighting Systems.汽车外部照明系统的单线控制与故障检测
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;23(14):6521. doi: 10.3390/s23146521.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 5;21(7):2547. doi: 10.3390/s21072547.
4
Intelligent fault diagnosis of machines with small & imbalanced data: A state-of-the-art review and possible extensions.小数据与不平衡数据情况下机器的智能故障诊断:最新综述与可能的拓展
ISA Trans. 2022 Jan;119:152-171. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.02.042. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
A Novel Deep Learning Model for the Detection and Identification of Rolling Element-Bearing Faults.一种用于滚动轴承故障检测与识别的新型深度学习模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 8;20(18):5112. doi: 10.3390/s20185112.
6
Fault Diagnosis of Rotary Machines Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Wide Three Axis Vibration Signal Input.基于宽三轴向振动信号输入的深度卷积神经网络的旋转机械故障诊断。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 19;20(14):4017. doi: 10.3390/s20144017.
7
Hybrid multi-mode machine learning-based fault diagnosis strategies with application to aircraft gas turbine engines.基于混合多模式机器学习的故障诊断策略及其在飞机燃气涡轮发动机中的应用。
Neural Netw. 2020 Oct;130:126-142. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Combined Autoencoder and Long Short-Term Memory Network.基于联合自动编码器和长短期记忆网络的故障检测与诊断。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 23;19(21):4612. doi: 10.3390/s19214612.
9
Hybrid Data Fusion DBN for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Vehicle Reducers.用于车辆减速器智能故障诊断的混合数据融合深度信念网络
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 31;19(11):2504. doi: 10.3390/s19112504.
10
Integral Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation for Railway Traction Drive.轨道交通牵引传动系统的积分传感器故障检测与隔离
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 13;18(5):1543. doi: 10.3390/s18051543.