Zimová Soňa, Dobor Laura, Hlásny Tomáš, Rammer Werner, Seidl Rupert
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Group, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
For Ecol Manage. 2020 Nov;475:118408. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118408.
Forest disturbance regimes are intensifying in many parts of the globe. In order to mitigate disturbance impacts a number of management responses have been proposed, yet their effectiveness in addressing changing disturbance regimes remains largely unknown. The strong positive relationship between forest age and the vulnerability to disturbances such as windthrows and bark beetle infestations suggests that a reduced rotation length can be a potent means for mitigating the impacts of natural disturbances. However, disturbance mitigation measures such as shortened rotation lengths (SRL) can also have undesired consequences on ecosystem services and biodiversity, which need to be considered in their application. Here, we used the process-based landscape and disturbance model iLand to investigate the effects of SRL on the vulnerability of a 16,000 ha forest landscape in Central Europe to wind and bark beetle disturbances. We experimentally reduced the current rotation length (between 100 and 115 years) by up to -40% in 10% increments, and studied effects on disturbance dynamics under current and future climate conditions over a 200-year simulation period. Simultaneously, we quantified the collateral effects of SRL on forest carbon stocks and indicators of biodiversity. Shortening the rotation length by 40% decreased disturbances by 14%. This effect was strongly diminished under future climate change, reducing the mitigating effect of shortened rotation to < 6%. Collateral effects were severe in the initial decades after implementation: Reducing the rotation length by 40% caused a spike in harvested timber volume (+ 92%), decreased total forest carbon storage by 6% and reduced the number of large trees on the landscape by 20%. The long-term effects of SRL were less pronounced. At the same time, SRL caused an increase in tree species diversity. Shortening rotation length can reduce the impact of wind and bark beetle disturbances, but the overall efficiency of the measure is limited and decreases under climate change. Given the potential for undesired collateral effects we conclude that a reduction of the rotation length is no panacea for managing increasing disturbances, and should be applied in combination with other management measures reducing risks and fostering resilience.
全球许多地区的森林干扰状况正在加剧。为了减轻干扰影响,人们提出了一些管理应对措施,但其在应对不断变化的干扰状况方面的有效性仍 largely 未知。森林年龄与诸如风倒和树皮甲虫侵害等干扰的脆弱性之间存在很强的正相关关系,这表明缩短轮伐期可能是减轻自然干扰影响的有效手段。然而,诸如缩短轮伐期(SRL)等干扰缓解措施也可能对生态系统服务和生物多样性产生不良后果,在应用时需要加以考虑。在此,我们使用基于过程的景观和干扰模型 iLand 来研究 SRL 对中欧一个 16000 公顷森林景观遭受风和树皮甲虫干扰的脆弱性的影响。我们通过以 10%的增量将当前轮伐期(100 至 115 年)最多减少 -40%进行实验,并研究了在 200 年的模拟期内当前和未来气候条件下对干扰动态的影响。同时,我们量化了 SRL 对森林碳储量和生物多样性指标的附带影响。将轮伐期缩短 40%可使干扰减少 14%。在未来气候变化下,这种效果大幅减弱,将缩短轮伐期的缓解效果降低至 <6%。实施后的最初几十年附带影响严重:将轮伐期缩短 40%导致采伐木材量激增(+92%),森林总碳储量减少 6%,景观上大树数量减少 20%。SRL 的长期影响不太明显。与此同时,SRL 导致树种多样性增加。缩短轮伐期可以减少风和树皮甲虫干扰的影响,但该措施的整体效率有限,并且在气候变化下会降低。鉴于存在不良附带影响的可能性,我们得出结论,缩短轮伐期并非应对日益增加的干扰的万灵药,应与其他降低风险和增强恢复力的管理措施结合使用。