Andrade A C M, Borges A B, Kukulka E C, Moecke S E, Scotti N, Comba A, Pucci C R, Torres C R G
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Dental School, Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, Turin, Italy.
Int J Dent. 2022 May 31;2022:2011864. doi: 10.1155/2022/2011864. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the optical property changes after staining of precured (PC) and light-cured (LC) composites.
Specimens were prepared using different LC composites (GrandioSO-Voco, Filtek Z350-3M/ESPE, Opallis-FGM, and Kalore-GC) and four PC blocks (Grandio Blocs-Voco, Lava Ultimate-3M ESPE, Brava Block-FGM, and Cerasmart-GC) from the same manufacturers ( = 20). Baseline color, gloss, translucency, and fluorescence were evaluated. The staining protocol was performed for 15 days, and the final optical properties were reevaluated.
The changes in each property were calculated (ΔGloss, ΔTranslucency, ΔFluorescency, Δ 00). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test ( = 5%). Changes in all properties were observed after staining for all materials, with darkening and reduction of gloss, fluorescence, and translucency. Nonsignificant differences were observed between the light-cured and precured materials of the same manufacturer for Δ and Δ, but significant differences existed for Δ and Δ 00. For Δ, the only significant differences were observed between Brava Block and Opallis (smaller). For Δ , only the light-cured composites GrandioSO and Z350 showed significantly less change than the corresponding blocks. Precured composites were affected the same way as light-cured ones by the staining in relation to the reduction of gloss and translucency.
A higher reduction in fluorescence was observed for only one brand of block and was similar for the others. The two brands of light-cured materials showed less staining, while for the others, the staining was similar. The effects of staining vary according to the composite formulation.
本研究旨在评估预固化(PC)和光固化(LC)复合材料染色后的光学性能变化。
使用不同的光固化复合材料(GrandioSO - Voco、Filtek Z350 - 3M/ESPE、Opallis - FGM和Kalore - GC)以及来自相同制造商的四种预固化块材(Grandio Blocs - Voco、Lava Ultimate - 3M ESPE、Brava Block - FGM和Cerasmart - GC)制备样本(n = 20)。评估基线颜色、光泽度、透明度和荧光。进行15天的染色方案,并重新评估最终光学性能。
计算每种性能的变化(Δ光泽度、Δ透明度、Δ荧光、ΔΔ00)。数据通过方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(α = 5%)。所有材料染色后均观察到所有性能的变化,包括颜色变深以及光泽度、荧光和透明度降低。同一制造商的光固化和预固化材料在Δ和Δ方面无显著差异,但在Δ和Δ00方面存在显著差异。对于Δ,仅在Brava Block和Opallis之间观察到显著差异(较小)。对于Δ,只有光固化复合材料GrandioSO和Z350的变化明显小于相应的块材。预固化复合材料在光泽度和透明度降低方面与光固化复合材料受染色的影响方式相同。
仅一个品牌的块材观察到荧光有更高程度的降低,其他品牌相似。两个品牌的光固化材料染色较少,而其他品牌的染色情况相似。染色效果因复合材料配方而异。